从实验室到床边的迷宫:CTSA中心在精简学术医疗中心研究支持方面的经验教训。

IF 2 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-08-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2025.10118
Leah Pope, Bernard Chang, Michelle McClave, Sheila Marie O'Byrne, Kawthar Muhammad, Zainab Abedin, Mary Purcell, Anjana Nair, Kayla Zalcgendler, Muredach P Reilly
{"title":"从实验室到床边的迷宫:CTSA中心在精简学术医疗中心研究支持方面的经验教训。","authors":"Leah Pope, Bernard Chang, Michelle McClave, Sheila Marie O'Byrne, Kawthar Muhammad, Zainab Abedin, Mary Purcell, Anjana Nair, Kayla Zalcgendler, Muredach P Reilly","doi":"10.1017/cts.2025.10118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) with Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs) offer a range of resources to support clinical and translational research and science. However, research professionals often face challenges in navigating these resources effectively.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our study sought to examine research navigation services across CTSA hubs to identify successful strategies, common challenges, and best practices for supporting research teams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted interviews with representatives from ten CTSA hubs and performed a landscape analysis to explore the types of research navigation services available, the methods of advertising and orienting faculty and staff, and the challenges faced in launching and maintaining these services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis identified three primary types of research navigation services offered at CTSA hubs: online resource libraries, personalized research navigation with dedicated staff, and interdisciplinary research \"studios\" for protocol development. Despite these offerings, challenges such as low awareness, difficulties coordinating across siloed university systems, and limited metrics for evaluating navigation services persist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Effective research navigation requires a combination of web-based applications and in-person support, backed by institutional commitment to foster engagement and streamline access. Key strategies for successful navigation services include proactive advertising, integration with orientation programs, and cross-departmental collaboration. Our findings offer actionable recommendations for enhancing research navigation at AMCs, ultimately aiming to increase research productivity and collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating the bench to bedside maze: Lessons from CTSA hubs on streamlining research support in academic medical centers.\",\"authors\":\"Leah Pope, Bernard Chang, Michelle McClave, Sheila Marie O'Byrne, Kawthar Muhammad, Zainab Abedin, Mary Purcell, Anjana Nair, Kayla Zalcgendler, Muredach P Reilly\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cts.2025.10118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) with Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs) offer a range of resources to support clinical and translational research and science. However, research professionals often face challenges in navigating these resources effectively.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our study sought to examine research navigation services across CTSA hubs to identify successful strategies, common challenges, and best practices for supporting research teams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted interviews with representatives from ten CTSA hubs and performed a landscape analysis to explore the types of research navigation services available, the methods of advertising and orienting faculty and staff, and the challenges faced in launching and maintaining these services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis identified three primary types of research navigation services offered at CTSA hubs: online resource libraries, personalized research navigation with dedicated staff, and interdisciplinary research \\\"studios\\\" for protocol development. Despite these offerings, challenges such as low awareness, difficulties coordinating across siloed university systems, and limited metrics for evaluating navigation services persist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Effective research navigation requires a combination of web-based applications and in-person support, backed by institutional commitment to foster engagement and streamline access. Key strategies for successful navigation services include proactive advertising, integration with orientation programs, and cross-departmental collaboration. Our findings offer actionable recommendations for enhancing research navigation at AMCs, ultimately aiming to increase research productivity and collaboration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"e188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444686/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:拥有临床和转化科学奖(CTSAs)的学术医学中心(amc)提供一系列资源来支持临床和转化研究和科学。然而,研究专业人员在有效地导航这些资源方面经常面临挑战。目的:我们的研究旨在检查CTSA中心的研究导航服务,以确定成功的策略、共同的挑战和支持研究团队的最佳实践。方法:我们对来自10个CTSA中心的代表进行了访谈,并进行了景观分析,以探索可用的研究导航服务类型,广告和指导教职员工的方法,以及在启动和维护这些服务时面临的挑战。结果:我们的分析确定了CTSA中心提供的研究导航服务的三种主要类型:在线资源库,有专门工作人员的个性化研究导航,以及用于协议开发的跨学科研究“工作室”。尽管提供了这些服务,但仍然存在一些挑战,如低认知度、难以在孤立的大学系统之间进行协调以及评估导航服务的指标有限等。结论:有效的研究导航需要将基于网络的应用程序和面对面的支持结合起来,并得到促进参与和简化访问的机构承诺的支持。成功导航服务的关键策略包括主动广告、与定向程序的集成以及跨部门协作。我们的发现为加强amc的研究导航提供了可行的建议,最终旨在提高研究生产力和合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Navigating the bench to bedside maze: Lessons from CTSA hubs on streamlining research support in academic medical centers.

Navigating the bench to bedside maze: Lessons from CTSA hubs on streamlining research support in academic medical centers.

Background: Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) with Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs) offer a range of resources to support clinical and translational research and science. However, research professionals often face challenges in navigating these resources effectively.

Objective: Our study sought to examine research navigation services across CTSA hubs to identify successful strategies, common challenges, and best practices for supporting research teams.

Methods: We conducted interviews with representatives from ten CTSA hubs and performed a landscape analysis to explore the types of research navigation services available, the methods of advertising and orienting faculty and staff, and the challenges faced in launching and maintaining these services.

Results: Our analysis identified three primary types of research navigation services offered at CTSA hubs: online resource libraries, personalized research navigation with dedicated staff, and interdisciplinary research "studios" for protocol development. Despite these offerings, challenges such as low awareness, difficulties coordinating across siloed university systems, and limited metrics for evaluating navigation services persist.

Conclusion: Effective research navigation requires a combination of web-based applications and in-person support, backed by institutional commitment to foster engagement and streamline access. Key strategies for successful navigation services include proactive advertising, integration with orientation programs, and cross-departmental collaboration. Our findings offer actionable recommendations for enhancing research navigation at AMCs, ultimately aiming to increase research productivity and collaboration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信