Ken Nakahara, Daisuke Obinata, Sho Hashimoto, Kazuki Ohashi, Yuki Inagaki, Tsuyoshi Yoshizawa, Junichi Mochida, Kenya Yamaguchi, Satoru Takahashi
{"title":"使用BiopSee®MRI/超声融合活检增强检测靶向和非靶向区域的临床显著性前列腺癌。","authors":"Ken Nakahara, Daisuke Obinata, Sho Hashimoto, Kazuki Ohashi, Yuki Inagaki, Tsuyoshi Yoshizawa, Junichi Mochida, Kenya Yamaguchi, Satoru Takahashi","doi":"10.62347/QODA6396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee<sup>®</sup> system in patients assessed with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1, focusing on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in regions of interest (ROI) and non-ROI areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients who underwent fusion biopsy between February and November 2024. Detection rates of csPCa (grade group ≥ 2) were compared between the ROI and non-ROI regions, and clinical and biopsy characteristics were compared between patients with and without csPCa. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of csPCa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median patient age was 74 years, with a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 8.93 ng/mL. The csPCa detection rate was significantly higher in the ROI than in the non-ROI regions (61% vs. 44%, P = 0.012). Across the cohort, PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were more common than PI-RADS 3 lesions. A higher PI-RADS score (4 or 5) was identified as a significant predictor of csPCa detection (odds ratio 5.14, P = 0.034), whereas age, PSA, number of ROIs, and biopsy core numbers were not significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fusion biopsy using the BiopSee<sup>®</sup> system achieved a high csPCa detection rate in targeted ROIs, especially for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, while also highlighting the importance of combining systematic biopsy with targeted approaches because of the substantial proportion of csPCa detected in non-ROI regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7438,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","volume":"13 4","pages":"265-271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in targeted and non-targeted regions using BiopSee<sup>®</sup> MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy.\",\"authors\":\"Ken Nakahara, Daisuke Obinata, Sho Hashimoto, Kazuki Ohashi, Yuki Inagaki, Tsuyoshi Yoshizawa, Junichi Mochida, Kenya Yamaguchi, Satoru Takahashi\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/QODA6396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee<sup>®</sup> system in patients assessed with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1, focusing on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in regions of interest (ROI) and non-ROI areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients who underwent fusion biopsy between February and November 2024. Detection rates of csPCa (grade group ≥ 2) were compared between the ROI and non-ROI regions, and clinical and biopsy characteristics were compared between patients with and without csPCa. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of csPCa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median patient age was 74 years, with a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 8.93 ng/mL. The csPCa detection rate was significantly higher in the ROI than in the non-ROI regions (61% vs. 44%, P = 0.012). Across the cohort, PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were more common than PI-RADS 3 lesions. A higher PI-RADS score (4 or 5) was identified as a significant predictor of csPCa detection (odds ratio 5.14, P = 0.034), whereas age, PSA, number of ROIs, and biopsy core numbers were not significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fusion biopsy using the BiopSee<sup>®</sup> system achieved a high csPCa detection rate in targeted ROIs, especially for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, while also highlighting the importance of combining systematic biopsy with targeted approaches because of the substantial proportion of csPCa detected in non-ROI regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of clinical and experimental urology\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"265-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444391/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of clinical and experimental urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/QODA6396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/QODA6396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究评估了使用BiopSee®系统在前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS) 2.1版评估的患者中使用磁共振成像/经直肠超声融合引导活检(融合活检)的癌症检测概况,重点关注感兴趣区域(ROI)和非ROI区域的临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)检测。方法:回顾性分析2024年2月至11月间行融合活检的59例患者。比较ROI区和非ROI区csPCa检出率(分级组≥2),比较有csPCa和无csPCa患者的临床和活检特征。采用单因素logistic回归分析确定csPCa的预测因素。结果:患者中位年龄为74岁,中位前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平为8.93 ng/mL。csPCa在ROI区域的检出率明显高于non-ROI区域(61% vs. 44%, P = 0.012)。在整个队列中,PI-RADS 4和5病变比PI-RADS 3病变更常见。较高的PI-RADS评分(4或5)被认为是csPCa检测的重要预测因子(优势比5.14,P = 0.034),而年龄、PSA、roi数量和活检核心数量不是显著预测因子。结论:使用BiopSee®系统的融合活检在靶向roi中获得了很高的csPCa检出率,特别是对于PI-RADS 4和5病变,同时也强调了将系统活检与靶向方法相结合的重要性,因为在非roi区域检测到相当大比例的csPCa。
Enhanced detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in targeted and non-targeted regions using BiopSee® MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy.
Objectives: This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee® system in patients assessed with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1, focusing on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in regions of interest (ROI) and non-ROI areas.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients who underwent fusion biopsy between February and November 2024. Detection rates of csPCa (grade group ≥ 2) were compared between the ROI and non-ROI regions, and clinical and biopsy characteristics were compared between patients with and without csPCa. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of csPCa.
Results: The median patient age was 74 years, with a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 8.93 ng/mL. The csPCa detection rate was significantly higher in the ROI than in the non-ROI regions (61% vs. 44%, P = 0.012). Across the cohort, PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were more common than PI-RADS 3 lesions. A higher PI-RADS score (4 or 5) was identified as a significant predictor of csPCa detection (odds ratio 5.14, P = 0.034), whereas age, PSA, number of ROIs, and biopsy core numbers were not significant predictors.
Conclusions: Fusion biopsy using the BiopSee® system achieved a high csPCa detection rate in targeted ROIs, especially for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, while also highlighting the importance of combining systematic biopsy with targeted approaches because of the substantial proportion of csPCa detected in non-ROI regions.