Awoke Mihretu, Abebaw Fekadu, Azeb Asaminew Alemu, Charlotte Hanlon
{"title":"低收入和中等收入国家严重精神卫生状况患者中伴发性物质使用障碍患者的社会心理干预措施:范围审查","authors":"Awoke Mihretu, Abebaw Fekadu, Azeb Asaminew Alemu, Charlotte Hanlon","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.10840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The high comorbidity of substance use disorders (SUDs) among people with severe mental health conditions (MHCs) poses major challenges to providing effective care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where treatment options are limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this scoping review was to produce an overview of the current evidence on psychosocial interventions for people with comorbid MHCs and SUDs in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The following databases were searched from their inception to 23 July 2024: PubMed/Medline, Global Health, Embase, PsycINFO and Global Index Medicus. We also searched for grey literature, using Google Scholar, ProQuest and Clinicaltrials.gov. Reporting was according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. Studies were eligible if they focused on any psychosocial intervention targeting substance use in people with severe MHCs from LMICs. Of the 6304 records screened by titles and abstracts, 138 full-text articles were assessed and included for data extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 6304 records screened by titles and abstracts, 138 full-text articles were assessed and 13 articles were included for data extraction. Many of the studies (<i>n</i> = 9) had a quasi-experimental design, and were from Latin America and South Asia. Four studies were randomised controlled trials. The primary outcomes examined were substance use abstinence, treatment engagement and retention, reduction in psychiatric symptoms, functioning and suicidal behaviours. Despite some heterogeneity in study designs, target populations and evaluated outcomes, interventions including various tobacco cessation programmes, screening and brief intervention with family support, and community-based programmes, have demonstrated positive outcomes in reducing tobacco, alcohol and khat use, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review shows that there have been few initiatives to design and test psychosocial interventions for individuals with comorbid severe MHCs and SUDs in LMICs. There is a clear need to design and test feasible, acceptable, and effective interventions to address both severe MHCs and substance use when they co-occur.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 5","pages":"e222"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychosocial interventions for people with comorbid substance use disorders in people with severe mental health conditions in low- and middle-income countries: scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Awoke Mihretu, Abebaw Fekadu, Azeb Asaminew Alemu, Charlotte Hanlon\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjo.2025.10840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The high comorbidity of substance use disorders (SUDs) among people with severe mental health conditions (MHCs) poses major challenges to providing effective care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where treatment options are limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this scoping review was to produce an overview of the current evidence on psychosocial interventions for people with comorbid MHCs and SUDs in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The following databases were searched from their inception to 23 July 2024: PubMed/Medline, Global Health, Embase, PsycINFO and Global Index Medicus. We also searched for grey literature, using Google Scholar, ProQuest and Clinicaltrials.gov. Reporting was according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. Studies were eligible if they focused on any psychosocial intervention targeting substance use in people with severe MHCs from LMICs. Of the 6304 records screened by titles and abstracts, 138 full-text articles were assessed and included for data extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 6304 records screened by titles and abstracts, 138 full-text articles were assessed and 13 articles were included for data extraction. Many of the studies (<i>n</i> = 9) had a quasi-experimental design, and were from Latin America and South Asia. Four studies were randomised controlled trials. The primary outcomes examined were substance use abstinence, treatment engagement and retention, reduction in psychiatric symptoms, functioning and suicidal behaviours. Despite some heterogeneity in study designs, target populations and evaluated outcomes, interventions including various tobacco cessation programmes, screening and brief intervention with family support, and community-based programmes, have demonstrated positive outcomes in reducing tobacco, alcohol and khat use, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review shows that there have been few initiatives to design and test psychosocial interventions for individuals with comorbid severe MHCs and SUDs in LMICs. There is a clear need to design and test feasible, acceptable, and effective interventions to address both severe MHCs and substance use when they co-occur.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"e222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458094/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10840\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10840","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:严重精神健康状况(MHCs)患者中物质使用障碍(sud)的高合并症对提供有效护理构成了重大挑战,特别是在治疗选择有限的低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。目的:本综述的目的是对中低收入国家mhc和sud合并症患者的社会心理干预的现有证据进行概述。方法:检索自建库至2024年7月23日的PubMed/Medline、Global Health、Embase、PsycINFO和Global Index Medicus数据库。我们还使用谷歌Scholar、ProQuest和Clinicaltrials.gov搜索灰色文献。报告按照系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价(PRISMA-ScR)清单的首选报告项目进行。如果研究集中于针对低收入中低收入严重MHCs患者药物使用的任何心理社会干预,则研究是合格的。在标题和摘要筛选的6304条记录中,评估并纳入138篇全文文章进行数据提取。结果:在标题和摘要筛选的6304篇记录中,评估了138篇全文文章,并纳入13篇文章进行数据提取。许多研究(n = 9)具有准实验设计,并且来自拉丁美洲和南亚。4项研究为随机对照试验。检查的主要结果是物质使用戒断,治疗参与和保留,精神症状减少,功能和自杀行为。尽管研究设计、目标人群和评估结果存在一些异质性,但干预措施,包括各种戒烟规划、家庭支持下的筛查和短暂干预以及基于社区的规划,分别在减少烟草、酒精和阿拉伯茶的使用方面显示出积极的结果。结论:该综述显示,对于中低收入国家中合并严重MHCs和sud的个体,设计和测试社会心理干预措施的举措很少。显然,有必要设计和测试可行、可接受和有效的干预措施,以解决严重mhc和同时发生的药物使用问题。
Psychosocial interventions for people with comorbid substance use disorders in people with severe mental health conditions in low- and middle-income countries: scoping review.
Background: The high comorbidity of substance use disorders (SUDs) among people with severe mental health conditions (MHCs) poses major challenges to providing effective care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where treatment options are limited.
Aims: The aim of this scoping review was to produce an overview of the current evidence on psychosocial interventions for people with comorbid MHCs and SUDs in LMICs.
Method: The following databases were searched from their inception to 23 July 2024: PubMed/Medline, Global Health, Embase, PsycINFO and Global Index Medicus. We also searched for grey literature, using Google Scholar, ProQuest and Clinicaltrials.gov. Reporting was according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. Studies were eligible if they focused on any psychosocial intervention targeting substance use in people with severe MHCs from LMICs. Of the 6304 records screened by titles and abstracts, 138 full-text articles were assessed and included for data extraction.
Results: Of the 6304 records screened by titles and abstracts, 138 full-text articles were assessed and 13 articles were included for data extraction. Many of the studies (n = 9) had a quasi-experimental design, and were from Latin America and South Asia. Four studies were randomised controlled trials. The primary outcomes examined were substance use abstinence, treatment engagement and retention, reduction in psychiatric symptoms, functioning and suicidal behaviours. Despite some heterogeneity in study designs, target populations and evaluated outcomes, interventions including various tobacco cessation programmes, screening and brief intervention with family support, and community-based programmes, have demonstrated positive outcomes in reducing tobacco, alcohol and khat use, respectively.
Conclusions: The review shows that there have been few initiatives to design and test psychosocial interventions for individuals with comorbid severe MHCs and SUDs in LMICs. There is a clear need to design and test feasible, acceptable, and effective interventions to address both severe MHCs and substance use when they co-occur.
期刊介绍:
Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.