{"title":"聚合物基台与钛基台对种植体周围组织影响的临床比较研究。","authors":"Piyush Javiya, Chinju Punnen, Dipak Chaudhari, Paridhi Sharma, Snehamoy Pradhan, Deepak Sharma, Miral Mehta","doi":"10.6026/973206300211514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The evaluation between titanium and polymer abutments regarding peri-implant soft tissue health took place in a study involving 40 patients with posterior implants. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the plaque index (PI), Bleeding on probing (BOP) and Probing depth (PD) together with radiographic bone level assessments at three specified time points: baseline and 3 months as well as 6 months. The clinical assessment of Group B (polymer) at 6 months revealed superior outcomes including a decreased PI score to 0.88 alongside reduced BOP to 10% and contractions in PD up to 2.6 mm compared to 0.92 PI, 15% BOP and 2.9 mm PD. Group B participants showed smaller marginal bone loss than Group A with differences at 0.38 mm vs. 0.45 mm although results were not statistically meaningful. Patients obtained better results from polymer abutments although both types of abutment functioned properly.</p>","PeriodicalId":8962,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformation","volume":"21 6","pages":"1514-1517"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the effect of polymer and titanium abutments on peri-implant tissues: A comparative clinical study.\",\"authors\":\"Piyush Javiya, Chinju Punnen, Dipak Chaudhari, Paridhi Sharma, Snehamoy Pradhan, Deepak Sharma, Miral Mehta\",\"doi\":\"10.6026/973206300211514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The evaluation between titanium and polymer abutments regarding peri-implant soft tissue health took place in a study involving 40 patients with posterior implants. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the plaque index (PI), Bleeding on probing (BOP) and Probing depth (PD) together with radiographic bone level assessments at three specified time points: baseline and 3 months as well as 6 months. The clinical assessment of Group B (polymer) at 6 months revealed superior outcomes including a decreased PI score to 0.88 alongside reduced BOP to 10% and contractions in PD up to 2.6 mm compared to 0.92 PI, 15% BOP and 2.9 mm PD. Group B participants showed smaller marginal bone loss than Group A with differences at 0.38 mm vs. 0.45 mm although results were not statistically meaningful. Patients obtained better results from polymer abutments although both types of abutment functioned properly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioinformation\",\"volume\":\"21 6\",\"pages\":\"1514-1517\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449497/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioinformation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300211514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300211514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在一项涉及40例后路种植体患者的研究中,评估了钛基牙和聚合物基牙对种植体周围软组织健康的影响。因此,在三个指定的时间点(基线、3个月和6个月)评估斑块指数(PI)、探探出血(BOP)和探探深度(PD)以及x线骨水平评估是有意义的。6个月时,B组(聚合物)的临床评估显示出更好的结果,包括PI评分降至0.88,BOP降至10%,PD收缩达2.6 mm,而对照组为0.92 PI, 15% BOP和2.9 mm PD。B组患者的边缘骨质流失比A组小,差异为0.38 mm和0.45 mm,但结果没有统计学意义。尽管两种类型的基台功能正常,但聚合物基台的效果更好。
Evaluating the effect of polymer and titanium abutments on peri-implant tissues: A comparative clinical study.
The evaluation between titanium and polymer abutments regarding peri-implant soft tissue health took place in a study involving 40 patients with posterior implants. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the plaque index (PI), Bleeding on probing (BOP) and Probing depth (PD) together with radiographic bone level assessments at three specified time points: baseline and 3 months as well as 6 months. The clinical assessment of Group B (polymer) at 6 months revealed superior outcomes including a decreased PI score to 0.88 alongside reduced BOP to 10% and contractions in PD up to 2.6 mm compared to 0.92 PI, 15% BOP and 2.9 mm PD. Group B participants showed smaller marginal bone loss than Group A with differences at 0.38 mm vs. 0.45 mm although results were not statistically meaningful. Patients obtained better results from polymer abutments although both types of abutment functioned properly.