The Role of leadership and technology in transforming medical education: Integrating health promotion strategies for improved curriculum and outcomes.

Background: This study evaluates the impact of transformational and supportive leadership on technology integration and its effects on curriculum enhancement and student competency in medical education. Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with data collected from medical education institutions, the analysis reveals that transformational leadership significantly positively influences technology integration, which in turn enhances curriculum design. Additionally, supportive leadership contributes positively to the successful implementation of technological tools within the curriculum. Adjustments involving dynamic curriculum design and health promotion strategies have been shown to improve student competency and workforce readiness. The synergy between transformational and supportive leadership further increases the effectiveness of technology integration. Health promotion strategies applied within the curriculum positively impact educational outcomes, including the improvement of students' practical skills. These findings underscore the importance of effective leadership, appropriate technology integration, and adaptive curriculum design in medical education. Policy recommendations include strengthening leadership support, implementing innovative technologies, and adjusting health promotion-based curricula to enhance the quality of medical education and workforce readiness.

Context: The field of medical education is rapidly evolving, making the integration of technology and adaptation of curricula to include dynamic health promotion strategies essential. This study examines the impact of leadership styles on technology integration and curriculum enhancement, aiming to improve student competence and workforce readiness. It addresses the need for educational institutions to align with contemporary health policy benchmarks and meet the increasing demand for innovative and responsive medical training programs.

Aims: This study aims to evaluate the impact of leadership styles on technology integration and curriculum enhancement in medical education, focusing on improving student competencies and workforce readiness.

Settings and design: The study was conducted at leading medical faculties in Indonesia, focusing on examining the relationships between leadership, technology integration, and curriculum adjustment in medical education.

Methods and material: Data were collected using a specially designed questionnaire and in-depth interviews with academic leaders and program managers. The sample included 300 respondents from various medical schools in Indonesia, chosen for their implementation of technology and adaptable curricula.

Statistical analysis used: Statistical analysis used SEM with SmartPLS to evaluate model relationships and validity, and thematic analysis for qualitative data.

Results: The study confirms that the model for educational development, incorporating leadership, technology, and curriculum adjustments, is both valid and reliable. Transformational Leadership positively influences technology integration, while Supportive Leadership similarly impacts technology use. Effective technology integration enhances curriculum quality, and curriculum enhancements significantly boost student competence and workforce readiness. Qualitative insights further support these results, highlighting the crucial role of leadership in facilitating integration and adaptation.

Conclusions: The study finds that effective leadership and technology integration are key to advancing medical education, enhancing curriculum design, and health promotion. Results align with health policy benchmarks, emphasizing leadership's role in improving educational outcomes and workforce readiness. Future research should assess the long-term impact and policy alignment of these strategies.