{"title":"针刺和针刺结合治疗腰椎间盘突出症坐骨神经痛的疗效和安全性:一项网络meta分析。","authors":"Dongyi Ni, Haiyang Tong, Shen Wei, Yitong Zheng, Wenyan Wu, Min Li, Yunpeng Dong","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S542831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sciatica is a common complication of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). This network meta-analysis compared the efficacy of acupuncture monotherapies, acupuncture versus conventional rehabilitation, and acupuncture monotherapy versus combination therapies for LDH-related sciatica.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, CQVIP, and CBM. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using RStudio and GEMTC. STATA generated network and funnel plots. Treatment rankings were assessed using the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA). Bias risk was evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to SUCRA, in terms of total effective rate, the more effective intervention was electroacupuncture combined with cupping therapy (EA+Cupping, 92.93%); in terms of VAS, the better intervention was needle knife combined with rehabilitation therapy (NK+RT, 95.96%); in terms of ODI, the more effective intervention was electroacupuncture combined with cupping therapy (EA+Cupping, 98.03%); in terms of JOA, the best intervention was electrostimulation combined with rehabilitation therapy (ES+RT, 88.27%); in terms of IL-6 and TNF-α, the better intervention was electroacupuncture combined with electrostimulation (EA+ES, 99.99%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acupuncture combined with other therapies demonstrates superior efficacy compared to rehabilitation treatment. Specifically, NK+RT is possibly a more effective intervention for pain relief; EA+Cupping shows a better benefit in improving disability and quality of life; ES+RT is likely a more effective strategy for promoting neurological recovery; and EA+ES is possibly better in reducing inflammatory responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"4809-4832"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture and Acupuncture-Combined Therapies in the Treatment of Sciatica Caused by Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Dongyi Ni, Haiyang Tong, Shen Wei, Yitong Zheng, Wenyan Wu, Min Li, Yunpeng Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S542831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sciatica is a common complication of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). This network meta-analysis compared the efficacy of acupuncture monotherapies, acupuncture versus conventional rehabilitation, and acupuncture monotherapy versus combination therapies for LDH-related sciatica.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, CQVIP, and CBM. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using RStudio and GEMTC. STATA generated network and funnel plots. Treatment rankings were assessed using the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA). Bias risk was evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to SUCRA, in terms of total effective rate, the more effective intervention was electroacupuncture combined with cupping therapy (EA+Cupping, 92.93%); in terms of VAS, the better intervention was needle knife combined with rehabilitation therapy (NK+RT, 95.96%); in terms of ODI, the more effective intervention was electroacupuncture combined with cupping therapy (EA+Cupping, 98.03%); in terms of JOA, the best intervention was electrostimulation combined with rehabilitation therapy (ES+RT, 88.27%); in terms of IL-6 and TNF-α, the better intervention was electroacupuncture combined with electrostimulation (EA+ES, 99.99%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acupuncture combined with other therapies demonstrates superior efficacy compared to rehabilitation treatment. Specifically, NK+RT is possibly a more effective intervention for pain relief; EA+Cupping shows a better benefit in improving disability and quality of life; ES+RT is likely a more effective strategy for promoting neurological recovery; and EA+ES is possibly better in reducing inflammatory responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"4809-4832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450027/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S542831\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S542831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:坐骨神经痛是腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的常见并发症。该网络荟萃分析比较了针刺单一疗法、针刺与传统康复、针刺单一疗法与联合疗法治疗ldh相关坐骨神经痛的疗效。患者和方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CNKI、万方、CQVIP、CBM。使用RStudio和GEMTC进行贝叶斯网络元分析。STATA生成网络和漏斗图。采用累积排名曲线下表面(SUCRA)评估处理排名。使用Cochrane risk of Bias工具2.0评估偏倚风险。结果:根据SUCRA,从总有效率来看,电针+拔罐干预更有效(EA+拔罐,92.93%);VAS方面,针刀联合康复治疗干预效果较好(NK+RT, 95.96%);在ODI方面,电针+拔罐干预效果更好(EA+拔罐占98.03%);在JOA方面,电刺激联合康复治疗干预效果最好(ES+RT, 88.27%);在IL-6和TNF-α方面,电针联合电刺激干预效果更好(EA+ES, 99.99%)。结论:与康复治疗相比,针刺联合其他疗法疗效显著。具体来说,NK+RT可能是一种更有效的缓解疼痛的干预措施;EA+拔罐在改善残疾和生活质量方面效果更好;ES+RT可能是一种更有效的促进神经恢复的策略;EA+ES可能在减轻炎症反应方面更好。
Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture and Acupuncture-Combined Therapies in the Treatment of Sciatica Caused by Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Purpose: Sciatica is a common complication of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). This network meta-analysis compared the efficacy of acupuncture monotherapies, acupuncture versus conventional rehabilitation, and acupuncture monotherapy versus combination therapies for LDH-related sciatica.
Patients and methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, CQVIP, and CBM. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using RStudio and GEMTC. STATA generated network and funnel plots. Treatment rankings were assessed using the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA). Bias risk was evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0.
Results: According to SUCRA, in terms of total effective rate, the more effective intervention was electroacupuncture combined with cupping therapy (EA+Cupping, 92.93%); in terms of VAS, the better intervention was needle knife combined with rehabilitation therapy (NK+RT, 95.96%); in terms of ODI, the more effective intervention was electroacupuncture combined with cupping therapy (EA+Cupping, 98.03%); in terms of JOA, the best intervention was electrostimulation combined with rehabilitation therapy (ES+RT, 88.27%); in terms of IL-6 and TNF-α, the better intervention was electroacupuncture combined with electrostimulation (EA+ES, 99.99%).
Conclusion: Acupuncture combined with other therapies demonstrates superior efficacy compared to rehabilitation treatment. Specifically, NK+RT is possibly a more effective intervention for pain relief; EA+Cupping shows a better benefit in improving disability and quality of life; ES+RT is likely a more effective strategy for promoting neurological recovery; and EA+ES is possibly better in reducing inflammatory responses.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.