形成真正的纽带:易感染艾滋病毒的顺性别妇女的艾滋病毒研究保留策略。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Victoria W McDonald, Jessica Corcoran, Alexandria L Hahn, Corilyn Ott, Mirjam-Colette Kempf, Rebecca Schnall, Amy K Johnson
{"title":"形成真正的纽带:易感染艾滋病毒的顺性别妇女的艾滋病毒研究保留策略。","authors":"Victoria W McDonald, Jessica Corcoran, Alexandria L Hahn, Corilyn Ott, Mirjam-Colette Kempf, Rebecca Schnall, Amy K Johnson","doi":"10.1177/10872914251379045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cisgender women face significant HIV risks in the United States yet retention in prevention research is challenging. The same factors that increase HIV vulnerability also create barriers to research participation. This qualitative study explored multilevel barriers and facilitators to retaining cisgender women with increased HIV prevention needs in research using the social ecological model (SEM). Semi-structured interviews were conducted from August 2023 to February 2024 with 114 participants across three groups: HIV-negative cisgender women with increased HIV prevention needs (<i>n</i> = 34), cisgender women living with HIV (<i>n</i> = 40), and HIV prevention/treatment stakeholders (<i>n</i> = 40). Participants were recruited nationally through convenience sampling via social media and organizations. Directed content analysis was used to identify retention factors across individual, environmental, intervention, and structural levels. Barriers included substance use affecting contact maintenance, concerns about study time commitments, frustrations with unclear study procedures, poor staff rapport, safety concerns around intimate partner violence, historical research mistrust, and systemic vulnerabilities like housing instability. Facilitators included creating affirming environments that fostered purpose, flexible scheduling with incremental compensation, clear study expectations and health education/support, authentic staff relationships, discrete communication methods, transparent study procedures and approaches, virtual visit options, and availability of multiple contact methods. Findings corroborated a key paradox: those most vulnerable to HIV acquisition may be least likely to complete longitudinal studies due to structural barriers. Successful retention requires flexible approaches that address barriers at all SEM levels. These findings provide strategies for researchers to improve retention among cisgender women with increased HIV prevention needs, strengthening research representativeness and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":7476,"journal":{"name":"AIDS patient care and STDs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forming Genuine Bonds: HIV Research Retention Strategies for Cisgender Women Vulnerable to HIV Acquisition.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria W McDonald, Jessica Corcoran, Alexandria L Hahn, Corilyn Ott, Mirjam-Colette Kempf, Rebecca Schnall, Amy K Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10872914251379045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cisgender women face significant HIV risks in the United States yet retention in prevention research is challenging. The same factors that increase HIV vulnerability also create barriers to research participation. This qualitative study explored multilevel barriers and facilitators to retaining cisgender women with increased HIV prevention needs in research using the social ecological model (SEM). Semi-structured interviews were conducted from August 2023 to February 2024 with 114 participants across three groups: HIV-negative cisgender women with increased HIV prevention needs (<i>n</i> = 34), cisgender women living with HIV (<i>n</i> = 40), and HIV prevention/treatment stakeholders (<i>n</i> = 40). Participants were recruited nationally through convenience sampling via social media and organizations. Directed content analysis was used to identify retention factors across individual, environmental, intervention, and structural levels. Barriers included substance use affecting contact maintenance, concerns about study time commitments, frustrations with unclear study procedures, poor staff rapport, safety concerns around intimate partner violence, historical research mistrust, and systemic vulnerabilities like housing instability. Facilitators included creating affirming environments that fostered purpose, flexible scheduling with incremental compensation, clear study expectations and health education/support, authentic staff relationships, discrete communication methods, transparent study procedures and approaches, virtual visit options, and availability of multiple contact methods. Findings corroborated a key paradox: those most vulnerable to HIV acquisition may be least likely to complete longitudinal studies due to structural barriers. Successful retention requires flexible approaches that address barriers at all SEM levels. These findings provide strategies for researchers to improve retention among cisgender women with increased HIV prevention needs, strengthening research representativeness and effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS patient care and STDs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS patient care and STDs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10872914251379045\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS patient care and STDs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10872914251379045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,顺性女性面临着重大的艾滋病风险,但在预防研究中保留是具有挑战性的。增加艾滋病毒易感性的同样因素也为参与研究制造了障碍。本质性研究利用社会生态模型(SEM)探讨了保留艾滋病预防需求增加的顺性女性的多重障碍和促进因素。从2023年8月到2024年2月,对114名参与者进行了半结构化访谈,分为三组:艾滋病毒阴性、艾滋病毒预防需求增加的顺性女性(n = 34)、感染艾滋病毒的顺性女性(n = 40)和艾滋病毒预防/治疗利益相关者(n = 40)。参与者通过社交媒体和组织在全国范围内进行方便抽样。定向内容分析用于确定个人、环境、干预和结构层面的保留因素。障碍包括影响接触维持的物质使用、对学习时间承诺的担忧、对研究程序不明确的失望、工作人员关系不融洽、对亲密伴侣暴力的安全担忧、对历史研究的不信任以及住房不稳定等系统性脆弱性。促进因素包括创造肯定的环境,培养目标、灵活的时间表和增量补偿、明确的研究期望和健康教育/支持、真实的工作人员关系、离散的沟通方法、透明的研究程序和方法、虚拟访问选项以及多种联系方法的可用性。研究结果证实了一个关键的悖论:由于结构性障碍,那些最容易感染艾滋病毒的人可能最不可能完成纵向研究。成功的留存需要灵活的方法来解决所有SEM级别的障碍。这些发现为研究人员提高对艾滋病预防需求增加的顺性女性的保留率,加强研究的代表性和有效性提供了策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forming Genuine Bonds: HIV Research Retention Strategies for Cisgender Women Vulnerable to HIV Acquisition.

Cisgender women face significant HIV risks in the United States yet retention in prevention research is challenging. The same factors that increase HIV vulnerability also create barriers to research participation. This qualitative study explored multilevel barriers and facilitators to retaining cisgender women with increased HIV prevention needs in research using the social ecological model (SEM). Semi-structured interviews were conducted from August 2023 to February 2024 with 114 participants across three groups: HIV-negative cisgender women with increased HIV prevention needs (n = 34), cisgender women living with HIV (n = 40), and HIV prevention/treatment stakeholders (n = 40). Participants were recruited nationally through convenience sampling via social media and organizations. Directed content analysis was used to identify retention factors across individual, environmental, intervention, and structural levels. Barriers included substance use affecting contact maintenance, concerns about study time commitments, frustrations with unclear study procedures, poor staff rapport, safety concerns around intimate partner violence, historical research mistrust, and systemic vulnerabilities like housing instability. Facilitators included creating affirming environments that fostered purpose, flexible scheduling with incremental compensation, clear study expectations and health education/support, authentic staff relationships, discrete communication methods, transparent study procedures and approaches, virtual visit options, and availability of multiple contact methods. Findings corroborated a key paradox: those most vulnerable to HIV acquisition may be least likely to complete longitudinal studies due to structural barriers. Successful retention requires flexible approaches that address barriers at all SEM levels. These findings provide strategies for researchers to improve retention among cisgender women with increased HIV prevention needs, strengthening research representativeness and effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIDS patient care and STDs
AIDS patient care and STDs 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
22.40%
发文量
67
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: AIDS Patient Care and STDs is the foremost journal providing the latest developments and research in diagnostics and therapeutics designed to prolong the lifespan and improve quality of life for HIV/AIDS patients. The Journal delivers cutting-edge clinical, basic science, sociologic, and behavior-based investigations in HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections. Clinical trials, quantitative and qualitative analyses of pilot studies, comprehensive reviews, and case reports are presented from leading experts and scientists around the world. AIDS Patient Care and STDs coverage includes: Prominent AIDS medications, therapies, and antiretroviral agents HIV/AIDS-related diseases, infections, and complications Challenges of medication adherence Current prevention techniques for HIV The latest news and developments on other STDs Treatment/prevention options, including pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信