{"title":"60岁以下绝经后妇女骨质疏松症与肌肉减少症参数的关系:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Büşra Şirin Ahısha, Nur Kesiktaş","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-04090-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the prevalence of sarcopenia in postmenopausal women under the age of 60 and to evaluate the relationship between sarcopenia, bone mineral density (BMD), and clinical parameters.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 52 postmenopausal women under the age of 60, classified as osteoporotic or non-osteoporotic based on DXA results. Sarcopenia was assessed using the criteria of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2). Muscle strength was measured using handgrip strength and the five-time sit-to-stand test (5STS), and muscle mass was assessed with the Tanita BC-418MA device. Skeletal muscle mass indices (SMMI) were calculated based on height<sup>2</sup>, weight, and BMI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fat-free mass (FFM), skeletal muscle mass (SMM), and SMM/height<sup>2</sup> values were significantly lower in the osteoporotic group compared to the non-osteoporotic group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between the groups in handgrip strength or 5STS results. Sarcopenia prevalence varied depending on the muscle index used: 17.3% based on SMM/BMI (23.1% in the osteoporotic group, 11.5% in the non-osteoporotic group), 11.5% based on SMM/weight (3.8% vs. 19.2%), and 3.8% based on SMM/height<sup>2</sup> (equal in both groups). These differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Femoral neck and lumbar BMD and T-scores showed positive correlations with FFM and SMM, but not with muscle strength tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, sarcopenia prevalence did not significantly differ between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic postmenopausal women under 60. However, the lower muscle mass observed in the osteoporotic group may indicate early structural changes associated with sarcopenia. The lack of difference in functional capacity suggests that these changes may not yet be clinically apparent.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between osteoporosis and sarcopenia parameters in postmenopausal women under 60 years of age: A cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Büşra Şirin Ahısha, Nur Kesiktaş\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11845-025-04090-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the prevalence of sarcopenia in postmenopausal women under the age of 60 and to evaluate the relationship between sarcopenia, bone mineral density (BMD), and clinical parameters.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 52 postmenopausal women under the age of 60, classified as osteoporotic or non-osteoporotic based on DXA results. Sarcopenia was assessed using the criteria of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2). Muscle strength was measured using handgrip strength and the five-time sit-to-stand test (5STS), and muscle mass was assessed with the Tanita BC-418MA device. Skeletal muscle mass indices (SMMI) were calculated based on height<sup>2</sup>, weight, and BMI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fat-free mass (FFM), skeletal muscle mass (SMM), and SMM/height<sup>2</sup> values were significantly lower in the osteoporotic group compared to the non-osteoporotic group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between the groups in handgrip strength or 5STS results. Sarcopenia prevalence varied depending on the muscle index used: 17.3% based on SMM/BMI (23.1% in the osteoporotic group, 11.5% in the non-osteoporotic group), 11.5% based on SMM/weight (3.8% vs. 19.2%), and 3.8% based on SMM/height<sup>2</sup> (equal in both groups). These differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Femoral neck and lumbar BMD and T-scores showed positive correlations with FFM and SMM, but not with muscle strength tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, sarcopenia prevalence did not significantly differ between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic postmenopausal women under 60. However, the lower muscle mass observed in the osteoporotic group may indicate early structural changes associated with sarcopenia. The lack of difference in functional capacity suggests that these changes may not yet be clinically apparent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Journal of Medical Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Journal of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-04090-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-04090-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The relationship between osteoporosis and sarcopenia parameters in postmenopausal women under 60 years of age: A cross-sectional study.
Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of sarcopenia in postmenopausal women under the age of 60 and to evaluate the relationship between sarcopenia, bone mineral density (BMD), and clinical parameters.
Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study included 52 postmenopausal women under the age of 60, classified as osteoporotic or non-osteoporotic based on DXA results. Sarcopenia was assessed using the criteria of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2). Muscle strength was measured using handgrip strength and the five-time sit-to-stand test (5STS), and muscle mass was assessed with the Tanita BC-418MA device. Skeletal muscle mass indices (SMMI) were calculated based on height2, weight, and BMI.
Results: Fat-free mass (FFM), skeletal muscle mass (SMM), and SMM/height2 values were significantly lower in the osteoporotic group compared to the non-osteoporotic group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between the groups in handgrip strength or 5STS results. Sarcopenia prevalence varied depending on the muscle index used: 17.3% based on SMM/BMI (23.1% in the osteoporotic group, 11.5% in the non-osteoporotic group), 11.5% based on SMM/weight (3.8% vs. 19.2%), and 3.8% based on SMM/height2 (equal in both groups). These differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Femoral neck and lumbar BMD and T-scores showed positive correlations with FFM and SMM, but not with muscle strength tests.
Conclusion: In our study, sarcopenia prevalence did not significantly differ between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic postmenopausal women under 60. However, the lower muscle mass observed in the osteoporotic group may indicate early structural changes associated with sarcopenia. The lack of difference in functional capacity suggests that these changes may not yet be clinically apparent.
期刊介绍:
The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker.
The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.