医学生免疫学课程内容、教学及评价方法综述。

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2025-08-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_111_24
Rasa Sepasi, Saeideh Ghaffarifar, Fariba Pashazadeh, Sima S Farid
{"title":"医学生免疫学课程内容、教学及评价方法综述。","authors":"Rasa Sepasi, Saeideh Ghaffarifar, Fariba Pashazadeh, Sima S Farid","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_111_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The traditional immunology course mainly involves lectures and activities outside of the lectures, which prevents any links between basic knowledge and clinical practice. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess and summarize teaching methods of immunology for medical students in top universities of the world. This study adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute manual for systematic reviews in conducting this study. The following databases were searched: PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, ProQuest, and the Cochrane Library. After selecting papers, appraising them, and extracting all findings from papers, these findings were categorized based on their concepts and similarities. We summarized and presented the findings in the narrative form. Of 34 articles and abstracts identified, 23 underwent full-text review, and nine were included in this systematic review. The studies involved a total of 2023 students and teachers and five immunology teaching methods. The teaching methods were patient-oriented problem-solving, case-based learning, e-learning packages, audio-visual modules, and clinical simulations. Based on our findings, all new methods of immunology teaching for medical students performed better than dialectic and board lectures. The use of active learning in immunology teaching of medical students will encourage them to learn more actively, which can ultimately increase their clinical performance at their school and in clinical environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"14 ","pages":"351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of content, teaching, and evaluation methods of immunology for medical students: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Rasa Sepasi, Saeideh Ghaffarifar, Fariba Pashazadeh, Sima S Farid\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jehp.jehp_111_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The traditional immunology course mainly involves lectures and activities outside of the lectures, which prevents any links between basic knowledge and clinical practice. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess and summarize teaching methods of immunology for medical students in top universities of the world. This study adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute manual for systematic reviews in conducting this study. The following databases were searched: PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, ProQuest, and the Cochrane Library. After selecting papers, appraising them, and extracting all findings from papers, these findings were categorized based on their concepts and similarities. We summarized and presented the findings in the narrative form. Of 34 articles and abstracts identified, 23 underwent full-text review, and nine were included in this systematic review. The studies involved a total of 2023 students and teachers and five immunology teaching methods. The teaching methods were patient-oriented problem-solving, case-based learning, e-learning packages, audio-visual modules, and clinical simulations. Based on our findings, all new methods of immunology teaching for medical students performed better than dialectic and board lectures. The use of active learning in immunology teaching of medical students will encourage them to learn more actively, which can ultimately increase their clinical performance at their school and in clinical environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448543/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_111_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_111_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的免疫学课程以授课和课外活动为主,缺乏基础知识与临床实践的联系。本系统综述旨在对世界一流大学医学生免疫学教学方法进行评估和总结。本研究遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所手册进行系统评价。检索了以下数据库:PubMed、ISI Web of Knowledge、Scopus、ProQuest和Cochrane Library。在选择论文,评价论文,并从论文中提取所有发现后,根据其概念和相似度对这些发现进行分类。我们以叙述的形式对研究结果进行总结和呈现。在34篇文章和摘要中,23篇进行了全文综述,9篇纳入本系统综述。研究共涉及2023名学生和教师,涉及五种免疫学教学方法。教学方法包括以患者为中心的问题解决、案例学习、电子学习包、视听模块和临床模拟。结果表明,新方法的免疫学教学效果优于辩证法和板课教学。在医科学生的免疫学教学中使用主动学习将鼓励他们更积极地学习,这最终可以提高他们在学校和临床环境中的临床表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Review of content, teaching, and evaluation methods of immunology for medical students: A systematic review.

Review of content, teaching, and evaluation methods of immunology for medical students: A systematic review.

The traditional immunology course mainly involves lectures and activities outside of the lectures, which prevents any links between basic knowledge and clinical practice. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess and summarize teaching methods of immunology for medical students in top universities of the world. This study adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute manual for systematic reviews in conducting this study. The following databases were searched: PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, ProQuest, and the Cochrane Library. After selecting papers, appraising them, and extracting all findings from papers, these findings were categorized based on their concepts and similarities. We summarized and presented the findings in the narrative form. Of 34 articles and abstracts identified, 23 underwent full-text review, and nine were included in this systematic review. The studies involved a total of 2023 students and teachers and five immunology teaching methods. The teaching methods were patient-oriented problem-solving, case-based learning, e-learning packages, audio-visual modules, and clinical simulations. Based on our findings, all new methods of immunology teaching for medical students performed better than dialectic and board lectures. The use of active learning in immunology teaching of medical students will encourage them to learn more actively, which can ultimately increase their clinical performance at their school and in clinical environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信