替西莫司与帕唑帕尼治疗晚期肾细胞癌的疗效:荟萃分析。

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
American journal of clinical and experimental urology Pub Date : 2025-08-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/XJDW3310
Yanni Liu, Cuixue Jiang, Guoyang Zhang, Xiuxia Wang, Ruke Sha, Mingyue Liu, Junyi Ma, Zhaohan Sun, Shuo Shen, Yujie Qiu, Shengdong Zhu, Guangbin Sun, Sen Xu, Meiyan Song
{"title":"替西莫司与帕唑帕尼治疗晚期肾细胞癌的疗效:荟萃分析。","authors":"Yanni Liu, Cuixue Jiang, Guoyang Zhang, Xiuxia Wang, Ruke Sha, Mingyue Liu, Junyi Ma, Zhaohan Sun, Shuo Shen, Yujie Qiu, Shengdong Zhu, Guangbin Sun, Sen Xu, Meiyan Song","doi":"10.62347/XJDW3310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Temsirolimus and pazopanib serve as first-line therapies for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This meta-analysis was performed to assess and compare their efficacy, optimal treatment targets, and associated toxicities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases for relevant literature published from 2003 to 2023. Studies were selected based on specific exclusion criteria, and eligible articles were subjected to data extraction for subsequent subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies of moderate to high quality were included. In the low-risk group, the mortality rate was significantly lower in the temsirolimus group at 0.23 (95% Cl, 0.15-0.31) compared to 0.44 (95% Cl, 0.40-0.47) in the pazopanib group. In the high-risk group, the mortality rate was 0.73 (95% Cl, 0.69-0.76) for temsirolimus and 0.67 (95% Cl, 0.64-0.71) for pazopanib.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Temsirolimus demonstrated greater efficacy in the low-risk group, while pazopanib was superior in the high-risk group for the treatment of RCC. Consideration of both efficacy and toxicity is crucial to guide drug selection for patients. TRN: CRD42024578497 (Registration date: 2024/08/21).</p>","PeriodicalId":7438,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","volume":"13 4","pages":"272-283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of temsirolimus versus pazopanib in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yanni Liu, Cuixue Jiang, Guoyang Zhang, Xiuxia Wang, Ruke Sha, Mingyue Liu, Junyi Ma, Zhaohan Sun, Shuo Shen, Yujie Qiu, Shengdong Zhu, Guangbin Sun, Sen Xu, Meiyan Song\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/XJDW3310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Temsirolimus and pazopanib serve as first-line therapies for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This meta-analysis was performed to assess and compare their efficacy, optimal treatment targets, and associated toxicities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases for relevant literature published from 2003 to 2023. Studies were selected based on specific exclusion criteria, and eligible articles were subjected to data extraction for subsequent subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies of moderate to high quality were included. In the low-risk group, the mortality rate was significantly lower in the temsirolimus group at 0.23 (95% Cl, 0.15-0.31) compared to 0.44 (95% Cl, 0.40-0.47) in the pazopanib group. In the high-risk group, the mortality rate was 0.73 (95% Cl, 0.69-0.76) for temsirolimus and 0.67 (95% Cl, 0.64-0.71) for pazopanib.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Temsirolimus demonstrated greater efficacy in the low-risk group, while pazopanib was superior in the high-risk group for the treatment of RCC. Consideration of both efficacy and toxicity is crucial to guide drug selection for patients. TRN: CRD42024578497 (Registration date: 2024/08/21).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of clinical and experimental urology\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"272-283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444392/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of clinical and experimental urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/XJDW3310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/XJDW3310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:替西莫司和帕唑帕尼作为肾细胞癌(RCC)的一线治疗药物。本荟萃分析旨在评估和比较它们的疗效、最佳治疗靶点和相关毒性。方法:检索PubMed、CNKI、万方、VIP数据库2003 - 2023年发表的相关文献。根据特定的排除标准选择研究,并对符合条件的文章进行数据提取,用于随后的亚组分析。结果:纳入了14项中高质量的研究。在低危组中,坦西莫司组的死亡率为0.23 (95% Cl, 0.15-0.31),而帕唑帕尼组的死亡率为0.44 (95% Cl, 0.40-0.47)。在高危组,替西莫司的死亡率为0.73 (95% Cl, 0.69-0.76),帕唑帕尼的死亡率为0.67 (95% Cl, 0.64-0.71)。结论:替西莫司在低危组疗效更佳,帕唑帕尼在高危组疗效更佳。同时考虑疗效和毒性是指导患者选择药物的关键。TRN: CRD42024578497(注册日期:2024/08/21)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of temsirolimus versus pazopanib in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Purpose: Temsirolimus and pazopanib serve as first-line therapies for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This meta-analysis was performed to assess and compare their efficacy, optimal treatment targets, and associated toxicities.

Methods: We searched the PubMed, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases for relevant literature published from 2003 to 2023. Studies were selected based on specific exclusion criteria, and eligible articles were subjected to data extraction for subsequent subgroup analysis.

Results: Fourteen studies of moderate to high quality were included. In the low-risk group, the mortality rate was significantly lower in the temsirolimus group at 0.23 (95% Cl, 0.15-0.31) compared to 0.44 (95% Cl, 0.40-0.47) in the pazopanib group. In the high-risk group, the mortality rate was 0.73 (95% Cl, 0.69-0.76) for temsirolimus and 0.67 (95% Cl, 0.64-0.71) for pazopanib.

Conclusion: Temsirolimus demonstrated greater efficacy in the low-risk group, while pazopanib was superior in the high-risk group for the treatment of RCC. Consideration of both efficacy and toxicity is crucial to guide drug selection for patients. TRN: CRD42024578497 (Registration date: 2024/08/21).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信