数据缺失的新发糖尿病患者胰腺癌EndPAC风险评分的表现-一项针对英国人群的数据库研究

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
C Mellenthin, C R Meier, S S Jick, L H Bühler, M Adamina, C Schneider
{"title":"数据缺失的新发糖尿病患者胰腺癌EndPAC风险评分的表现-一项针对英国人群的数据库研究","authors":"C Mellenthin, C R Meier, S S Jick, L H Bühler, M Adamina, C Schneider","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2025.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>New onset diabetes (NOD) can be a first symptom of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but less than 1 % of NOD are caused by PDAC. The EndPAC score tests for PDAC risk in NOD patients. As necessary information is often missing, the aim of our study was to assess the performance of the score using methods that adjust for missing values so the score can be successfully applied to all patients.</p><p><strong>Patients/methods: </strong>We retrospectively followed a British cohort with NOD in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink until they developed PDAC or were censored. We calculated the EndPAC score in all patients and assessed its performance with different imputation methods for missing values. We calibrated the score for the British population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 197'092 NOD patients. PDAC occurred in 901 cases within 3 years after the diabetes diagnosis. Complete information to calculate the EndPAC score was available for 9.2 % of the patients. In those, the AUC (Area under the Receiver Operating Curve) of the original EndPAC score was 0.76. Including all patients, using the imputation of the population median for missing values, the AUC was 0.69. It improved to 0.71 after calibration to the UK population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of imputation methods enabled us to use the EndPAC score for all NOD patients. However, use of the EndPAC score alone is still not sufficient to select NOD patients for diagnostic workup, with or without complete information. Its use in combination with a biomarker might lead to a better risk-benefit ratio.</p>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of the EndPAC risk score for pancreatic cancer in new onset diabetes patients with missing data - a database study in the British population.\",\"authors\":\"C Mellenthin, C R Meier, S S Jick, L H Bühler, M Adamina, C Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pan.2025.09.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>New onset diabetes (NOD) can be a first symptom of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but less than 1 % of NOD are caused by PDAC. The EndPAC score tests for PDAC risk in NOD patients. As necessary information is often missing, the aim of our study was to assess the performance of the score using methods that adjust for missing values so the score can be successfully applied to all patients.</p><p><strong>Patients/methods: </strong>We retrospectively followed a British cohort with NOD in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink until they developed PDAC or were censored. We calculated the EndPAC score in all patients and assessed its performance with different imputation methods for missing values. We calibrated the score for the British population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 197'092 NOD patients. PDAC occurred in 901 cases within 3 years after the diabetes diagnosis. Complete information to calculate the EndPAC score was available for 9.2 % of the patients. In those, the AUC (Area under the Receiver Operating Curve) of the original EndPAC score was 0.76. Including all patients, using the imputation of the population median for missing values, the AUC was 0.69. It improved to 0.71 after calibration to the UK population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of imputation methods enabled us to use the EndPAC score for all NOD patients. However, use of the EndPAC score alone is still not sufficient to select NOD patients for diagnostic workup, with or without complete information. Its use in combination with a biomarker might lead to a better risk-benefit ratio.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pancreatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pancreatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2025.09.017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2025.09.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新发糖尿病(NOD)可能是胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的首发症状,但只有不到1%的NOD是由PDAC引起的。EndPAC评分检测NOD患者PDAC风险。由于经常缺少必要的信息,我们研究的目的是使用调整缺失值的方法来评估评分的性能,以便评分可以成功地应用于所有患者。患者/方法:我们在临床实践研究数据链中回顾性地跟踪了一组英国NOD患者,直到他们发展为PDAC或被审查。我们计算了所有患者的EndPAC评分,并使用不同的缺失值估算方法评估其表现。我们为英国人校准了分数。结果:我们纳入了197092例NOD患者。901例患者在糖尿病诊断后3年内发生PDAC。9.2%的患者可获得计算EndPAC评分的完整信息。其中,原始EndPAC评分的AUC (Receiver Operating Curve Area under Area)为0.76。包括所有患者,使用缺失值的人口中位数代入,AUC为0.69。对英国人口进行校正后,它提高到0.71。结论:使用归算方法使我们能够对所有NOD患者使用EndPAC评分。然而,单独使用EndPAC评分仍然不足以选择NOD患者进行诊断检查,无论是否有完整的信息。它与生物标志物结合使用可能会带来更好的风险收益比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of the EndPAC risk score for pancreatic cancer in new onset diabetes patients with missing data - a database study in the British population.

Introduction: New onset diabetes (NOD) can be a first symptom of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but less than 1 % of NOD are caused by PDAC. The EndPAC score tests for PDAC risk in NOD patients. As necessary information is often missing, the aim of our study was to assess the performance of the score using methods that adjust for missing values so the score can be successfully applied to all patients.

Patients/methods: We retrospectively followed a British cohort with NOD in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink until they developed PDAC or were censored. We calculated the EndPAC score in all patients and assessed its performance with different imputation methods for missing values. We calibrated the score for the British population.

Results: We included 197'092 NOD patients. PDAC occurred in 901 cases within 3 years after the diabetes diagnosis. Complete information to calculate the EndPAC score was available for 9.2 % of the patients. In those, the AUC (Area under the Receiver Operating Curve) of the original EndPAC score was 0.76. Including all patients, using the imputation of the population median for missing values, the AUC was 0.69. It improved to 0.71 after calibration to the UK population.

Conclusions: Use of imputation methods enabled us to use the EndPAC score for all NOD patients. However, use of the EndPAC score alone is still not sufficient to select NOD patients for diagnostic workup, with or without complete information. Its use in combination with a biomarker might lead to a better risk-benefit ratio.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pancreatology
Pancreatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
194
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信