直立脊柱平面与胸肌神经阻滞在癌症患者乳房切除术中的应用:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-09-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S538581
Edward N Yap, Julia Wei, Curtis Darling, Elizabeth Linehan, Matthias Behrends, Kevin P Ng
{"title":"直立脊柱平面与胸肌神经阻滞在癌症患者乳房切除术中的应用:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。","authors":"Edward N Yap, Julia Wei, Curtis Darling, Elizabeth Linehan, Matthias Behrends, Kevin P Ng","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S538581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mastectomy patients require effective acute postoperative pain management. Regional anesthesia techniques such as fascial plane blocks are important pain treatment modalities to address pain control. This study compared the effects of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block versus the pectoralis nerve (PECS) block in providing postoperative analgesia for mastectomy patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 517 breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy from 2017 to 2020, with 428 receiving a PECS block and 89 an ESP block. The primary outcome examined was total opioid use during hospital stay measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) pain scores, PACU postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), 30-day readmission rates, and development of postmastectomy pain within six months of surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in median total opioid use between the ESP (53 MME (IQR: 38-80 MME)) and PECS (60 MME (IQR: 30-82.5 MME)) groups. Multivariable analysis confirmed no difference in total opioid consumption. There was no significant difference between the two groups in PACU average and maximum pain scores, PACU PONV, hospital length of stay, 30-day hospital readmission, and development of postmastectomy pain within six months of surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the PECS block, the ESP block demonstrated no significant difference in acute pain outcomes and recovery in patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer, with similar hospital discharge times and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"4775-4785"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Erector Spinae Plane versus Pectoralis Nerve Block for Mastectomy in Cancer Patients: A Retrospective, Multicenter Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Edward N Yap, Julia Wei, Curtis Darling, Elizabeth Linehan, Matthias Behrends, Kevin P Ng\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S538581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mastectomy patients require effective acute postoperative pain management. Regional anesthesia techniques such as fascial plane blocks are important pain treatment modalities to address pain control. This study compared the effects of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block versus the pectoralis nerve (PECS) block in providing postoperative analgesia for mastectomy patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 517 breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy from 2017 to 2020, with 428 receiving a PECS block and 89 an ESP block. The primary outcome examined was total opioid use during hospital stay measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) pain scores, PACU postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), 30-day readmission rates, and development of postmastectomy pain within six months of surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in median total opioid use between the ESP (53 MME (IQR: 38-80 MME)) and PECS (60 MME (IQR: 30-82.5 MME)) groups. Multivariable analysis confirmed no difference in total opioid consumption. There was no significant difference between the two groups in PACU average and maximum pain scores, PACU PONV, hospital length of stay, 30-day hospital readmission, and development of postmastectomy pain within six months of surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the PECS block, the ESP block demonstrated no significant difference in acute pain outcomes and recovery in patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer, with similar hospital discharge times and long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"4775-4785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449883/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S538581\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S538581","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳房切除术患者需要有效的急性术后疼痛管理。区域麻醉技术如筋膜平面阻滞是解决疼痛控制的重要疼痛治疗方式。本研究比较竖脊平面阻滞与胸肌神经阻滞对乳房切除术患者术后镇痛的影响。方法:本回顾性研究纳入2017年至2020年517例接受乳房切除术的乳腺癌患者,其中428例接受PECS阻滞,89例接受ESP阻滞。研究的主要结局是以吗啡毫克当量(MME)衡量的住院期间阿片类药物总使用量。次要结局包括住院时间、麻醉后护理单元(PACU)疼痛评分、PACU术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)、30天再入院率和术后6个月内乳房切除术后疼痛的发生。结果:ESP组(53 MME (IQR: 38-80 MME))和PECS组(60 MME (IQR: 30-82.5 MME))的阿片类药物总使用量中位数无显著差异。多变量分析证实阿片类药物总消费量没有差异。两组在PACU平均和最大疼痛评分、PACU PONV、住院时间、30天再入院以及术后6个月内乳房切除术后疼痛的发展方面无显著差异。结论:与PECS阻滞相比,ESP阻滞在乳腺癌乳房切除术患者的急性疼痛结局和恢复方面无显著差异,出院时间和长期预后相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Erector Spinae Plane versus Pectoralis Nerve Block for Mastectomy in Cancer Patients: A Retrospective, Multicenter Cohort Study.

Erector Spinae Plane versus Pectoralis Nerve Block for Mastectomy in Cancer Patients: A Retrospective, Multicenter Cohort Study.

Background: Mastectomy patients require effective acute postoperative pain management. Regional anesthesia techniques such as fascial plane blocks are important pain treatment modalities to address pain control. This study compared the effects of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block versus the pectoralis nerve (PECS) block in providing postoperative analgesia for mastectomy patients.

Methods: This retrospective study included 517 breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy from 2017 to 2020, with 428 receiving a PECS block and 89 an ESP block. The primary outcome examined was total opioid use during hospital stay measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) pain scores, PACU postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), 30-day readmission rates, and development of postmastectomy pain within six months of surgery.

Results: No significant difference in median total opioid use between the ESP (53 MME (IQR: 38-80 MME)) and PECS (60 MME (IQR: 30-82.5 MME)) groups. Multivariable analysis confirmed no difference in total opioid consumption. There was no significant difference between the two groups in PACU average and maximum pain scores, PACU PONV, hospital length of stay, 30-day hospital readmission, and development of postmastectomy pain within six months of surgery.

Conclusion: Compared to the PECS block, the ESP block demonstrated no significant difference in acute pain outcomes and recovery in patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer, with similar hospital discharge times and long-term outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信