亚美尼亚埃里温母亲对麻疹疫苗的犹豫:一项定性研究。

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health Research Pub Date : 2025-09-19 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1177/22799036251376852
Tamara Sedrakyan, Zhanna Sargsyan, Tsovinar Harutyunyan
{"title":"亚美尼亚埃里温母亲对麻疹疫苗的犹豫:一项定性研究。","authors":"Tamara Sedrakyan, Zhanna Sargsyan, Tsovinar Harutyunyan","doi":"10.1177/22799036251376852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Measles is a highly contagious disease with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly among children under five. Despite the availability of an effective vaccine, in 2022, 22 million children worldwide missed their first dose and 11 million missed their second. This study aimed to explore the reasons for measles vaccine refusal and delay among mothers of young children in Yerevan, Armenia, using the constructs from the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight mothers of children aged 13-36 months were recruited through convenience and snowball sampling. In-depth interviews examined their beliefs about measles and vaccination, perceived social norms, and sources of information. A thematic analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although participants generally understood measles' severity and transmissibility, many believed their children's natural immunity was sufficient protection. Concerns about vaccine safety and effectiveness were common. Despite reporting no structural barriers and expressing trust in individual healthcare providers, participants exhibited a broader mistrust of health institutions. Social media was a key source of anti-vaccine messaging, while family norms strongly influenced vaccination decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed that vaccine hesitancy among participants was primarily driven by a strong belief in natural immunity, mistrust in health institutions, and the influence of misinformation on social media. To improve vaccine uptake in Armenia and similar contexts, it is essential to rebuild public trust in health authorities and actively counter false information, particularly on social media platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"14 3","pages":"22799036251376852"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measles vaccine hesitancy among mothers in Yerevan, Armenia: A qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Sedrakyan, Zhanna Sargsyan, Tsovinar Harutyunyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22799036251376852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Measles is a highly contagious disease with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly among children under five. Despite the availability of an effective vaccine, in 2022, 22 million children worldwide missed their first dose and 11 million missed their second. This study aimed to explore the reasons for measles vaccine refusal and delay among mothers of young children in Yerevan, Armenia, using the constructs from the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight mothers of children aged 13-36 months were recruited through convenience and snowball sampling. In-depth interviews examined their beliefs about measles and vaccination, perceived social norms, and sources of information. A thematic analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although participants generally understood measles' severity and transmissibility, many believed their children's natural immunity was sufficient protection. Concerns about vaccine safety and effectiveness were common. Despite reporting no structural barriers and expressing trust in individual healthcare providers, participants exhibited a broader mistrust of health institutions. Social media was a key source of anti-vaccine messaging, while family norms strongly influenced vaccination decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed that vaccine hesitancy among participants was primarily driven by a strong belief in natural immunity, mistrust in health institutions, and the influence of misinformation on social media. To improve vaccine uptake in Armenia and similar contexts, it is essential to rebuild public trust in health authorities and actively counter false information, particularly on social media platforms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Research\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"22799036251376852\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449631/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036251376852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036251376852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:麻疹是一种高度传染性疾病,发病率和死亡率很高,特别是在五岁以下儿童中。尽管已有有效疫苗,但在2022年,全球仍有2200万儿童未接种第一剂疫苗,1100万儿童未接种第二剂疫苗。本研究旨在运用健康信念模型和计划行为理论的构式,探讨亚美尼亚埃里温地区幼儿母亲拒绝和延迟接种麻疹疫苗的原因。方法:采用方便抽样和滚雪球抽样的方法,对8名13 ~ 36月龄儿童的母亲进行调查。深入访谈考察了他们对麻疹和疫苗接种的看法、感知到的社会规范和信息来源。进行了专题分析。结果:虽然参与者普遍了解麻疹的严重性和传染性,但许多人认为他们的孩子的自然免疫是足够的保护。对疫苗安全性和有效性的担忧很普遍。尽管报告没有结构性障碍,并对个别医疗保健提供者表示信任,但参与者对医疗机构表现出更广泛的不信任。社交媒体是反疫苗信息的主要来源,而家庭规范对疫苗接种决定有很大影响。结论:该研究表明,参与者对疫苗的犹豫主要是由对自然免疫力的强烈信念、对卫生机构的不信任以及社交媒体上错误信息的影响所驱动的。为了改善亚美尼亚和类似情况下的疫苗接种情况,必须重建公众对卫生当局的信任,并积极打击虚假信息,特别是在社交媒体平台上的虚假信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Measles vaccine hesitancy among mothers in Yerevan, Armenia: A qualitative study.

Measles vaccine hesitancy among mothers in Yerevan, Armenia: A qualitative study.

Measles vaccine hesitancy among mothers in Yerevan, Armenia: A qualitative study.

Measles vaccine hesitancy among mothers in Yerevan, Armenia: A qualitative study.

Objective: Measles is a highly contagious disease with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly among children under five. Despite the availability of an effective vaccine, in 2022, 22 million children worldwide missed their first dose and 11 million missed their second. This study aimed to explore the reasons for measles vaccine refusal and delay among mothers of young children in Yerevan, Armenia, using the constructs from the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior.

Methods: Eight mothers of children aged 13-36 months were recruited through convenience and snowball sampling. In-depth interviews examined their beliefs about measles and vaccination, perceived social norms, and sources of information. A thematic analysis was conducted.

Results: Although participants generally understood measles' severity and transmissibility, many believed their children's natural immunity was sufficient protection. Concerns about vaccine safety and effectiveness were common. Despite reporting no structural barriers and expressing trust in individual healthcare providers, participants exhibited a broader mistrust of health institutions. Social media was a key source of anti-vaccine messaging, while family norms strongly influenced vaccination decisions.

Conclusion: The study revealed that vaccine hesitancy among participants was primarily driven by a strong belief in natural immunity, mistrust in health institutions, and the influence of misinformation on social media. To improve vaccine uptake in Armenia and similar contexts, it is essential to rebuild public trust in health authorities and actively counter false information, particularly on social media platforms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Research
Journal of Public Health Research PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信