Trenton M Haltom, Susie Q Lew, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer, Glenn M Chertow, Allison Jaure, Kevin F Erickson
{"title":"肾内科医生在中心血液透析中使用远程医疗的观点:一项定性研究。","authors":"Trenton M Haltom, Susie Q Lew, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer, Glenn M Chertow, Allison Jaure, Kevin F Erickson","doi":"10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale & objective: </strong>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the United States (US) government expanded originating telemedicine sites to include outpatient dialysis units. For the first time, nephrology care providers (nephrologists and affiliated advanced practice providers) across the US could use telemedicine in lieu of face-to-face visits to deliver care for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. In this study, we describe perspectives and experiences of nephrologists using telemedicine to deliver in-center hemodialysis care.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Qualitative research study.</p><p><strong>Setting & participants: </strong>Nephrologists in three health systems who used telemedicine for in-center hemodialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Analytical approach: </strong>We conducted 16 semi-structured telephone interviews. Transcripts were thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified five themes and respective subthemes: maintaining safety and quality of care (making up missed appointments, fostering continuity of care, addressing urgent medical issues); maximizing efficiency (reducing nephrologist's travel burden, allowing for flexibility); operational complexities (dependence on facility resources; challenges coordinating with facility staff; modifying visit duration/length); diminished depth of clinical encounters (excess formality, constrained communication, incomplete physical exams); supporting confidence in telemedicine (complementing in-person care, accounting for patient preferences, requiring reimbursement).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The transferability of the findings outside of an urban academic setting is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although nephrologists encountered operational (both technical and personal level) challenges such as communication constraints when using telemedicine for in-center hemodialysis care, they reported improvements in aspects of care quality and enhanced efficiency. These findings inform the potential use of a hybrid in-center hemodialysis care delivery model in which telemedicine supplements in-person visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":7419,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nephrologist Perspectives on Using Telemedicine During In-Center Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Trenton M Haltom, Susie Q Lew, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer, Glenn M Chertow, Allison Jaure, Kevin F Erickson\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale & objective: </strong>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the United States (US) government expanded originating telemedicine sites to include outpatient dialysis units. For the first time, nephrology care providers (nephrologists and affiliated advanced practice providers) across the US could use telemedicine in lieu of face-to-face visits to deliver care for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. In this study, we describe perspectives and experiences of nephrologists using telemedicine to deliver in-center hemodialysis care.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Qualitative research study.</p><p><strong>Setting & participants: </strong>Nephrologists in three health systems who used telemedicine for in-center hemodialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Analytical approach: </strong>We conducted 16 semi-structured telephone interviews. Transcripts were thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified five themes and respective subthemes: maintaining safety and quality of care (making up missed appointments, fostering continuity of care, addressing urgent medical issues); maximizing efficiency (reducing nephrologist's travel burden, allowing for flexibility); operational complexities (dependence on facility resources; challenges coordinating with facility staff; modifying visit duration/length); diminished depth of clinical encounters (excess formality, constrained communication, incomplete physical exams); supporting confidence in telemedicine (complementing in-person care, accounting for patient preferences, requiring reimbursement).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The transferability of the findings outside of an urban academic setting is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although nephrologists encountered operational (both technical and personal level) challenges such as communication constraints when using telemedicine for in-center hemodialysis care, they reported improvements in aspects of care quality and enhanced efficiency. These findings inform the potential use of a hybrid in-center hemodialysis care delivery model in which telemedicine supplements in-person visits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Kidney Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Kidney Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.08.008\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.08.008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nephrologist Perspectives on Using Telemedicine During In-Center Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study.
Rationale & objective: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the United States (US) government expanded originating telemedicine sites to include outpatient dialysis units. For the first time, nephrology care providers (nephrologists and affiliated advanced practice providers) across the US could use telemedicine in lieu of face-to-face visits to deliver care for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. In this study, we describe perspectives and experiences of nephrologists using telemedicine to deliver in-center hemodialysis care.
Study design: Qualitative research study.
Setting & participants: Nephrologists in three health systems who used telemedicine for in-center hemodialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Analytical approach: We conducted 16 semi-structured telephone interviews. Transcripts were thematically analyzed.
Results: We identified five themes and respective subthemes: maintaining safety and quality of care (making up missed appointments, fostering continuity of care, addressing urgent medical issues); maximizing efficiency (reducing nephrologist's travel burden, allowing for flexibility); operational complexities (dependence on facility resources; challenges coordinating with facility staff; modifying visit duration/length); diminished depth of clinical encounters (excess formality, constrained communication, incomplete physical exams); supporting confidence in telemedicine (complementing in-person care, accounting for patient preferences, requiring reimbursement).
Limitations: The transferability of the findings outside of an urban academic setting is uncertain.
Conclusion: Although nephrologists encountered operational (both technical and personal level) challenges such as communication constraints when using telemedicine for in-center hemodialysis care, they reported improvements in aspects of care quality and enhanced efficiency. These findings inform the potential use of a hybrid in-center hemodialysis care delivery model in which telemedicine supplements in-person visits.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Kidney Diseases (AJKD), the National Kidney Foundation's official journal, is globally recognized for its leadership in clinical nephrology content. Monthly, AJKD publishes original investigations on kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis therapies, and kidney transplantation. Rigorous peer-review, statistical scrutiny, and a structured format characterize the publication process. Each issue includes case reports unveiling new diseases and potential therapeutic strategies.