下第三磨牙手术后使用包膜和卡口皮瓣的临床伤口愈合:一项随机临床试验。

IF 2 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Roberto Pippi, Chiara Mazzei, Alessandra Pietrantoni
{"title":"下第三磨牙手术后使用包膜和卡口皮瓣的临床伤口愈合:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Roberto Pippi, Chiara Mazzei, Alessandra Pietrantoni","doi":"10.3390/mps8050101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study mainly aimed to identify whether the envelope and triangular flaps affected wound healing and patient quality of life differently. Secondarily, the study aimed to investigate whether some anatomical and operational variables may also affect healing.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective randomized study was conducted with 56 fully impacted lower third molars, randomly divided into two groups, one treated with the envelope flap and the other with the bayonet flap. Qualitative variables were transformed into quantitative ones and then analyzed using independent samples <i>t</i>-tests or analysis of variance. An analysis of bivariate correlations with Pearson's coefficient was also used. The chi-square test was used to verify the association between each flap and the categorical variables considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant associations were found between flap types and dehiscence, although the mean dehiscence diameter was consistently greater in the envelope flap group. The maximum diameter of the dehiscence at 14 days was found to be significantly and negatively related to the 14-day wound healing indices. Analyses relating to the quality of life did not show significant associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite some significant healing differences between the two considered flaps exist, they do not have relevant effects on the patient's post-operative quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":18715,"journal":{"name":"Methods and Protocols","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Wound Healing After Lower Third Molar Surgery with Envelope and Bayonet Flaps: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Pippi, Chiara Mazzei, Alessandra Pietrantoni\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/mps8050101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study mainly aimed to identify whether the envelope and triangular flaps affected wound healing and patient quality of life differently. Secondarily, the study aimed to investigate whether some anatomical and operational variables may also affect healing.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective randomized study was conducted with 56 fully impacted lower third molars, randomly divided into two groups, one treated with the envelope flap and the other with the bayonet flap. Qualitative variables were transformed into quantitative ones and then analyzed using independent samples <i>t</i>-tests or analysis of variance. An analysis of bivariate correlations with Pearson's coefficient was also used. The chi-square test was used to verify the association between each flap and the categorical variables considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant associations were found between flap types and dehiscence, although the mean dehiscence diameter was consistently greater in the envelope flap group. The maximum diameter of the dehiscence at 14 days was found to be significantly and negatively related to the 14-day wound healing indices. Analyses relating to the quality of life did not show significant associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite some significant healing differences between the two considered flaps exist, they do not have relevant effects on the patient's post-operative quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods and Protocols\",\"volume\":\"8 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452354/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods and Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/mps8050101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mps8050101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的主要目的是确定包膜皮瓣和三角皮瓣对伤口愈合和患者生活质量的影响是否不同。其次,该研究旨在探讨一些解剖和操作变量是否也可能影响愈合。研究设计:对56颗完全阻生的下三磨牙进行前瞻性随机研究,随机分为两组,一组用包膜瓣治疗,另一组用卡口瓣治疗。将定性变量转化为定量变量,然后采用独立样本t检验或方差分析进行分析。还使用了与皮尔逊系数的双变量相关性分析。卡方检验用于验证每个皮瓣与所考虑的分类变量之间的关联。结果:尽管包膜皮瓣组的平均裂口直径一贯较大,但皮瓣类型与裂口之间无统计学意义的关联。14 d时最大裂径与14 d创面愈合指数呈显著负相关。与生活质量有关的分析没有显示出显著的关联。结论:尽管两种皮瓣之间存在明显的愈合差异,但它们对患者术后生活质量没有相关影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Wound Healing After Lower Third Molar Surgery with Envelope and Bayonet Flaps: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Objectives: The present study mainly aimed to identify whether the envelope and triangular flaps affected wound healing and patient quality of life differently. Secondarily, the study aimed to investigate whether some anatomical and operational variables may also affect healing.

Study design: A prospective randomized study was conducted with 56 fully impacted lower third molars, randomly divided into two groups, one treated with the envelope flap and the other with the bayonet flap. Qualitative variables were transformed into quantitative ones and then analyzed using independent samples t-tests or analysis of variance. An analysis of bivariate correlations with Pearson's coefficient was also used. The chi-square test was used to verify the association between each flap and the categorical variables considered.

Results: No statistically significant associations were found between flap types and dehiscence, although the mean dehiscence diameter was consistently greater in the envelope flap group. The maximum diameter of the dehiscence at 14 days was found to be significantly and negatively related to the 14-day wound healing indices. Analyses relating to the quality of life did not show significant associations.

Conclusions: Despite some significant healing differences between the two considered flaps exist, they do not have relevant effects on the patient's post-operative quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Methods and Protocols
Methods and Protocols Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信