Javier Sanchez-Sanchez, Alejandro Rodríguez-Fernández
{"title":"跳高运动员激活后表现增强幅度和时间过程的力量依赖性差异。","authors":"Javier Sanchez-Sanchez, Alejandro Rodríguez-Fernández","doi":"10.3390/jfmk10030333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: A post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) can acutely improve explosive actions, but its time course may be influenced by individual strength levels. <b>Objectives</b>: The aim of this study was to analyze the performance responses following three PAPE protocols, considering the strength level as a modulating factor in trained high jump athletes. <b>Methods</b>: Twenty-one male high jumpers (Tier 3) were divided into stronger (SG, n = 10) and weaker (WG, n = 11) groups based on the median load (80 kg) lifted at 0.8 m/s in a velocity-based half-squat test. The participants completed three squat-based PAPE protocols (velocity loss thresholds of 5%, 10%, and 15%) in a randomized, double-blind crossover design. Their performance in a 10 m sprint (S10) and a countermovement jump (CMJ) was assessed at baseline and 0, 4, 8, and 12 min post-intervention. <b>Results</b>: No significant three-way interactions were observed for the S10 or CMJ performance (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The absolute CMJ performance was consistently higher in the SG across all the time points (<i>p</i> < 0.001, d = 1.25, large), with significant peak values observed at 4 min post-activation. However, both groups exhibited transient improvements in their S10 and CMJ performance that were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and of a large magnitude (d = 1.93-3.15), observed at 4 and/or 8 min post-activation, which subsequently declined by 12 min. <b>Conclusions</b>: The strength level modulates both the time course and the magnitude of the PAPE. Stronger athletes responded better to both less and more demanding protocols (5% to 15% velocity loss thresholds) with a 4-8 min recovery, whereas weaker athletes benefited mainly from less demanding stimuli (5% velocity loss thresholds), provided that the recovery was sufficient (≈4 min) to allow potentiation to emerge. However, with more demanding protocols (15% velocity loss thresholds), a longer recovery period (≈8 min) appears necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strength-Dependent Differences in the Magnitude and Time Course of Post-Activation Performance Enhancement in High Jump Athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Javier Sanchez-Sanchez, Alejandro Rodríguez-Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jfmk10030333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: A post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) can acutely improve explosive actions, but its time course may be influenced by individual strength levels. <b>Objectives</b>: The aim of this study was to analyze the performance responses following three PAPE protocols, considering the strength level as a modulating factor in trained high jump athletes. <b>Methods</b>: Twenty-one male high jumpers (Tier 3) were divided into stronger (SG, n = 10) and weaker (WG, n = 11) groups based on the median load (80 kg) lifted at 0.8 m/s in a velocity-based half-squat test. The participants completed three squat-based PAPE protocols (velocity loss thresholds of 5%, 10%, and 15%) in a randomized, double-blind crossover design. Their performance in a 10 m sprint (S10) and a countermovement jump (CMJ) was assessed at baseline and 0, 4, 8, and 12 min post-intervention. <b>Results</b>: No significant three-way interactions were observed for the S10 or CMJ performance (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The absolute CMJ performance was consistently higher in the SG across all the time points (<i>p</i> < 0.001, d = 1.25, large), with significant peak values observed at 4 min post-activation. However, both groups exhibited transient improvements in their S10 and CMJ performance that were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and of a large magnitude (d = 1.93-3.15), observed at 4 and/or 8 min post-activation, which subsequently declined by 12 min. <b>Conclusions</b>: The strength level modulates both the time course and the magnitude of the PAPE. Stronger athletes responded better to both less and more demanding protocols (5% to 15% velocity loss thresholds) with a 4-8 min recovery, whereas weaker athletes benefited mainly from less demanding stimuli (5% velocity loss thresholds), provided that the recovery was sufficient (≈4 min) to allow potentiation to emerge. However, with more demanding protocols (15% velocity loss thresholds), a longer recovery period (≈8 min) appears necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452759/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10030333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10030333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:激活后性能增强(PAPE)可以显著改善爆发力,但其时间过程可能受到个体力量水平的影响。目的:本研究的目的是在考虑力量水平作为一个调节因素的情况下,分析训练有素的跳高运动员在三种PAPE方案下的表现反应。方法:采用基于速度的半深蹲试验,将21名3级男子跳高运动员按0.8 m/s的中位负重(80 kg)分为强(SG, n = 10)组和弱(WG, n = 11)组。参与者在随机、双盲交叉设计中完成了三个基于蹲的PAPE方案(速度损失阈值为5%、10%和15%)。在基线和干预后0、4、8和12分钟评估他们在10米冲刺(S10)和反向跳跃(CMJ)中的表现。结果:未观察到S10或CMJ性能的显著三方相互作用(p > 0.05)。在所有时间点上,SG的CMJ绝对性能始终较高(p < 0.001, d = 1.25,大),在激活后4分钟观察到显著的峰值。然而,两组在激活后4和/或8分钟观察到的S10和CMJ性能的短暂改善具有统计学意义(p < 0.05),并且幅度很大(d = 1.93-3.15),随后下降了12分钟。结论:强度水平调节PAPE的时间进程和大小。强壮的运动员在4-8分钟的恢复时间内对低要求和高要求的方案(5%至15%的速度损失阈值)都有更好的反应,而较弱的运动员主要受益于低要求的刺激(5%的速度损失阈值),前提是恢复足够(≈4分钟)以允许增强出现。然而,对于更苛刻的协议(15%的速度损失阈值),更长的恢复时间(≈8分钟)似乎是必要的。
Strength-Dependent Differences in the Magnitude and Time Course of Post-Activation Performance Enhancement in High Jump Athletes.
Background: A post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) can acutely improve explosive actions, but its time course may be influenced by individual strength levels. Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the performance responses following three PAPE protocols, considering the strength level as a modulating factor in trained high jump athletes. Methods: Twenty-one male high jumpers (Tier 3) were divided into stronger (SG, n = 10) and weaker (WG, n = 11) groups based on the median load (80 kg) lifted at 0.8 m/s in a velocity-based half-squat test. The participants completed three squat-based PAPE protocols (velocity loss thresholds of 5%, 10%, and 15%) in a randomized, double-blind crossover design. Their performance in a 10 m sprint (S10) and a countermovement jump (CMJ) was assessed at baseline and 0, 4, 8, and 12 min post-intervention. Results: No significant three-way interactions were observed for the S10 or CMJ performance (p > 0.05). The absolute CMJ performance was consistently higher in the SG across all the time points (p < 0.001, d = 1.25, large), with significant peak values observed at 4 min post-activation. However, both groups exhibited transient improvements in their S10 and CMJ performance that were statistically significant (p < 0.05) and of a large magnitude (d = 1.93-3.15), observed at 4 and/or 8 min post-activation, which subsequently declined by 12 min. Conclusions: The strength level modulates both the time course and the magnitude of the PAPE. Stronger athletes responded better to both less and more demanding protocols (5% to 15% velocity loss thresholds) with a 4-8 min recovery, whereas weaker athletes benefited mainly from less demanding stimuli (5% velocity loss thresholds), provided that the recovery was sufficient (≈4 min) to allow potentiation to emerge. However, with more demanding protocols (15% velocity loss thresholds), a longer recovery period (≈8 min) appears necessary.