Aya Gavish Moscovitz, , , Haneen Simaan Yameen, , , Orit Bar-Am, , and , Dror Seliktar*,
{"title":"评价三种常用光引发剂在不同细胞相容水凝胶平台上的交联效率和细胞相容性。","authors":"Aya Gavish Moscovitz, , , Haneen Simaan Yameen, , , Orit Bar-Am, , and , Dror Seliktar*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.biomac.5c01142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Biomedical hydrogels often use a photopolymerization strategy to cross-link the polymer network. There are only a few cyto-compatible photoinitiators (PIs) that are commonly used for cross-linking biomedical hydrogels, including Irgacure 2959, lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate (LAP), and Eosin Y. Herein, we tested these PIs to optimize the cross-linking efficiency while minimizing cell death. Testing was performed on three types of hydrogels, including a synthetic material (poly(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate, PEG-DA), a semisynthetic material, PEG-fibrinogen (PF), and a modified biological material, methacrylated fibrinogen (FibMA). The results showed that PI concentration and illumination intensity had a significant impact on cross-linking efficiency, as measured by the shear storage modulus, with each material demonstrating different responses to the photopolymerization parameters. Optimal photo-cross-linking conditions were not the same for the modified protein hydrogels as compared to synthetic and semisynthetic materials. These findings may have consequential implications when applying photopolymerization to cross-link various types of cell-compatible hydrogels for biomedical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":30,"journal":{"name":"Biomacromolecules","volume":"26 10","pages":"6817–6833"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.biomac.5c01142","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Cross-Linking Efficiency and Cytocompatibility of Three Commonly Used Photoinitiators across Different Cell-Compatible Hydrogel Platforms\",\"authors\":\"Aya Gavish Moscovitz, , , Haneen Simaan Yameen, , , Orit Bar-Am, , and , Dror Seliktar*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.biomac.5c01142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Biomedical hydrogels often use a photopolymerization strategy to cross-link the polymer network. There are only a few cyto-compatible photoinitiators (PIs) that are commonly used for cross-linking biomedical hydrogels, including Irgacure 2959, lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate (LAP), and Eosin Y. Herein, we tested these PIs to optimize the cross-linking efficiency while minimizing cell death. Testing was performed on three types of hydrogels, including a synthetic material (poly(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate, PEG-DA), a semisynthetic material, PEG-fibrinogen (PF), and a modified biological material, methacrylated fibrinogen (FibMA). The results showed that PI concentration and illumination intensity had a significant impact on cross-linking efficiency, as measured by the shear storage modulus, with each material demonstrating different responses to the photopolymerization parameters. Optimal photo-cross-linking conditions were not the same for the modified protein hydrogels as compared to synthetic and semisynthetic materials. These findings may have consequential implications when applying photopolymerization to cross-link various types of cell-compatible hydrogels for biomedical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomacromolecules\",\"volume\":\"26 10\",\"pages\":\"6817–6833\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.biomac.5c01142\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomacromolecules\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.biomac.5c01142\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomacromolecules","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.biomac.5c01142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating Cross-Linking Efficiency and Cytocompatibility of Three Commonly Used Photoinitiators across Different Cell-Compatible Hydrogel Platforms
Biomedical hydrogels often use a photopolymerization strategy to cross-link the polymer network. There are only a few cyto-compatible photoinitiators (PIs) that are commonly used for cross-linking biomedical hydrogels, including Irgacure 2959, lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate (LAP), and Eosin Y. Herein, we tested these PIs to optimize the cross-linking efficiency while minimizing cell death. Testing was performed on three types of hydrogels, including a synthetic material (poly(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate, PEG-DA), a semisynthetic material, PEG-fibrinogen (PF), and a modified biological material, methacrylated fibrinogen (FibMA). The results showed that PI concentration and illumination intensity had a significant impact on cross-linking efficiency, as measured by the shear storage modulus, with each material demonstrating different responses to the photopolymerization parameters. Optimal photo-cross-linking conditions were not the same for the modified protein hydrogels as compared to synthetic and semisynthetic materials. These findings may have consequential implications when applying photopolymerization to cross-link various types of cell-compatible hydrogels for biomedical applications.
期刊介绍:
Biomacromolecules is a leading forum for the dissemination of cutting-edge research at the interface of polymer science and biology. Submissions to Biomacromolecules should contain strong elements of innovation in terms of macromolecular design, synthesis and characterization, or in the application of polymer materials to biology and medicine.
Topics covered by Biomacromolecules include, but are not exclusively limited to: sustainable polymers, polymers based on natural and renewable resources, degradable polymers, polymer conjugates, polymeric drugs, polymers in biocatalysis, biomacromolecular assembly, biomimetic polymers, polymer-biomineral hybrids, biomimetic-polymer processing, polymer recycling, bioactive polymer surfaces, original polymer design for biomedical applications such as immunotherapy, drug delivery, gene delivery, antimicrobial applications, diagnostic imaging and biosensing, polymers in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, polymeric scaffolds and hydrogels for cell culture and delivery.