噬菌体治疗:临床医生的态度和经验的国际调查。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Riley D Alvarez, Emma Cl Finlayson-Trick, Ruby Cy Lin, Greg J German
{"title":"噬菌体治疗:临床医生的态度和经验的国际调查。","authors":"Riley D Alvarez, Emma Cl Finlayson-Trick, Ruby Cy Lin, Greg J German","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2025.107627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phage therapy is a promising tool to combat the global threat of antimicrobial resistance. Clinicians, as part of interdisciplinary teams, play an integral role in identifying patients for therapy, delivering phages, and monitoring treatment outcomes and safety. As such, in the context of rapidly evolving regulatory landscapes, clinician insight is crucial for advancement of phage therapy. In this study, we describe the first published international anonymized survey aimed at identifying attitudes and experiences of clinicians and healthcare professionals towards phage therapy. We distributed the survey to participants in the Global Clinical Phage Rounds, a network of >300 phage clinicians, health professionals, and scientists, from October 15, 2024 - January 30, 2025. Thirty respondents representing North America, Europe, Oceania, Africa, and Asia completed the survey (response rate 9.6%). The majority of respondents were very well-informed about phage therapy and 93% would consider enrolling their patients in phage therapy randomized controlled trials. Respondents identified Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella species, and Staphylococcus aureus as priority organisms and bone/joint, respiratory, and urinary tract infections as priority syndromes. Respondents had concerns about clinical use evidence, regulatory barriers, and accessing phage. Twenty respondents reported experience with phage therapy, so answered additional questions. These respondents acquired phages from sources like phage banks, industry, and importation from other countries. Respondents delivered phage therapy primarily in single-use cases via parenteral/intravenous, topical, or inhalation routes. Experienced respondents endorsed combinations of monitoring before, during, and/or after phage therapy. These results serve as a guiding initiative to improve phage therapy integration in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":" ","pages":"107627"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phage therapy: An international survey of attitudes and experiences amongst clinicians.\",\"authors\":\"Riley D Alvarez, Emma Cl Finlayson-Trick, Ruby Cy Lin, Greg J German\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2025.107627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Phage therapy is a promising tool to combat the global threat of antimicrobial resistance. Clinicians, as part of interdisciplinary teams, play an integral role in identifying patients for therapy, delivering phages, and monitoring treatment outcomes and safety. As such, in the context of rapidly evolving regulatory landscapes, clinician insight is crucial for advancement of phage therapy. In this study, we describe the first published international anonymized survey aimed at identifying attitudes and experiences of clinicians and healthcare professionals towards phage therapy. We distributed the survey to participants in the Global Clinical Phage Rounds, a network of >300 phage clinicians, health professionals, and scientists, from October 15, 2024 - January 30, 2025. Thirty respondents representing North America, Europe, Oceania, Africa, and Asia completed the survey (response rate 9.6%). The majority of respondents were very well-informed about phage therapy and 93% would consider enrolling their patients in phage therapy randomized controlled trials. Respondents identified Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella species, and Staphylococcus aureus as priority organisms and bone/joint, respiratory, and urinary tract infections as priority syndromes. Respondents had concerns about clinical use evidence, regulatory barriers, and accessing phage. Twenty respondents reported experience with phage therapy, so answered additional questions. These respondents acquired phages from sources like phage banks, industry, and importation from other countries. Respondents delivered phage therapy primarily in single-use cases via parenteral/intravenous, topical, or inhalation routes. Experienced respondents endorsed combinations of monitoring before, during, and/or after phage therapy. These results serve as a guiding initiative to improve phage therapy integration in healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107627\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2025.107627\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2025.107627","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

噬菌体治疗是对抗全球抗菌素耐药性威胁的一种有前途的工具。临床医生作为跨学科团队的一部分,在确定治疗患者、提供噬菌体以及监测治疗结果和安全性方面发挥着不可或缺的作用。因此,在快速发展的监管环境下,临床医生的洞察力对噬菌体治疗的进步至关重要。在这项研究中,我们描述了首次发表的国际匿名调查,旨在确定临床医生和医疗保健专业人员对噬菌体治疗的态度和经验。从2024年10月15日至2025年1月30日,我们将调查分发给了全球临床噬菌体轮次的参与者,这是一个由bb300名噬菌体临床医生、卫生专业人员和科学家组成的网络。来自北美、欧洲、大洋洲、非洲和亚洲的30位受访者完成了调查(回复率为9.6%)。大多数应答者对噬菌体治疗非常了解,93%的应答者会考虑让他们的患者参加噬菌体治疗随机对照试验。应答者认为铜绿假单胞菌、克雷伯氏菌和金黄色葡萄球菌是优先生物体,骨/关节、呼吸道和尿路感染是优先综合征。应答者对临床使用证据、监管障碍和获取噬菌体表示担忧。20名受访者报告了噬菌体治疗的经验,因此回答了额外的问题。这些应答者从噬菌体库、工业和其他国家进口等来源获得噬菌体。应答者主要通过肠外/静脉注射、局部或吸入途径在单次使用病例中提供噬菌体治疗。有经验的应答者赞同在噬菌体治疗之前、期间和/或之后进行联合监测。这些结果可作为指导倡议,以提高噬菌体治疗整合在医疗保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phage therapy: An international survey of attitudes and experiences amongst clinicians.

Phage therapy is a promising tool to combat the global threat of antimicrobial resistance. Clinicians, as part of interdisciplinary teams, play an integral role in identifying patients for therapy, delivering phages, and monitoring treatment outcomes and safety. As such, in the context of rapidly evolving regulatory landscapes, clinician insight is crucial for advancement of phage therapy. In this study, we describe the first published international anonymized survey aimed at identifying attitudes and experiences of clinicians and healthcare professionals towards phage therapy. We distributed the survey to participants in the Global Clinical Phage Rounds, a network of >300 phage clinicians, health professionals, and scientists, from October 15, 2024 - January 30, 2025. Thirty respondents representing North America, Europe, Oceania, Africa, and Asia completed the survey (response rate 9.6%). The majority of respondents were very well-informed about phage therapy and 93% would consider enrolling their patients in phage therapy randomized controlled trials. Respondents identified Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella species, and Staphylococcus aureus as priority organisms and bone/joint, respiratory, and urinary tract infections as priority syndromes. Respondents had concerns about clinical use evidence, regulatory barriers, and accessing phage. Twenty respondents reported experience with phage therapy, so answered additional questions. These respondents acquired phages from sources like phage banks, industry, and importation from other countries. Respondents delivered phage therapy primarily in single-use cases via parenteral/intravenous, topical, or inhalation routes. Experienced respondents endorsed combinations of monitoring before, during, and/or after phage therapy. These results serve as a guiding initiative to improve phage therapy integration in healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信