保护我们,而不是“来自我们”:来自Cree-Anishnaabe、Dene/ msamutis和Hul'q'umi'num医师领袖关于超越假定的仁慈的观点。

Q3 Medicine
Marcia Anderson, Danièle Behn Smith, Shannon Waters
{"title":"保护我们,而不是“来自我们”:来自Cree-Anishnaabe、Dene/ msamutis和Hul'q'umi'num医师领袖关于超越假定的仁慈的观点。","authors":"Marcia Anderson, Danièle Behn Smith, Shannon Waters","doi":"10.1177/08404704251363775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role that a government can or should play in a public health crisis or in the health of the public can only be understood by considering how it has defined its role in the past and the impacts that has caused. While many might assume that government-led public health has been net beneficial and universal in its intents and approaches across the population of Canada, the history of Indian healthcare tells a different story. We are a trio of Cree-Anishnaabe, Dene/Métis, and Hul'q'umi'num' physician leaders who believe that the role of governments in the health of the public, including during crisis, should be to protect and advance the health of all. In our experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, we witnessed settler governments uphold historical public health paradigms that undermined the inherent rights of First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples. We also witnessed pockets of transformation where rights-based frameworks and anti-racist approaches were implemented that resulted in better outcomes for First Nations and Métis Peoples. We believe that for settler governments to protect and advance health for all, assumptions of exhaustive and benevolent jurisdiction over Indigenous Peoples and lands must be dismantled to create new, unfamiliar, co-governance models.</p>","PeriodicalId":39854,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Management Forum","volume":" ","pages":"8404704251363775"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protection for us not \\\"from us\\\": Perspectives from Cree-Anishnaabe, Dene/Métis, and Hul'q'umi'num' physician leaders on moving beyond assumed benevolence.\",\"authors\":\"Marcia Anderson, Danièle Behn Smith, Shannon Waters\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08404704251363775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The role that a government can or should play in a public health crisis or in the health of the public can only be understood by considering how it has defined its role in the past and the impacts that has caused. While many might assume that government-led public health has been net beneficial and universal in its intents and approaches across the population of Canada, the history of Indian healthcare tells a different story. We are a trio of Cree-Anishnaabe, Dene/Métis, and Hul'q'umi'num' physician leaders who believe that the role of governments in the health of the public, including during crisis, should be to protect and advance the health of all. In our experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, we witnessed settler governments uphold historical public health paradigms that undermined the inherent rights of First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples. We also witnessed pockets of transformation where rights-based frameworks and anti-racist approaches were implemented that resulted in better outcomes for First Nations and Métis Peoples. We believe that for settler governments to protect and advance health for all, assumptions of exhaustive and benevolent jurisdiction over Indigenous Peoples and lands must be dismantled to create new, unfamiliar, co-governance models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Management Forum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8404704251363775\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Management Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704251363775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Management Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704251363775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政府在公共卫生危机或公众健康中能够或应该发挥的作用,只能通过考虑政府过去如何界定其作用及其造成的影响来理解。虽然许多人可能认为政府主导的公共卫生在加拿大人口中的意图和方法是净有益和普遍的,但印度医疗保健的历史讲述了一个不同的故事。我们是由Cree-Anishnaabe、Dene/ msamutis和Hul'q'umi'num医师领袖组成的三人组,他们认为政府在公众健康方面的作用,包括在危机期间的作用,应该是保护和促进所有人的健康。根据我们在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的经验,我们目睹了定居者政府坚持历史上的公共卫生范式,损害了第一民族、因纽特人和姆萨迪斯人的固有权利。我们还目睹了一些变革,在这些变革中,基于权利的框架和反种族主义的方法得到了实施,为第一民族和土著人民带来了更好的结果。我们认为,定居者政府要保护和促进所有人的健康,就必须打破对土著人民和土地进行详尽和仁慈管辖的假设,创造新的、不熟悉的共同治理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protection for us not "from us": Perspectives from Cree-Anishnaabe, Dene/Métis, and Hul'q'umi'num' physician leaders on moving beyond assumed benevolence.

The role that a government can or should play in a public health crisis or in the health of the public can only be understood by considering how it has defined its role in the past and the impacts that has caused. While many might assume that government-led public health has been net beneficial and universal in its intents and approaches across the population of Canada, the history of Indian healthcare tells a different story. We are a trio of Cree-Anishnaabe, Dene/Métis, and Hul'q'umi'num' physician leaders who believe that the role of governments in the health of the public, including during crisis, should be to protect and advance the health of all. In our experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, we witnessed settler governments uphold historical public health paradigms that undermined the inherent rights of First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples. We also witnessed pockets of transformation where rights-based frameworks and anti-racist approaches were implemented that resulted in better outcomes for First Nations and Métis Peoples. We believe that for settler governments to protect and advance health for all, assumptions of exhaustive and benevolent jurisdiction over Indigenous Peoples and lands must be dismantled to create new, unfamiliar, co-governance models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Management Forum
Healthcare Management Forum Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Healthcare Management Forum is the official journal of the Canadian College of Health Service Executives. It is the only peer-reviewed journal that covers issues related to advances in health services management, theory and practice in a Canadian context. The quality of its contributors, the rigorous review process and the leading-edge topics make it truly unique!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信