{"title":"确定海洋环境中新出现的关注污染物(CECs)的多采样策略。","authors":"Enrique J Díaz-Montaña, Sofía Domínguez-Gil","doi":"10.3390/jox15050149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The determination of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in the marine environment is performed through many different sampling approaches. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to compare different existing sampling strategies: biofilm mesocosms, considering micro- and macrofouling; passive sampling; and grab marine water. The sampling of grab water was performed considering spatial and time-line variations. The spatial analysis of CECs showed that three sun agents and caffeine represent the biggest proportion of CECs in the Malaga Mediterranean coastal area, ranging from 0.391 to 0.495 ng/L. The time-line analysis did not show any upward or downward trend in CEC concentration. The mesocosm study comprised a separate evaluation of micro- and macrofouling that showed similar profiles, in which the sun agents presented the highest concentrations. While certain compounds were detected at comparable levels in both fouling types, such as clotrimazole around 0.001 ng/L, others exhibited significant differences in concentration, like caffeine. The passive sampling was also performed, obtaining similar results to those observed in the biofilm mesocosm macrofouling. Finally, all the obtained results from the different samplings were statistically compared, showing that passive sampling presented greater similarities with macrofouling and that there are significant differences between the sampling approach employed.</p>","PeriodicalId":42356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Xenobiotics","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452650/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multisampling Strategies for Determining Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs) in the Marine Environment.\",\"authors\":\"Enrique J Díaz-Montaña, Sofía Domínguez-Gil\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jox15050149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The determination of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in the marine environment is performed through many different sampling approaches. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to compare different existing sampling strategies: biofilm mesocosms, considering micro- and macrofouling; passive sampling; and grab marine water. The sampling of grab water was performed considering spatial and time-line variations. The spatial analysis of CECs showed that three sun agents and caffeine represent the biggest proportion of CECs in the Malaga Mediterranean coastal area, ranging from 0.391 to 0.495 ng/L. The time-line analysis did not show any upward or downward trend in CEC concentration. The mesocosm study comprised a separate evaluation of micro- and macrofouling that showed similar profiles, in which the sun agents presented the highest concentrations. While certain compounds were detected at comparable levels in both fouling types, such as clotrimazole around 0.001 ng/L, others exhibited significant differences in concentration, like caffeine. The passive sampling was also performed, obtaining similar results to those observed in the biofilm mesocosm macrofouling. Finally, all the obtained results from the different samplings were statistically compared, showing that passive sampling presented greater similarities with macrofouling and that there are significant differences between the sampling approach employed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Xenobiotics\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452650/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Xenobiotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jox15050149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Xenobiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jox15050149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multisampling Strategies for Determining Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs) in the Marine Environment.
The determination of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in the marine environment is performed through many different sampling approaches. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to compare different existing sampling strategies: biofilm mesocosms, considering micro- and macrofouling; passive sampling; and grab marine water. The sampling of grab water was performed considering spatial and time-line variations. The spatial analysis of CECs showed that three sun agents and caffeine represent the biggest proportion of CECs in the Malaga Mediterranean coastal area, ranging from 0.391 to 0.495 ng/L. The time-line analysis did not show any upward or downward trend in CEC concentration. The mesocosm study comprised a separate evaluation of micro- and macrofouling that showed similar profiles, in which the sun agents presented the highest concentrations. While certain compounds were detected at comparable levels in both fouling types, such as clotrimazole around 0.001 ng/L, others exhibited significant differences in concentration, like caffeine. The passive sampling was also performed, obtaining similar results to those observed in the biofilm mesocosm macrofouling. Finally, all the obtained results from the different samplings were statistically compared, showing that passive sampling presented greater similarities with macrofouling and that there are significant differences between the sampling approach employed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Xenobiotics publishes original studies concerning the beneficial (pharmacology) and detrimental effects (toxicology) of xenobiotics in all organisms. A xenobiotic (“stranger to life”) is defined as a chemical that is not usually found at significant concentrations or expected to reside for long periods in organisms. In addition to man-made chemicals, natural products could also be of interest if they have potent biological properties, special medicinal properties or that a given organism is at risk of exposure in the environment. Topics dealing with abiotic- and biotic-based transformations in various media (xenobiochemistry) and environmental toxicology are also of interest. Areas of interests include the identification of key physical and chemical properties of molecules that predict biological effects and persistence in the environment; the molecular mode of action of xenobiotics; biochemical and physiological interactions leading to change in organism health; pathophysiological interactions of natural and synthetic chemicals; development of biochemical indicators including new “-omics” approaches to identify biomarkers of exposure or effects for xenobiotics.