{"title":"台湾居家医院:减少住院时间与医疗支出。","authors":"Tian-Hoe Tan, Yu-Chieh Ho, Hung-Lin Hsu, Ting-Chia Chang, Kang-Ting Tsai, Hung-Jen Tang, Chien-Chin Hsu, Hung-Jung Lin, Hsiu-Chin Chen, Chien-Cheng Huang","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S547734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-at-Home (HaH) is an alternative care model that delivers hospital-level treatment at home, improving patient outcomes while reducing healthcare costs. Despite its success globally, HaH was not implemented in Taiwan until the initiation of a pilot program. This study evaluates the outcomes of HaH compared to traditional hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan. HaH patients diagnosed with pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or soft tissue infection between August 1, 2024, and January 31, 2025, were included (n = 69). A matched hospitalized cohort (n = 246) was selected based on age, sex, and diagnosis. Outcomes, including length of stay, medical expenditure, emergency department (ED) visits, rehospitalization, and patient satisfaction, were analyzed using univariate and logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HaH cohort had a significantly shorter length of stay (adjusted OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.30-0.93, p = 0.028) and lower medical expenditure (adjusted OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.33, p < 0.001). HaH patients were more likely to transition to home healthcare (73.9% vs 7.3%, p < 0.001), and satisfaction was 100%. No significant differences were found in ED visits or rehospitalization rates between the two cohorts (all p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HaH is an effective alternative to hospitalization, reducing length of stay and medical expenses while maintaining patient safety and satisfaction. Expanding HaH to additional conditions could further enhance healthcare efficiency. These findings highlight HaH's feasibility in Taiwan and its role in healthcare resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"5893-5903"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital-at-Home in Taiwan: Reducing Hospital Stay and Medical Expenditures.\",\"authors\":\"Tian-Hoe Tan, Yu-Chieh Ho, Hung-Lin Hsu, Ting-Chia Chang, Kang-Ting Tsai, Hung-Jen Tang, Chien-Chin Hsu, Hung-Jung Lin, Hsiu-Chin Chen, Chien-Cheng Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JMDH.S547734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-at-Home (HaH) is an alternative care model that delivers hospital-level treatment at home, improving patient outcomes while reducing healthcare costs. Despite its success globally, HaH was not implemented in Taiwan until the initiation of a pilot program. This study evaluates the outcomes of HaH compared to traditional hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan. HaH patients diagnosed with pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or soft tissue infection between August 1, 2024, and January 31, 2025, were included (n = 69). A matched hospitalized cohort (n = 246) was selected based on age, sex, and diagnosis. Outcomes, including length of stay, medical expenditure, emergency department (ED) visits, rehospitalization, and patient satisfaction, were analyzed using univariate and logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HaH cohort had a significantly shorter length of stay (adjusted OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.30-0.93, p = 0.028) and lower medical expenditure (adjusted OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.33, p < 0.001). HaH patients were more likely to transition to home healthcare (73.9% vs 7.3%, p < 0.001), and satisfaction was 100%. No significant differences were found in ED visits or rehospitalization rates between the two cohorts (all p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HaH is an effective alternative to hospitalization, reducing length of stay and medical expenses while maintaining patient safety and satisfaction. Expanding HaH to additional conditions could further enhance healthcare efficiency. These findings highlight HaH's feasibility in Taiwan and its role in healthcare resilience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"5893-5903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449870/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S547734\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S547734","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:家庭医院(hospital- home, HaH)是一种替代性的医疗模式,可在家中提供医院级别的治疗,改善患者的治疗效果,同时降低医疗成本。尽管在全球范围内取得了成功,但直到试点项目启动后,HaH才在台湾实施。本研究比较了HaH与传统住院治疗的结果。方法:在台湾某三级医疗中心进行回顾性队列研究。纳入2024年8月1日至2025年1月31日期间诊断为肺炎、尿路感染或软组织感染的HaH患者(n = 69)。根据年龄、性别和诊断选择匹配的住院队列(n = 246)。结果包括住院时间、医疗费用、急诊科(ED)就诊、再住院和患者满意度,采用单变量和logistic回归分析进行分析。结果:HaH队列的住院时间明显缩短(调整OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.30-0.93, p = 0.028),医疗费用明显降低(调整OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.33, p < 0.001)。HaH患者更有可能转向家庭保健(73.9% vs 7.3%, p < 0.001),满意度为100%。两组患者的急诊科就诊率和再住院率均无显著差异(p < 0.05)。结论:体外循环治疗是一种有效的替代住院治疗的方法,在保证患者安全和满意度的同时减少了住院时间和医疗费用。将HaH扩大到其他条件可以进一步提高医疗保健效率。这些发现突出了HaH在台湾的可行性及其在医疗弹性中的作用。
Hospital-at-Home in Taiwan: Reducing Hospital Stay and Medical Expenditures.
Background: Hospital-at-Home (HaH) is an alternative care model that delivers hospital-level treatment at home, improving patient outcomes while reducing healthcare costs. Despite its success globally, HaH was not implemented in Taiwan until the initiation of a pilot program. This study evaluates the outcomes of HaH compared to traditional hospitalization.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan. HaH patients diagnosed with pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or soft tissue infection between August 1, 2024, and January 31, 2025, were included (n = 69). A matched hospitalized cohort (n = 246) was selected based on age, sex, and diagnosis. Outcomes, including length of stay, medical expenditure, emergency department (ED) visits, rehospitalization, and patient satisfaction, were analyzed using univariate and logistic regression analyses.
Results: The HaH cohort had a significantly shorter length of stay (adjusted OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.30-0.93, p = 0.028) and lower medical expenditure (adjusted OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.33, p < 0.001). HaH patients were more likely to transition to home healthcare (73.9% vs 7.3%, p < 0.001), and satisfaction was 100%. No significant differences were found in ED visits or rehospitalization rates between the two cohorts (all p > 0.05).
Conclusion: HaH is an effective alternative to hospitalization, reducing length of stay and medical expenses while maintaining patient safety and satisfaction. Expanding HaH to additional conditions could further enhance healthcare efficiency. These findings highlight HaH's feasibility in Taiwan and its role in healthcare resilience.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.