{"title":"智能手机摄影在伤口手术临床决策中的应用:可靠吗?","authors":"Ravit Yanko, Rachel Biesse, Gon Shoham, Riham Kheir, Orel Govrin-Yehudain, Zohar Golan, David Leshem, Yoav Barnea, Eyal Gur, Ehud Fliss","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smartphone photography may play a role in various aspects of clinical practice in wound surgery. Its accuracy as a tool for wound assessment and clinical decision-making is yet to be proven. Moreover, data regarding the magnitude of its use in practice are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven board-certified plastic surgeons performed 79 wound observations and completed a questionnaire regarding wound properties and decisions regarding management. Wounds were photographed using smartphones at the time of initial wound observation. At least 3 months later, photographs of the wounds were anonymously presented to the same surgeons who completed the questionnaires again. Statistical analysis was used to compare the results. In addition, an online survey was used to assess the magnitude and manner of smartphone photography use among plastic surgeons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of bedside and photographic wound evaluation found no statistically significant differences in nearly all descriptive wound parameters and aspects of clinical decision-making. Statistically significant differences were found for periwound subcutaneous space assessment (P=.02) and recommendation for operative wound closure (P=.035). Seventy-four plastic surgeons replied to the online survey, and 93% of them stated that they use smartphone photography in their daily practice, with the majority using it equally for patient follow-up, consulting other physicians, and communication with patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smartphone photography seems to play a major role in present-day clinical practice. According to the findings of this study, assessment of wounds via smartphone photography can be safely used as an adjunct for clinical decision-making when used as a consultation aid between wound surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":"38 9","pages":"E98-E106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Smartphone Photography for Clinical Decision-Making in Wound Surgery: Is It Reliable?\",\"authors\":\"Ravit Yanko, Rachel Biesse, Gon Shoham, Riham Kheir, Orel Govrin-Yehudain, Zohar Golan, David Leshem, Yoav Barnea, Eyal Gur, Ehud Fliss\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smartphone photography may play a role in various aspects of clinical practice in wound surgery. Its accuracy as a tool for wound assessment and clinical decision-making is yet to be proven. Moreover, data regarding the magnitude of its use in practice are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven board-certified plastic surgeons performed 79 wound observations and completed a questionnaire regarding wound properties and decisions regarding management. Wounds were photographed using smartphones at the time of initial wound observation. At least 3 months later, photographs of the wounds were anonymously presented to the same surgeons who completed the questionnaires again. Statistical analysis was used to compare the results. In addition, an online survey was used to assess the magnitude and manner of smartphone photography use among plastic surgeons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of bedside and photographic wound evaluation found no statistically significant differences in nearly all descriptive wound parameters and aspects of clinical decision-making. Statistically significant differences were found for periwound subcutaneous space assessment (P=.02) and recommendation for operative wound closure (P=.035). Seventy-four plastic surgeons replied to the online survey, and 93% of them stated that they use smartphone photography in their daily practice, with the majority using it equally for patient follow-up, consulting other physicians, and communication with patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smartphone photography seems to play a major role in present-day clinical practice. According to the findings of this study, assessment of wounds via smartphone photography can be safely used as an adjunct for clinical decision-making when used as a consultation aid between wound surgeons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Skin & Wound Care\",\"volume\":\"38 9\",\"pages\":\"E98-E106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Skin & Wound Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000342\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of Smartphone Photography for Clinical Decision-Making in Wound Surgery: Is It Reliable?
Background: Smartphone photography may play a role in various aspects of clinical practice in wound surgery. Its accuracy as a tool for wound assessment and clinical decision-making is yet to be proven. Moreover, data regarding the magnitude of its use in practice are lacking.
Methods: Eleven board-certified plastic surgeons performed 79 wound observations and completed a questionnaire regarding wound properties and decisions regarding management. Wounds were photographed using smartphones at the time of initial wound observation. At least 3 months later, photographs of the wounds were anonymously presented to the same surgeons who completed the questionnaires again. Statistical analysis was used to compare the results. In addition, an online survey was used to assess the magnitude and manner of smartphone photography use among plastic surgeons.
Results: Comparison of bedside and photographic wound evaluation found no statistically significant differences in nearly all descriptive wound parameters and aspects of clinical decision-making. Statistically significant differences were found for periwound subcutaneous space assessment (P=.02) and recommendation for operative wound closure (P=.035). Seventy-four plastic surgeons replied to the online survey, and 93% of them stated that they use smartphone photography in their daily practice, with the majority using it equally for patient follow-up, consulting other physicians, and communication with patients.
Conclusions: Smartphone photography seems to play a major role in present-day clinical practice. According to the findings of this study, assessment of wounds via smartphone photography can be safely used as an adjunct for clinical decision-making when used as a consultation aid between wound surgeons.
期刊介绍:
A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.