南非HIV感染者多来替韦与洛匹那韦二线抗逆转录病毒治疗的吸收和24个月结局:一项回顾性队列研究和模拟靶标试验

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-08-30 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf530
Jennifer Anne Brown, Lara Lewis, Yukteshwar Sookrajh, Lungile Hobe, Thulani Ngwenya, Johan van der Molen, Kwabena Asare, Kwena Tlhaku, Mlungisi Khanyile, Thokozani Khubone, Christian Bottomley, Nigel Garrett, Jienchi Dorward
{"title":"南非HIV感染者多来替韦与洛匹那韦二线抗逆转录病毒治疗的吸收和24个月结局:一项回顾性队列研究和模拟靶标试验","authors":"Jennifer Anne Brown, Lara Lewis, Yukteshwar Sookrajh, Lungile Hobe, Thulani Ngwenya, Johan van der Molen, Kwabena Asare, Kwena Tlhaku, Mlungisi Khanyile, Thokozani Khubone, Christian Bottomley, Nigel Garrett, Jienchi Dorward","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aligning with the World Health Organization, South Africa has replaced ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) with dolutegravir (DTG) in second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) after treatment failure with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/lamivudine or emtricitabine (XTC)/efavirenz (EFV). Initial guidance included special considerations for DTG use among women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed routine deidentified data of adults switched from TDF/XTC/EFV to second-line AZT/XTC/LPV/r, AZT/XTC/DTG, or TDF/XTC/DTG between December 2019 and December 2023 at 108 healthcare facilities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Among people switched before July 2021, we emulated a target trial comparing 24-month death or loss to follow-up (LTFU), and viremia (>50 copies/mL). We conducted intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses using weighted logistic regression with bootstrapped CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, women were less likely than men to switch to DTG (RR: 0.92 [95% CI: .88, .96]; <i>N</i> = 3649). Of 2321 people switched before July 2021, 915 (39%) switched to AZT/XTC/LPV/r, 415 (18%) to zidovudine (AZT)/XTC/DTG, and 991 (43%) to TDF/XTC/DTG. Median age was 36 years (IQR: 30, 43) and 1364 (59%) were women. In intention-to-treat analyses, the standardized 24-month risk of death or LTFU was similar with AZT/XTC/LPV/r (31%), AZT/XTC/DTG (30%), and TDF/XTC/DTG (34%). The standardized risk of 24-month viremia among those retained in care with a viral load result (<i>N</i> = 1270) was higher with AZT/XTC/LPV/r (50%) than with AZT/XTC/DTG (40%; aRD: -10% [95% CI -19%, -2%]) or TDF/XTC/DTG (39%; aRD: -11% [95% CI -18%, -5%]). Per-protocol analyses gave similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While retention was similar across regimens, viremia was less common on DTG-based ART, supporting current guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 9","pages":"ofaf530"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uptake and 24-month Outcomes of Dolutegravir- Versus Lopinavir-based Second-line Antiretroviral Therapy for People With HIV in South Africa: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Emulated Target Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Anne Brown, Lara Lewis, Yukteshwar Sookrajh, Lungile Hobe, Thulani Ngwenya, Johan van der Molen, Kwabena Asare, Kwena Tlhaku, Mlungisi Khanyile, Thokozani Khubone, Christian Bottomley, Nigel Garrett, Jienchi Dorward\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ofid/ofaf530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aligning with the World Health Organization, South Africa has replaced ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) with dolutegravir (DTG) in second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) after treatment failure with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/lamivudine or emtricitabine (XTC)/efavirenz (EFV). Initial guidance included special considerations for DTG use among women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed routine deidentified data of adults switched from TDF/XTC/EFV to second-line AZT/XTC/LPV/r, AZT/XTC/DTG, or TDF/XTC/DTG between December 2019 and December 2023 at 108 healthcare facilities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Among people switched before July 2021, we emulated a target trial comparing 24-month death or loss to follow-up (LTFU), and viremia (>50 copies/mL). We conducted intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses using weighted logistic regression with bootstrapped CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, women were less likely than men to switch to DTG (RR: 0.92 [95% CI: .88, .96]; <i>N</i> = 3649). Of 2321 people switched before July 2021, 915 (39%) switched to AZT/XTC/LPV/r, 415 (18%) to zidovudine (AZT)/XTC/DTG, and 991 (43%) to TDF/XTC/DTG. Median age was 36 years (IQR: 30, 43) and 1364 (59%) were women. In intention-to-treat analyses, the standardized 24-month risk of death or LTFU was similar with AZT/XTC/LPV/r (31%), AZT/XTC/DTG (30%), and TDF/XTC/DTG (34%). The standardized risk of 24-month viremia among those retained in care with a viral load result (<i>N</i> = 1270) was higher with AZT/XTC/LPV/r (50%) than with AZT/XTC/DTG (40%; aRD: -10% [95% CI -19%, -2%]) or TDF/XTC/DTG (39%; aRD: -11% [95% CI -18%, -5%]). Per-protocol analyses gave similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While retention was similar across regimens, viremia was less common on DTG-based ART, supporting current guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"ofaf530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448401/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf530\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与世界卫生组织一致,南非在用富马酸替诺福韦二氧吡酯(TDF)/拉米夫定或恩曲他滨(XTC)/依非韦伦(EFV)治疗失败后,将利托那韦增强的洛匹那韦(LPV/r)替换为dolutegravir (DTG)用于二线抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)。最初的指导包括对妇女使用双甘油三酯的特别考虑。方法:我们分析了2019年12月至2023年12月在南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省108家医疗机构中从TDF/XTC/EFV切换到二线AZT/XTC/LPV/r、AZT/XTC/DTG或TDF/XTC/DTG的成人常规确定数据。在2021年7月之前转换的患者中,我们模拟了一项比较24个月死亡或随访损失(LTFU)和病毒血症(bbb50拷贝/mL)的目标试验。我们使用带有自举ci的加权逻辑回归进行了意向治疗和协议分析。结果:总体而言,女性比男性更不可能转向DTG (RR: 0.92 [95% CI:])。88 .96点);N = 3649)。在2021年7月之前切换的2321人中,915人(39%)切换到AZT/XTC/LPV/r, 415人(18%)切换到齐多夫定(AZT)/XTC/DTG, 991人(43%)切换到TDF/XTC/DTG。中位年龄为36岁(IQR: 30,43),女性1364例(59%)。在意向治疗分析中,标准化的24个月死亡或LTFU风险与AZT/XTC/LPV/r(31%)、AZT/XTC/DTG(30%)和TDF/XTC/DTG(34%)相似。在病毒载量结果(N = 1270)的留观患者中,AZT/XTC/LPV/r组24个月病毒血症的标准化风险(50%)高于AZT/XTC/DTG组(40%;aRD: -10% [95% CI -19%, -2%])或TDF/XTC/DTG组(39%;aRD: -11% [95% CI -18%, -5%])。每个协议的分析也给出了类似的结果。结论:虽然不同方案的滞留率相似,但基于dtg的ART治疗中病毒血症的发生率较低,支持当前指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Uptake and 24-month Outcomes of Dolutegravir- Versus Lopinavir-based Second-line Antiretroviral Therapy for People With HIV in South Africa: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Emulated Target Trial.

Uptake and 24-month Outcomes of Dolutegravir- Versus Lopinavir-based Second-line Antiretroviral Therapy for People With HIV in South Africa: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Emulated Target Trial.

Background: Aligning with the World Health Organization, South Africa has replaced ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) with dolutegravir (DTG) in second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) after treatment failure with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/lamivudine or emtricitabine (XTC)/efavirenz (EFV). Initial guidance included special considerations for DTG use among women.

Methods: We analyzed routine deidentified data of adults switched from TDF/XTC/EFV to second-line AZT/XTC/LPV/r, AZT/XTC/DTG, or TDF/XTC/DTG between December 2019 and December 2023 at 108 healthcare facilities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Among people switched before July 2021, we emulated a target trial comparing 24-month death or loss to follow-up (LTFU), and viremia (>50 copies/mL). We conducted intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses using weighted logistic regression with bootstrapped CIs.

Results: Overall, women were less likely than men to switch to DTG (RR: 0.92 [95% CI: .88, .96]; N = 3649). Of 2321 people switched before July 2021, 915 (39%) switched to AZT/XTC/LPV/r, 415 (18%) to zidovudine (AZT)/XTC/DTG, and 991 (43%) to TDF/XTC/DTG. Median age was 36 years (IQR: 30, 43) and 1364 (59%) were women. In intention-to-treat analyses, the standardized 24-month risk of death or LTFU was similar with AZT/XTC/LPV/r (31%), AZT/XTC/DTG (30%), and TDF/XTC/DTG (34%). The standardized risk of 24-month viremia among those retained in care with a viral load result (N = 1270) was higher with AZT/XTC/LPV/r (50%) than with AZT/XTC/DTG (40%; aRD: -10% [95% CI -19%, -2%]) or TDF/XTC/DTG (39%; aRD: -11% [95% CI -18%, -5%]). Per-protocol analyses gave similar results.

Conclusions: While retention was similar across regimens, viremia was less common on DTG-based ART, supporting current guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信