瘢痕对高分化甲状腺癌患者生活质量的影响:一项系统综述。

IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
OTO Open Pub Date : 2025-09-19 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1002/oto2.70155
Aníbal Ariza, Alvaro Sanabria
{"title":"瘢痕对高分化甲状腺癌患者生活质量的影响:一项系统综述。","authors":"Aníbal Ariza, Alvaro Sanabria","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Remote access techniques in thyroid surgery have been developed to improve cosmetic outcomes, based on the presumed impact of surgical scars on patients' quality of life (QoL). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of surgical scars on the overall QoL of patients who have undergone thyroidectomy for low-risk thyroid carcinoma. The review focuses on the rank of scar-related QoL issues relative to other aspects assessed by validated QoL instruments.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, LILACS, Google Scholar (no language or time restrictions).</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted for original articles using validated QoL instruments with scar-related domains in thyroid cancer patients who had undergone OT. Study quality was assessed using the JBI critical appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies. Data were analyzed from 14 patient groups across 9 studies, representing 3658 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 12 of 14 samples, scar-related issues ranked lower than sixth place in QoL assessments, with 7 samples placing scar-related items at the lowest position. The Thyca-Qol questionnaire was the most commonly used tool, though most studies had limitations, including selection and recall biases. However, across geographically and culturally diverse populations, scar-related concerns consistently ranked lower in importance compared to other QoL factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The impact of surgical scars on QoL in thyroid cancer survivors is low, with scar-related items ranking among the least significant issues. Remote access techniques designed primarily for cosmetic outcomes should demonstrate additional benefits to justify their use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 3","pages":"e70155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12447349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Scar on Quality of Life in Well-Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Aníbal Ariza, Alvaro Sanabria\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/oto2.70155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Remote access techniques in thyroid surgery have been developed to improve cosmetic outcomes, based on the presumed impact of surgical scars on patients' quality of life (QoL). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of surgical scars on the overall QoL of patients who have undergone thyroidectomy for low-risk thyroid carcinoma. The review focuses on the rank of scar-related QoL issues relative to other aspects assessed by validated QoL instruments.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, LILACS, Google Scholar (no language or time restrictions).</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted for original articles using validated QoL instruments with scar-related domains in thyroid cancer patients who had undergone OT. Study quality was assessed using the JBI critical appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies. Data were analyzed from 14 patient groups across 9 studies, representing 3658 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 12 of 14 samples, scar-related issues ranked lower than sixth place in QoL assessments, with 7 samples placing scar-related items at the lowest position. The Thyca-Qol questionnaire was the most commonly used tool, though most studies had limitations, including selection and recall biases. However, across geographically and culturally diverse populations, scar-related concerns consistently ranked lower in importance compared to other QoL factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The impact of surgical scars on QoL in thyroid cancer survivors is low, with scar-related items ranking among the least significant issues. Remote access techniques designed primarily for cosmetic outcomes should demonstrate additional benefits to justify their use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OTO Open\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"e70155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12447349/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OTO Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:基于手术疤痕对患者生活质量(QoL)的影响,甲状腺手术中的远程访问技术已经发展到改善美容效果。本系统综述旨在评估手术疤痕对低危甲状腺癌行甲状腺切除术患者总体生活质量的影响。回顾的重点是与疤痕相关的生活质量问题相对于经验证的生活质量工具评估的其他方面的排名。数据来源:MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, LILACS,谷歌Scholar(无语言和时间限制)。综述方法:系统综述了使用经过验证的带有疤痕相关域的甲状腺癌患者行OT的生活质量仪器的原始文章。研究质量评估使用JBI关键评估工具进行横断面研究。数据分析来自9项研究的14组患者,代表3658名患者。结果:在14个样本中,有12个样本的疤痕相关问题在生活质量评估中排名低于第六位,其中7个样本将疤痕相关问题排在最低位置。Thyca-Qol问卷是最常用的工具,尽管大多数研究都有局限性,包括选择和回忆偏差。然而,在地域和文化多样化的人群中,与其他生活质量因素相比,与疤痕相关的担忧始终排名较低。结论:手术疤痕对甲状腺癌幸存者生活质量的影响较低,疤痕相关项目是最不显著的问题。主要为美容效果设计的远程访问技术应该展示额外的好处,以证明其使用的合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of Scar on Quality of Life in Well-Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Impact of Scar on Quality of Life in Well-Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Impact of Scar on Quality of Life in Well-Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Objective: Remote access techniques in thyroid surgery have been developed to improve cosmetic outcomes, based on the presumed impact of surgical scars on patients' quality of life (QoL). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of surgical scars on the overall QoL of patients who have undergone thyroidectomy for low-risk thyroid carcinoma. The review focuses on the rank of scar-related QoL issues relative to other aspects assessed by validated QoL instruments.

Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, LILACS, Google Scholar (no language or time restrictions).

Review methods: A systematic review was conducted for original articles using validated QoL instruments with scar-related domains in thyroid cancer patients who had undergone OT. Study quality was assessed using the JBI critical appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies. Data were analyzed from 14 patient groups across 9 studies, representing 3658 patients.

Results: In 12 of 14 samples, scar-related issues ranked lower than sixth place in QoL assessments, with 7 samples placing scar-related items at the lowest position. The Thyca-Qol questionnaire was the most commonly used tool, though most studies had limitations, including selection and recall biases. However, across geographically and culturally diverse populations, scar-related concerns consistently ranked lower in importance compared to other QoL factors.

Conclusions: The impact of surgical scars on QoL in thyroid cancer survivors is low, with scar-related items ranking among the least significant issues. Remote access techniques designed primarily for cosmetic outcomes should demonstrate additional benefits to justify their use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
OTO Open
OTO Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信