认知行为疗法对改善青少年2型糖尿病患者心理健康结果的影响:一项系统评价方案

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2025-08-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1287_24
Samson Femi Agberotimi, Moyosoluwa Priscilla Dele-Dada, Peace Toluwani Akhibi, Abayomi Oladele Olaseni
{"title":"认知行为疗法对改善青少年2型糖尿病患者心理健康结果的影响:一项系统评价方案","authors":"Samson Femi Agberotimi, Moyosoluwa Priscilla Dele-Dada, Peace Toluwani Akhibi, Abayomi Oladele Olaseni","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1287_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depression and anxiety are among the most common mental health outcomes experienced by young individuals with type 2 diabetes. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been proven to be an effective intervention for depression and anxiety. This review shall summarize the evidence for the effectiveness of CBT for depression and/or anxiety among adolescents with type 2 diabetes. This systematic review aims to summarize evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy compared to treatment as usual or no treatment on improving depression and anxiety in adolescents with type 2 diabetes. To be included in the review, a study design must be used to test the effectiveness of CBT on depression and/or anxiety in adolescents with type 2 diabetes. Also, studies must be published in peer-reviewed journals in the English language between 2014 and 2023. Studies examining the effectiveness of CBT for conditions other than depression and/or anxiety shall be excluded. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol and guideline checklist (2020) shall be used to select studies for this systematic review. A comprehensive search shall be conducted on electronic databases such as APAPsycINFO, APA PsycARTICLES, CINAHL, and MEDLINE to identify studies that fit the selection criteria. Data to be extracted for analysis shall include the study aim, sample, research design, intervention modality, comparators, and outcomes. Two independent authors shall perform data extraction. An acceptable checklist for randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies will be used to assess the quality of the studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"14 ","pages":"340"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on improving mental health outcomes in adolescents with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Samson Femi Agberotimi, Moyosoluwa Priscilla Dele-Dada, Peace Toluwani Akhibi, Abayomi Oladele Olaseni\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1287_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Depression and anxiety are among the most common mental health outcomes experienced by young individuals with type 2 diabetes. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been proven to be an effective intervention for depression and anxiety. This review shall summarize the evidence for the effectiveness of CBT for depression and/or anxiety among adolescents with type 2 diabetes. This systematic review aims to summarize evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy compared to treatment as usual or no treatment on improving depression and anxiety in adolescents with type 2 diabetes. To be included in the review, a study design must be used to test the effectiveness of CBT on depression and/or anxiety in adolescents with type 2 diabetes. Also, studies must be published in peer-reviewed journals in the English language between 2014 and 2023. Studies examining the effectiveness of CBT for conditions other than depression and/or anxiety shall be excluded. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol and guideline checklist (2020) shall be used to select studies for this systematic review. A comprehensive search shall be conducted on electronic databases such as APAPsycINFO, APA PsycARTICLES, CINAHL, and MEDLINE to identify studies that fit the selection criteria. Data to be extracted for analysis shall include the study aim, sample, research design, intervention modality, comparators, and outcomes. Two independent authors shall perform data extraction. An acceptable checklist for randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies will be used to assess the quality of the studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448516/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1287_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1287_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抑郁和焦虑是年轻2型糖尿病患者最常见的心理健康结果。认知行为疗法(CBT)已被证明是一种有效的干预抑郁和焦虑。本综述总结了CBT治疗青少年2型糖尿病患者抑郁和/或焦虑的有效性证据。本系统综述旨在总结认知行为疗法与常规治疗或不治疗相比在改善青少年2型糖尿病患者抑郁和焦虑方面的有效性的证据。要纳入本综述,必须使用一项研究设计来测试CBT对青少年2型糖尿病患者抑郁和/或焦虑的有效性。此外,研究必须在2014年至2023年间以英文发表在同行评议的期刊上。除抑郁和/或焦虑外,检验CBT治疗效果的研究应排除在外。系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)方案和指南清单(2020)应使用为本系统评价选择研究。在APAPsycINFO、APA PsycARTICLES、CINAHL和MEDLINE等电子数据库中进行全面检索,以确定符合选择标准的研究。提取用于分析的数据应包括研究目的、样本、研究设计、干预方式、比较物和结果。由两名独立作者进行数据提取。随机对照试验和准实验研究的可接受检查表将用于评估研究的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on improving mental health outcomes in adolescents with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review protocol.

Depression and anxiety are among the most common mental health outcomes experienced by young individuals with type 2 diabetes. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been proven to be an effective intervention for depression and anxiety. This review shall summarize the evidence for the effectiveness of CBT for depression and/or anxiety among adolescents with type 2 diabetes. This systematic review aims to summarize evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy compared to treatment as usual or no treatment on improving depression and anxiety in adolescents with type 2 diabetes. To be included in the review, a study design must be used to test the effectiveness of CBT on depression and/or anxiety in adolescents with type 2 diabetes. Also, studies must be published in peer-reviewed journals in the English language between 2014 and 2023. Studies examining the effectiveness of CBT for conditions other than depression and/or anxiety shall be excluded. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol and guideline checklist (2020) shall be used to select studies for this systematic review. A comprehensive search shall be conducted on electronic databases such as APAPsycINFO, APA PsycARTICLES, CINAHL, and MEDLINE to identify studies that fit the selection criteria. Data to be extracted for analysis shall include the study aim, sample, research design, intervention modality, comparators, and outcomes. Two independent authors shall perform data extraction. An acceptable checklist for randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies will be used to assess the quality of the studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信