髋部骨折疼痛的囊周神经群阻滞治疗:紧急应用的叙述性回顾。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-09-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S528497
Ya-Bei Li, Man Zuo, Jing-Ping Zhu, Ri-Liang Ma, Xiao-Zu Liao
{"title":"髋部骨折疼痛的囊周神经群阻滞治疗:紧急应用的叙述性回顾。","authors":"Ya-Bei Li, Man Zuo, Jing-Ping Zhu, Ri-Liang Ma, Xiao-Zu Liao","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S528497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a regional anaesthesia technique for acute pain management that is becoming frequently employed for emergency lower limb fractures, particularly hip injuries. While current evidence has been predominantly derived from postoperative randomized trials and case series, the results of recent clinical reports support the preprocedural utility of the PENG block in emergency settings for rapid analgesia 40-60% pain score reduction and preservation of motor function. This review synthesizes mechanistic insights and clinical outcomes from the literature, comparing the targeted sensory blockade of the hip capsule with the PENG block with that of systemic opioids (which risks inducing respiratory depression) and fascia iliaca block (which can induce motor impairment). Key advantages of PENG blockade include significant opioid-sparing effects (50-70% reduction morphine use) and almost no motor complications. Standardized ultrasound-guided protocols can address challenges related to anatomical variability. Preliminary evidence from case reports suggests that the efficacy of the PENG block to pelvic and femoral shaft fractures, although multicentre trials are needed to establish optimal doses and long-term functional outcomes. This evidence indicates that PENG blockade could serve as a promising emergency intervention, but further protocol refinement is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"4801-4807"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12447963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Hip Fracture Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Emergency Applications.\",\"authors\":\"Ya-Bei Li, Man Zuo, Jing-Ping Zhu, Ri-Liang Ma, Xiao-Zu Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S528497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a regional anaesthesia technique for acute pain management that is becoming frequently employed for emergency lower limb fractures, particularly hip injuries. While current evidence has been predominantly derived from postoperative randomized trials and case series, the results of recent clinical reports support the preprocedural utility of the PENG block in emergency settings for rapid analgesia 40-60% pain score reduction and preservation of motor function. This review synthesizes mechanistic insights and clinical outcomes from the literature, comparing the targeted sensory blockade of the hip capsule with the PENG block with that of systemic opioids (which risks inducing respiratory depression) and fascia iliaca block (which can induce motor impairment). Key advantages of PENG blockade include significant opioid-sparing effects (50-70% reduction morphine use) and almost no motor complications. Standardized ultrasound-guided protocols can address challenges related to anatomical variability. Preliminary evidence from case reports suggests that the efficacy of the PENG block to pelvic and femoral shaft fractures, although multicentre trials are needed to establish optimal doses and long-term functional outcomes. This evidence indicates that PENG blockade could serve as a promising emergency intervention, but further protocol refinement is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"4801-4807\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12447963/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S528497\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S528497","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

囊周神经群阻滞(PENG)是一种用于急性疼痛管理的区域麻醉技术,已成为急诊下肢骨折,特别是髋部损伤的常用麻醉方法。虽然目前的证据主要来自术后随机试验和病例系列,但最近的临床报告结果支持手术前在紧急情况下使用PENG阻滞快速镇痛40-60%的疼痛评分降低和保持运动功能。本综述综合了文献中的机制见解和临床结果,比较了髋关节囊的靶向感觉阻滞、PENG阻滞与全身性阿片类药物(有引起呼吸抑制的风险)和髂筋膜阻滞(可引起运动障碍)。彭阻断的主要优点包括显著的阿片类药物节约作用(吗啡使用减少50-70%)和几乎没有运动并发症。标准化的超声引导方案可以解决与解剖变异性相关的挑战。来自病例报告的初步证据表明,彭阻滞对骨盆和股骨干骨折有效,尽管需要多中心试验来确定最佳剂量和长期功能结果。这一证据表明,PENG阻断可以作为一种有希望的紧急干预措施,但需要进一步改进方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Hip Fracture Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Emergency Applications.

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Hip Fracture Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Emergency Applications.

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Hip Fracture Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Emergency Applications.

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Hip Fracture Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Emergency Applications.

The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a regional anaesthesia technique for acute pain management that is becoming frequently employed for emergency lower limb fractures, particularly hip injuries. While current evidence has been predominantly derived from postoperative randomized trials and case series, the results of recent clinical reports support the preprocedural utility of the PENG block in emergency settings for rapid analgesia 40-60% pain score reduction and preservation of motor function. This review synthesizes mechanistic insights and clinical outcomes from the literature, comparing the targeted sensory blockade of the hip capsule with the PENG block with that of systemic opioids (which risks inducing respiratory depression) and fascia iliaca block (which can induce motor impairment). Key advantages of PENG blockade include significant opioid-sparing effects (50-70% reduction morphine use) and almost no motor complications. Standardized ultrasound-guided protocols can address challenges related to anatomical variability. Preliminary evidence from case reports suggests that the efficacy of the PENG block to pelvic and femoral shaft fractures, although multicentre trials are needed to establish optimal doses and long-term functional outcomes. This evidence indicates that PENG blockade could serve as a promising emergency intervention, but further protocol refinement is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信