Zehra Şahin, Şenay Erdoğan Durmuş, Deniz Ünlüer Kapışkay, Ahmet Baş, Nesrin Uygun
{"title":"细针穿刺活检和快速现场评估在肾脏病变诊断中的作用。","authors":"Zehra Şahin, Şenay Erdoğan Durmuş, Deniz Ünlüer Kapışkay, Ahmet Baş, Nesrin Uygun","doi":"10.1002/dc.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although core needle biopsy is widely preferred for evaluating renal lesions, fine needle aspiration (FNA) combined with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) remains a valuable diagnostic method in selected cases. This study aims to assess the diagnostic efficacy of renal FNA and highlight the impact of ROSE on achieving definitive diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 273 patients who underwent ultrasound- or CT-guided FNA for renal lesions between 2010 and 2018 at Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine. Lesions were evaluated based on size, radiologic features, localization, ROSE status, and number of smears. Cytopathological results were categorized as nondiagnostic, limited, non-neoplastic, or neoplastic. Histopathological correlation was assessed in available cases. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v25.0, with p < 0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 273 cases, 218 (79.8%) yielded diagnostic results. Definitive diagnosis rates increased with lesion size and were significantly higher in solid (86.3%) and mixed (91.4%) lesions compared to cystic lesions (60%) (p = 0.001). ROSE was performed in 177 cases, significantly improving diagnostic yield compared to cases without ROSE (85.8% vs. 68.7%, p = 0.001). Histopathological follow-up was available in 119 cases, with an overall cytological-histological concordance of 84%, reaching 98% in cases with adequate material.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Renal FNA remains a reliable and accurate diagnostic method when combined with ROSE, especially in well-sampled cases. It aids in identifying both primary and metastatic tumors and can guide clinical decision-making, particularly when surgery is not feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy and Rapid Onsite Evaluation in the Diagnosis of Kidney Lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Zehra Şahin, Şenay Erdoğan Durmuş, Deniz Ünlüer Kapışkay, Ahmet Baş, Nesrin Uygun\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dc.70025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although core needle biopsy is widely preferred for evaluating renal lesions, fine needle aspiration (FNA) combined with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) remains a valuable diagnostic method in selected cases. This study aims to assess the diagnostic efficacy of renal FNA and highlight the impact of ROSE on achieving definitive diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 273 patients who underwent ultrasound- or CT-guided FNA for renal lesions between 2010 and 2018 at Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine. Lesions were evaluated based on size, radiologic features, localization, ROSE status, and number of smears. Cytopathological results were categorized as nondiagnostic, limited, non-neoplastic, or neoplastic. Histopathological correlation was assessed in available cases. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v25.0, with p < 0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 273 cases, 218 (79.8%) yielded diagnostic results. Definitive diagnosis rates increased with lesion size and were significantly higher in solid (86.3%) and mixed (91.4%) lesions compared to cystic lesions (60%) (p = 0.001). ROSE was performed in 177 cases, significantly improving diagnostic yield compared to cases without ROSE (85.8% vs. 68.7%, p = 0.001). Histopathological follow-up was available in 119 cases, with an overall cytological-histological concordance of 84%, reaching 98% in cases with adequate material.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Renal FNA remains a reliable and accurate diagnostic method when combined with ROSE, especially in well-sampled cases. It aids in identifying both primary and metastatic tumors and can guide clinical decision-making, particularly when surgery is not feasible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic Cytopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.70025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.70025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:虽然核心穿刺活检被广泛用于评估肾脏病变,但细针穿刺(FNA)联合快速现场评估(ROSE)在某些病例中仍然是一种有价值的诊断方法。本研究旨在评估肾FNA的诊断效果,并强调ROSE对获得明确诊断的影响。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2010年至2018年间在伊斯坦布尔大学cerrahpa医学院接受超声或ct引导下肾病变FNA治疗的273例患者。根据病变的大小、放射学特征、定位、ROSE状态和涂片数量来评估病变。细胞病理学结果分为非诊断性、有限性、非肿瘤性和肿瘤性。对可用病例进行组织病理学相关性评估。结果:273例患者中,218例(79.8%)获得诊断结果。明确诊断率随病变大小而增加,实性病变(86.3%)和混合性病变(91.4%)明显高于囊性病变(60%)(p = 0.001)。177例患者行ROSE检查,与未行ROSE检查的患者相比,显著提高了诊断率(85.8% vs. 68.7%, p = 0.001)。组织病理学随访119例,总体细胞学-组织学一致性为84%,在材料充足的病例中达到98%。结论:肾FNA联合ROSE仍然是一种可靠和准确的诊断方法,特别是在样本充足的病例中。它有助于识别原发性和转移性肿瘤,并可以指导临床决策,特别是在手术不可行的情况下。
The Role of Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy and Rapid Onsite Evaluation in the Diagnosis of Kidney Lesions.
Background: Although core needle biopsy is widely preferred for evaluating renal lesions, fine needle aspiration (FNA) combined with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) remains a valuable diagnostic method in selected cases. This study aims to assess the diagnostic efficacy of renal FNA and highlight the impact of ROSE on achieving definitive diagnoses.
Methods: This retrospective study included 273 patients who underwent ultrasound- or CT-guided FNA for renal lesions between 2010 and 2018 at Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine. Lesions were evaluated based on size, radiologic features, localization, ROSE status, and number of smears. Cytopathological results were categorized as nondiagnostic, limited, non-neoplastic, or neoplastic. Histopathological correlation was assessed in available cases. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v25.0, with p < 0.05 considered significant.
Results: Of the 273 cases, 218 (79.8%) yielded diagnostic results. Definitive diagnosis rates increased with lesion size and were significantly higher in solid (86.3%) and mixed (91.4%) lesions compared to cystic lesions (60%) (p = 0.001). ROSE was performed in 177 cases, significantly improving diagnostic yield compared to cases without ROSE (85.8% vs. 68.7%, p = 0.001). Histopathological follow-up was available in 119 cases, with an overall cytological-histological concordance of 84%, reaching 98% in cases with adequate material.
Conclusion: Renal FNA remains a reliable and accurate diagnostic method when combined with ROSE, especially in well-sampled cases. It aids in identifying both primary and metastatic tumors and can guide clinical decision-making, particularly when surgery is not feasible.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic Cytopathology is intended to provide a forum for the exchange of information in the field of cytopathology, with special emphasis on the practical, clinical aspects of the discipline. The editors invite original scientific articles, as well as special review articles, feature articles, and letters to the editor, from laboratory professionals engaged in the practice of cytopathology. Manuscripts are accepted for publication on the basis of scientific merit, practical significance, and suitability for publication in a journal dedicated to this discipline. Original articles can be considered only with the understanding that they have never been published before and that they have not been submitted for simultaneous review to another publication.