Hidehiro Oshibuchi, Hiroshi Nakamura, Kazumasa Yoshida, Jun Ishigooka, Katsuji Nishimura
{"title":"Montgomery-Åsberg抑郁评定量表与Sheehan残疾评定量表在双相抑郁发作患者中的关系。","authors":"Hidehiro Oshibuchi, Hiroshi Nakamura, Kazumasa Yoshida, Jun Ishigooka, Katsuji Nishimura","doi":"10.1080/13651501.2025.2560353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the relationship between depressive symptoms and daily functioning among patients with bipolar depression using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A post-hoc analysis was conducted using data from a placebo-controlled study of lurasidone involving 399 patients with bipolar depression. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to analyse the correlation between the MADRS and SDS total scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the MADRS cut-off score for adequate functional improvement, defined as all SDS subscale scores ≤2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MADRS and SDS scores were positively correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.764). The ROC analysis yielded a MADRS cut-off score of 15.5 for adequate functional improvement with 86.9% sensitivity and 75.9% specificity. The wide distribution of the relationship observed between symptoms and functioning indicated diversity in treatment responsiveness in bipolar depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Depressive symptoms and daily functioning are correlated; however, this relationship is not straightforward, highlighting the need for evaluating symptoms and functioning separately. Importantly, direct application of the statistical MADRS threshold in clinical practice may be inappropriate for estimating SDS-based functioning. Further research is needed to establish norms linking levels of symptoms and functioning in bipolar depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":14351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and Sheehan Disability Scale in patients with bipolar depressive episodes.\",\"authors\":\"Hidehiro Oshibuchi, Hiroshi Nakamura, Kazumasa Yoshida, Jun Ishigooka, Katsuji Nishimura\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13651501.2025.2560353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the relationship between depressive symptoms and daily functioning among patients with bipolar depression using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A post-hoc analysis was conducted using data from a placebo-controlled study of lurasidone involving 399 patients with bipolar depression. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to analyse the correlation between the MADRS and SDS total scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the MADRS cut-off score for adequate functional improvement, defined as all SDS subscale scores ≤2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MADRS and SDS scores were positively correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.764). The ROC analysis yielded a MADRS cut-off score of 15.5 for adequate functional improvement with 86.9% sensitivity and 75.9% specificity. The wide distribution of the relationship observed between symptoms and functioning indicated diversity in treatment responsiveness in bipolar depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Depressive symptoms and daily functioning are correlated; however, this relationship is not straightforward, highlighting the need for evaluating symptoms and functioning separately. Importantly, direct application of the statistical MADRS threshold in clinical practice may be inappropriate for estimating SDS-based functioning. Further research is needed to establish norms linking levels of symptoms and functioning in bipolar depression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2025.2560353\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2025.2560353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Relationship between the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and Sheehan Disability Scale in patients with bipolar depressive episodes.
Objective: To examine the relationship between depressive symptoms and daily functioning among patients with bipolar depression using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS).
Methods: A post-hoc analysis was conducted using data from a placebo-controlled study of lurasidone involving 399 patients with bipolar depression. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to analyse the correlation between the MADRS and SDS total scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the MADRS cut-off score for adequate functional improvement, defined as all SDS subscale scores ≤2.
Results: The MADRS and SDS scores were positively correlated (r = 0.764). The ROC analysis yielded a MADRS cut-off score of 15.5 for adequate functional improvement with 86.9% sensitivity and 75.9% specificity. The wide distribution of the relationship observed between symptoms and functioning indicated diversity in treatment responsiveness in bipolar depression.
Conclusions: Depressive symptoms and daily functioning are correlated; however, this relationship is not straightforward, highlighting the need for evaluating symptoms and functioning separately. Importantly, direct application of the statistical MADRS threshold in clinical practice may be inappropriate for estimating SDS-based functioning. Further research is needed to establish norms linking levels of symptoms and functioning in bipolar depression.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice provides an international forum for communication among health professionals with clinical, academic and research interests in psychiatry.
The journal gives particular emphasis to papers that integrate the findings of academic research into realities of clinical practice.
Focus on the practical aspects of managing and treating patients.
Essential reading for the busy psychiatrist, trainee and interested physician.
Includes original research papers, comprehensive review articles and short communications.
Key words: Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Mental health, Neuropsychiatry, Clinical Neurophysiology, Psychophysiology, Psychotherapy, Addiction, Schizophrenia, Depression, Bipolar Disorders and Anxiety.