唐氏综合征和常染色体显性阿尔茨海默病的横断面FDG。

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Omar Abdelmoity, Julie K Wisch, James T Kennedy, Manu Goyal, Andrei Vlassenko, Shaney Flores, Benjamin L Handen, Elizabeth Head, David Keator, Michael S Rafii, Patrick Lao, Florence Lai, H Diana Rosas, Sigan L Hartley, Shahid Zaman, Adam M Brickman, Dana Tudorascu, Joseph H Lee, Ricardo Francisco Allegri, Sarah Keefe, Christian la Fougere, Jorge Llibre-Guerra, Takeshi Ikeuchi, John C Morris, Jee Hoon Roh, Gregory S Day, Johannes Levin, Peter R Schofield, Brian A Gordon, Tammie L S Benzinger, Beau M Ances
{"title":"唐氏综合征和常染色体显性阿尔茨海默病的横断面FDG。","authors":"Omar Abdelmoity, Julie K Wisch, James T Kennedy, Manu Goyal, Andrei Vlassenko, Shaney Flores, Benjamin L Handen, Elizabeth Head, David Keator, Michael S Rafii, Patrick Lao, Florence Lai, H Diana Rosas, Sigan L Hartley, Shahid Zaman, Adam M Brickman, Dana Tudorascu, Joseph H Lee, Ricardo Francisco Allegri, Sarah Keefe, Christian la Fougere, Jorge Llibre-Guerra, Takeshi Ikeuchi, John C Morris, Jee Hoon Roh, Gregory S Day, Johannes Levin, Peter R Schofield, Brian A Gordon, Tammie L S Benzinger, Beau M Ances","doi":"10.1002/ana.78002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Directly compare the brain glucose patterns seen with [F-18] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) between 2 genetically determined forms of Alzheimer's disease: Down syndrome (DS) and autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analyses of FDG were performed in individuals with DS (n = 76) from the Alzheimer Biomarker Consortium-Down Syndrome (ABC-DS), ADAD (n = 297), and neurotypical familial controls (n = 188) from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN). Within-group linear regression models and generalized additive models were performed for select regional FDG uptake measures (isthmus cingulate and inferior parietal, precuneus, middle temporal gyrus, and precentral gyrus). Age, sex, apolipoprotein (APOE) ε4 carrier status, and cortical amyloid burden were included within these analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Even 20 years before expected onset of clinical symptoms, FDG uptake was lower for DS compared to neurotypical familial controls (p < 0.01). ADAD baseline FDG was similar to neurotypical familial controls until 7 years before expected symptom onset. Both symptomatic individuals with DS and ADAD had lower FDG compared to neurotypical familial controls (p < 0.01). A higher amyloid burden was associated with lower FDG for both genetic forms, with similar rates of decline in FDG uptake for DS and ADAD who were amyloid positive.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Brain glucose metabolism is substantially lower for people with DS, even in individuals who are cognitively stable. The patterns of FDG decline are distinct in these 2 genetically determined forms of AD. The diagnostic utility of FDG-PET is specific to the genetic form of AD. ANN NEUROL 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":127,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Sectional FDG in Down Syndrome and Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer's Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Omar Abdelmoity, Julie K Wisch, James T Kennedy, Manu Goyal, Andrei Vlassenko, Shaney Flores, Benjamin L Handen, Elizabeth Head, David Keator, Michael S Rafii, Patrick Lao, Florence Lai, H Diana Rosas, Sigan L Hartley, Shahid Zaman, Adam M Brickman, Dana Tudorascu, Joseph H Lee, Ricardo Francisco Allegri, Sarah Keefe, Christian la Fougere, Jorge Llibre-Guerra, Takeshi Ikeuchi, John C Morris, Jee Hoon Roh, Gregory S Day, Johannes Levin, Peter R Schofield, Brian A Gordon, Tammie L S Benzinger, Beau M Ances\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ana.78002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Directly compare the brain glucose patterns seen with [F-18] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) between 2 genetically determined forms of Alzheimer's disease: Down syndrome (DS) and autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analyses of FDG were performed in individuals with DS (n = 76) from the Alzheimer Biomarker Consortium-Down Syndrome (ABC-DS), ADAD (n = 297), and neurotypical familial controls (n = 188) from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN). Within-group linear regression models and generalized additive models were performed for select regional FDG uptake measures (isthmus cingulate and inferior parietal, precuneus, middle temporal gyrus, and precentral gyrus). Age, sex, apolipoprotein (APOE) ε4 carrier status, and cortical amyloid burden were included within these analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Even 20 years before expected onset of clinical symptoms, FDG uptake was lower for DS compared to neurotypical familial controls (p < 0.01). ADAD baseline FDG was similar to neurotypical familial controls until 7 years before expected symptom onset. Both symptomatic individuals with DS and ADAD had lower FDG compared to neurotypical familial controls (p < 0.01). A higher amyloid burden was associated with lower FDG for both genetic forms, with similar rates of decline in FDG uptake for DS and ADAD who were amyloid positive.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Brain glucose metabolism is substantially lower for people with DS, even in individuals who are cognitively stable. The patterns of FDG decline are distinct in these 2 genetically determined forms of AD. The diagnostic utility of FDG-PET is specific to the genetic form of AD. ANN NEUROL 2025.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.78002\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.78002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:直接比较[F-18]氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)在两种遗传决定的阿尔茨海默病:唐氏综合征(DS)和常染色体显性阿尔茨海默病(ADAD)之间所看到的脑葡萄糖模式。方法:对来自阿尔茨海默生物标志物联盟-唐氏综合征(ABC-DS)的DS (n = 76)、ADAD (n = 297)和来自显性遗传阿尔茨海默网络(DIAN)的神经典型家族对照(n = 188)的个体进行FDG横断面分析。对部分区域FDG摄取测量(峡扣带和下顶叶、楔前叶、颞中回和中央前回)采用组内线性回归模型和广义加性模型。这些分析包括年龄、性别、载脂蛋白(APOE) ε4携带者状态和皮质淀粉样蛋白负荷。结果:即使在预期出现临床症状的20年前,与神经正常的家族对照相比,退行性痴呆患者的FDG摄取也较低(p)。解释:退行性痴呆患者的脑糖代谢明显较低,即使在认知稳定的个体中也是如此。在这两种由基因决定的AD形式中,FDG下降的模式是不同的。FDG-PET的诊断作用是针对AD的遗传形式。Ann neurol 2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-Sectional FDG in Down Syndrome and Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer's Disease.

Objectives: Directly compare the brain glucose patterns seen with [F-18] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) between 2 genetically determined forms of Alzheimer's disease: Down syndrome (DS) and autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD).

Methods: Cross-sectional analyses of FDG were performed in individuals with DS (n = 76) from the Alzheimer Biomarker Consortium-Down Syndrome (ABC-DS), ADAD (n = 297), and neurotypical familial controls (n = 188) from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN). Within-group linear regression models and generalized additive models were performed for select regional FDG uptake measures (isthmus cingulate and inferior parietal, precuneus, middle temporal gyrus, and precentral gyrus). Age, sex, apolipoprotein (APOE) ε4 carrier status, and cortical amyloid burden were included within these analyses.

Results: Even 20 years before expected onset of clinical symptoms, FDG uptake was lower for DS compared to neurotypical familial controls (p < 0.01). ADAD baseline FDG was similar to neurotypical familial controls until 7 years before expected symptom onset. Both symptomatic individuals with DS and ADAD had lower FDG compared to neurotypical familial controls (p < 0.01). A higher amyloid burden was associated with lower FDG for both genetic forms, with similar rates of decline in FDG uptake for DS and ADAD who were amyloid positive.

Interpretation: Brain glucose metabolism is substantially lower for people with DS, even in individuals who are cognitively stable. The patterns of FDG decline are distinct in these 2 genetically determined forms of AD. The diagnostic utility of FDG-PET is specific to the genetic form of AD. ANN NEUROL 2025.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Neurology
Annals of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
18.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
270
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Neurology publishes original articles with potential for high impact in understanding the pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and science underlying diseases of the human nervous system. Articles should ideally be of broad interest to the academic neurological community rather than solely to subspecialists in a particular field. Studies involving experimental model system, including those in cell and organ cultures and animals, of direct translational relevance to the understanding of neurological disease are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信