识别高血压诊断和治疗的研究差距:来自指南更新的证据。

IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING
Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research Pub Date : 2025-09-11 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_274_24
Nizal Sarrafzadegan, Shahla Shahidi, Fahimeh B Kholenjani
{"title":"识别高血压诊断和治疗的研究差距:来自指南更新的证据。","authors":"Nizal Sarrafzadegan, Shahla Shahidi, Fahimeh B Kholenjani","doi":"10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_274_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development of clinical practice guidelines presents a unique opportunity to identify research gaps systematically. This study aimed to uncover such gaps in the hypertension field while updating the Iranian hypertension guideline.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was conducted as part of the systematic review component of the 2021 Iranian hypertension guideline update. An extensive search of electronic databases was performed to identify evidence relevant to PICO (Population, Interventions, Comparisons, Outcomes) questions. Any topic without evidence with high certainty of effect was considered a knowledge gap.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 227 studies were reviewed and appraised. Nine topics, such as non-pharmacological treatment, treatment thresholds, visit and follow-up intervals, laboratory tests, drug immunotherapy, adherence to treatment, complementary medicine, telehealth, COVID-19 were identified as research gaps.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The identified research gaps can be examined and prioritized by policymakers in the research field, and actions can be taken to plan for addressing them.</p>","PeriodicalId":44816,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","volume":"30 5","pages":"771-774"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Research Gaps in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertension: Evidence from a Guideline Update.\",\"authors\":\"Nizal Sarrafzadegan, Shahla Shahidi, Fahimeh B Kholenjani\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_274_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development of clinical practice guidelines presents a unique opportunity to identify research gaps systematically. This study aimed to uncover such gaps in the hypertension field while updating the Iranian hypertension guideline.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was conducted as part of the systematic review component of the 2021 Iranian hypertension guideline update. An extensive search of electronic databases was performed to identify evidence relevant to PICO (Population, Interventions, Comparisons, Outcomes) questions. Any topic without evidence with high certainty of effect was considered a knowledge gap.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 227 studies were reviewed and appraised. Nine topics, such as non-pharmacological treatment, treatment thresholds, visit and follow-up intervals, laboratory tests, drug immunotherapy, adherence to treatment, complementary medicine, telehealth, COVID-19 were identified as research gaps.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The identified research gaps can be examined and prioritized by policymakers in the research field, and actions can be taken to plan for addressing them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"771-774\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445896/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_274_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_274_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床实践指南的发展为系统地识别研究差距提供了独特的机会。本研究旨在揭示高血压领域的这些差距,同时更新伊朗高血压指南。材料和方法:本研究是作为2021年伊朗高血压指南更新的系统评价部分进行的。对电子数据库进行了广泛的搜索,以确定与PICO(人口、干预、比较、结果)问题相关的证据。任何没有高确定性证据的主题都被认为是知识缺口。结果:共对227项研究进行了回顾和评价。非药物治疗、治疗阈值、就诊和随访间隔、实验室检查、药物免疫治疗、坚持治疗、补充医学、远程医疗、COVID-19等9个主题被确定为研究空白。结论:研究领域的决策者可以对已确定的研究差距进行审查和优先排序,并采取行动制定解决这些差距的计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying Research Gaps in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertension: Evidence from a Guideline Update.

Background: The development of clinical practice guidelines presents a unique opportunity to identify research gaps systematically. This study aimed to uncover such gaps in the hypertension field while updating the Iranian hypertension guideline.

Materials and methods: This study was conducted as part of the systematic review component of the 2021 Iranian hypertension guideline update. An extensive search of electronic databases was performed to identify evidence relevant to PICO (Population, Interventions, Comparisons, Outcomes) questions. Any topic without evidence with high certainty of effect was considered a knowledge gap.

Results: A total of 227 studies were reviewed and appraised. Nine topics, such as non-pharmacological treatment, treatment thresholds, visit and follow-up intervals, laboratory tests, drug immunotherapy, adherence to treatment, complementary medicine, telehealth, COVID-19 were identified as research gaps.

Conclusions: The identified research gaps can be examined and prioritized by policymakers in the research field, and actions can be taken to plan for addressing them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
46 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信