Montgomery-Åsberg抑郁评定量表与Sheehan残疾评定量表在双相抑郁发作患者中的关系。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Hidehiro Oshibuchi, Hiroshi Nakamura, Kazumasa Yoshida, Jun Ishigooka, Katsuji Nishimura
{"title":"Montgomery-Åsberg抑郁评定量表与Sheehan残疾评定量表在双相抑郁发作患者中的关系。","authors":"Hidehiro Oshibuchi, Hiroshi Nakamura, Kazumasa Yoshida, Jun Ishigooka, Katsuji Nishimura","doi":"10.1080/13651501.2025.2560353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the relationship between depressive symptoms and daily functioning among patients with bipolar depression using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A post-hoc analysis was conducted using data from a placebo-controlled study of lurasidone involving 399 patients with bipolar depression. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to analyse the correlation between the MADRS and SDS total scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the MADRS cut-off score for adequate functional improvement, defined as all SDS subscale scores ≤2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MADRS and SDS scores were positively correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.764). The ROC analysis yielded a MADRS cut-off score of 15.5 for adequate functional improvement with 86.9% sensitivity and 75.9% specificity. The wide distribution of the relationship observed between symptoms and functioning indicated diversity in treatment responsiveness in bipolar depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Depressive symptoms and daily functioning are correlated; however, this relationship is not straightforward, highlighting the need for evaluating symptoms and functioning separately. Importantly, direct application of the statistical MADRS threshold in clinical practice may be inappropriate for estimating SDS-based functioning. Further research is needed to establish norms linking levels of symptoms and functioning in bipolar depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":14351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and Sheehan Disability Scale in patients with bipolar depressive episodes.\",\"authors\":\"Hidehiro Oshibuchi, Hiroshi Nakamura, Kazumasa Yoshida, Jun Ishigooka, Katsuji Nishimura\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13651501.2025.2560353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the relationship between depressive symptoms and daily functioning among patients with bipolar depression using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A post-hoc analysis was conducted using data from a placebo-controlled study of lurasidone involving 399 patients with bipolar depression. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to analyse the correlation between the MADRS and SDS total scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the MADRS cut-off score for adequate functional improvement, defined as all SDS subscale scores ≤2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MADRS and SDS scores were positively correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.764). The ROC analysis yielded a MADRS cut-off score of 15.5 for adequate functional improvement with 86.9% sensitivity and 75.9% specificity. The wide distribution of the relationship observed between symptoms and functioning indicated diversity in treatment responsiveness in bipolar depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Depressive symptoms and daily functioning are correlated; however, this relationship is not straightforward, highlighting the need for evaluating symptoms and functioning separately. Importantly, direct application of the statistical MADRS threshold in clinical practice may be inappropriate for estimating SDS-based functioning. Further research is needed to establish norms linking levels of symptoms and functioning in bipolar depression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2025.2560353\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2025.2560353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:应用Montgomery-Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)和Sheehan残疾量表(SDS)探讨双相抑郁症患者抑郁症状与日常功能的关系。方法:对399例双相抑郁症患者的鲁拉西酮安慰剂对照研究数据进行事后分析。采用Pearson相关系数分析MADRS与SDS总分的相关性。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析确定了足够功能改善的MADRS截止分数,定义为所有SDS分量表得分≤2。结果:MADRS评分与SDS评分呈正相关(r = 0.764)。ROC分析得出的MADRS截止评分为15.5分,敏感性为86.9%,特异性为75.9%。观察到的症状和功能之间关系的广泛分布表明双相抑郁症治疗反应性的多样性。结论:抑郁症状与日常功能存在相关性;然而,这种关系并不是直截了当的,强调了单独评估症状和功能的必要性。重要的是,在临床实践中直接应用统计MADRS阈值可能不适合估计基于sds的功能。需要进一步的研究来建立双相抑郁症的症状和功能水平之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship between the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and Sheehan Disability Scale in patients with bipolar depressive episodes.

Objective: To examine the relationship between depressive symptoms and daily functioning among patients with bipolar depression using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS).

Methods: A post-hoc analysis was conducted using data from a placebo-controlled study of lurasidone involving 399 patients with bipolar depression. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to analyse the correlation between the MADRS and SDS total scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the MADRS cut-off score for adequate functional improvement, defined as all SDS subscale scores ≤2.

Results: The MADRS and SDS scores were positively correlated (r = 0.764). The ROC analysis yielded a MADRS cut-off score of 15.5 for adequate functional improvement with 86.9% sensitivity and 75.9% specificity. The wide distribution of the relationship observed between symptoms and functioning indicated diversity in treatment responsiveness in bipolar depression.

Conclusions: Depressive symptoms and daily functioning are correlated; however, this relationship is not straightforward, highlighting the need for evaluating symptoms and functioning separately. Importantly, direct application of the statistical MADRS threshold in clinical practice may be inappropriate for estimating SDS-based functioning. Further research is needed to establish norms linking levels of symptoms and functioning in bipolar depression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice provides an international forum for communication among health professionals with clinical, academic and research interests in psychiatry. The journal gives particular emphasis to papers that integrate the findings of academic research into realities of clinical practice. Focus on the practical aspects of managing and treating patients. Essential reading for the busy psychiatrist, trainee and interested physician. Includes original research papers, comprehensive review articles and short communications. Key words: Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Mental health, Neuropsychiatry, Clinical Neurophysiology, Psychophysiology, Psychotherapy, Addiction, Schizophrenia, Depression, Bipolar Disorders and Anxiety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信