在实用的临床试验中,社区参与策略改善了招募和入组。

IF 2 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-07-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2025.10103
Kari G Vance, Jonah Pedelty, Barbara J Van Gorp, Carol G T Vance, Elizabeth M Johnson, Fangfang Jiang, David-Erick Lafontant, Maxine Koepp, Andrew A Post, Emine Bayman, Ruth L Chimenti, Dana L Dailey, Leslie J Crofford, Heather Reisinger, Kathleen A Sluka
{"title":"在实用的临床试验中,社区参与策略改善了招募和入组。","authors":"Kari G Vance, Jonah Pedelty, Barbara J Van Gorp, Carol G T Vance, Elizabeth M Johnson, Fangfang Jiang, David-Erick Lafontant, Maxine Koepp, Andrew A Post, Emine Bayman, Ruth L Chimenti, Dana L Dailey, Leslie J Crofford, Heather Reisinger, Kathleen A Sluka","doi":"10.1017/cts.2025.10103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rural communities make up 19% of the US population, yet are underrepresented in clinical trials. Community engagement methods can facilitate collaboration and trust with local healthcare personnel to enhance enrollment. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe community engagement methods and their impact on enrollment in a pragmatic clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe a variety of methods used in the Fibromyalgia TENS in Physical Therapy Study (FM-TIPS) to enhance enrollment in rural communities and low-enrolling clinics. Community engagement methods were implemented partway through the trial for selected groups: Targeted Rural (TR) (<i>n</i> = 10), Targeted Low Enrolling (TLE) (<i>n</i> = 6), and compared to Untargeted Groups (UT) (<i>n</i> = 13). The impact of these methods on inquiries, screening, and enrollment were evaluated by comparing actual enrollment to projected enrollment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We trained and employed community engagement coordinators to implement strategies in TR and TLE physical therapy clinics. These included, posting flyers, community events, physician outreach, social media ads, and direct mailing. These methods increased study inquiries, screening and enrollment in the study. Specifically, when compared to projected values there were increases in enrollment for both the TR and the TLE groups, but not the UT group. Of those that passed screening 99% of rural and 32% of urban residents enrolled in the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A multi-pronged and individualized community engagement approach can increase enrollment of rural residents in clinical trials. Building strong relationships and partnering with community clinics and local communities is essential to success.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community engagement strategies improve recruitment and enrollment in a pragmatic clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kari G Vance, Jonah Pedelty, Barbara J Van Gorp, Carol G T Vance, Elizabeth M Johnson, Fangfang Jiang, David-Erick Lafontant, Maxine Koepp, Andrew A Post, Emine Bayman, Ruth L Chimenti, Dana L Dailey, Leslie J Crofford, Heather Reisinger, Kathleen A Sluka\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cts.2025.10103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rural communities make up 19% of the US population, yet are underrepresented in clinical trials. Community engagement methods can facilitate collaboration and trust with local healthcare personnel to enhance enrollment. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe community engagement methods and their impact on enrollment in a pragmatic clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe a variety of methods used in the Fibromyalgia TENS in Physical Therapy Study (FM-TIPS) to enhance enrollment in rural communities and low-enrolling clinics. Community engagement methods were implemented partway through the trial for selected groups: Targeted Rural (TR) (<i>n</i> = 10), Targeted Low Enrolling (TLE) (<i>n</i> = 6), and compared to Untargeted Groups (UT) (<i>n</i> = 13). The impact of these methods on inquiries, screening, and enrollment were evaluated by comparing actual enrollment to projected enrollment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We trained and employed community engagement coordinators to implement strategies in TR and TLE physical therapy clinics. These included, posting flyers, community events, physician outreach, social media ads, and direct mailing. These methods increased study inquiries, screening and enrollment in the study. Specifically, when compared to projected values there were increases in enrollment for both the TR and the TLE groups, but not the UT group. Of those that passed screening 99% of rural and 32% of urban residents enrolled in the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A multi-pronged and individualized community engagement approach can increase enrollment of rural residents in clinical trials. Building strong relationships and partnering with community clinics and local communities is essential to success.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"e184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444702/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农村社区占美国人口的19%,但在临床试验中代表性不足。社区参与方法可以促进与当地医疗保健人员的合作和信任,以提高入学率。本文的目的是描述社区参与方法及其对实用临床试验入组的影响。方法:我们描述了纤维肌痛TENS在物理治疗研究(FM-TIPS)中使用的各种方法,以提高农村社区和低入组诊所的入组率。在试验的中途,对选定的群体实施了社区参与方法:目标农村(TR) (n = 10),目标低入学率(TLE) (n = 6),并与非目标群体(UT) (n = 13)进行了比较。通过比较实际入组人数和预计入组人数来评估这些方法对查询、筛选和入组的影响。结果:我们培训并雇用社区参与协调员在TR和TLE物理治疗诊所实施策略。这些措施包括张贴传单、社区活动、医生外展、社交媒体广告和直接邮寄。这些方法增加了研究的问询、筛选和入组。具体来说,与预测值相比,TR组和TLE组的入组人数都有所增加,但UT组没有。在那些通过筛选的人中,99%的农村居民和32%的城市居民参加了这项研究。结论:多管齐下、个性化的社区参与方式可以提高农村居民临床试验的入组率。与社区诊所和当地社区建立牢固的关系和伙伴关系是取得成功的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Community engagement strategies improve recruitment and enrollment in a pragmatic clinical trial.

Community engagement strategies improve recruitment and enrollment in a pragmatic clinical trial.

Community engagement strategies improve recruitment and enrollment in a pragmatic clinical trial.

Community engagement strategies improve recruitment and enrollment in a pragmatic clinical trial.

Introduction: Rural communities make up 19% of the US population, yet are underrepresented in clinical trials. Community engagement methods can facilitate collaboration and trust with local healthcare personnel to enhance enrollment. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe community engagement methods and their impact on enrollment in a pragmatic clinical trial.

Methods: We describe a variety of methods used in the Fibromyalgia TENS in Physical Therapy Study (FM-TIPS) to enhance enrollment in rural communities and low-enrolling clinics. Community engagement methods were implemented partway through the trial for selected groups: Targeted Rural (TR) (n = 10), Targeted Low Enrolling (TLE) (n = 6), and compared to Untargeted Groups (UT) (n = 13). The impact of these methods on inquiries, screening, and enrollment were evaluated by comparing actual enrollment to projected enrollment.

Results: We trained and employed community engagement coordinators to implement strategies in TR and TLE physical therapy clinics. These included, posting flyers, community events, physician outreach, social media ads, and direct mailing. These methods increased study inquiries, screening and enrollment in the study. Specifically, when compared to projected values there were increases in enrollment for both the TR and the TLE groups, but not the UT group. Of those that passed screening 99% of rural and 32% of urban residents enrolled in the study.

Conclusion: A multi-pronged and individualized community engagement approach can increase enrollment of rural residents in clinical trials. Building strong relationships and partnering with community clinics and local communities is essential to success.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信