对英国河流无脊椎动物种群的化学物质污染压力的评估。

IF 11.7 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Imogen P Poyntz-Wright, Xavier A Harrison, Charles R Tyler
{"title":"对英国河流无脊椎动物种群的化学物质污染压力的评估。","authors":"Imogen P Poyntz-Wright, Xavier A Harrison, Charles R Tyler","doi":"10.1111/brv.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally, rivers receive a diverse range of chemicals, including metals, pesticides, persistent organic pollutants, petrochemicals, human and veterinary pharmaceuticals and personal care products. However, the extent to which these different chemical groups affect riverine invertebrate communities is not well defined. Here we set out to evaluate the available evidence for associations between British riverine invertebrate communities and different chemical groups (and individual members of these chemical groups). Our assessment comprised three elements, (i) an evaluation of whether environmental concentrations of these chemicals exceed the lowest effect concentrations (ECs) based on laboratory tests, (ii) an assessment of associations between chemical groups and changes in British riverine invertebrate communities using the existing published literature, and (iii) calculated potential risk of toxicity of the chemical groups to invertebrates based on measured exposures (Environmental Agency monitoring data) and laboratory-based measurements of the lethal concentration required to kill half of the tested population (LC<sub>50</sub>). Our conclusions indicate that metal and pesticide pollutants (including the veterinary medicine fipronil) are of greatest concern for British riverine invertebrate communities. Petrochemicals were also of potential concern, however, risk calculations indicate this risk is lower than that for metals and pesticides. All other chemical groups assessed appeared to be of relatively low risk to British riverine invertebrates based on the available information. However, the concentrations of some pharmaceuticals and personal care products in British rivers exceeded the lowest ECs for some invertebrate species and require further investigation. Given the widespread concern regarding declines in freshwater invertebrates, studies on chemical impacts on invertebrate populations in British rivers are surprisingly limited and further targeted studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the pollution pressures posed by groups of chemicals on British riverine invertebrate populations.\",\"authors\":\"Imogen P Poyntz-Wright, Xavier A Harrison, Charles R Tyler\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/brv.70075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Globally, rivers receive a diverse range of chemicals, including metals, pesticides, persistent organic pollutants, petrochemicals, human and veterinary pharmaceuticals and personal care products. However, the extent to which these different chemical groups affect riverine invertebrate communities is not well defined. Here we set out to evaluate the available evidence for associations between British riverine invertebrate communities and different chemical groups (and individual members of these chemical groups). Our assessment comprised three elements, (i) an evaluation of whether environmental concentrations of these chemicals exceed the lowest effect concentrations (ECs) based on laboratory tests, (ii) an assessment of associations between chemical groups and changes in British riverine invertebrate communities using the existing published literature, and (iii) calculated potential risk of toxicity of the chemical groups to invertebrates based on measured exposures (Environmental Agency monitoring data) and laboratory-based measurements of the lethal concentration required to kill half of the tested population (LC<sub>50</sub>). Our conclusions indicate that metal and pesticide pollutants (including the veterinary medicine fipronil) are of greatest concern for British riverine invertebrate communities. Petrochemicals were also of potential concern, however, risk calculations indicate this risk is lower than that for metals and pesticides. All other chemical groups assessed appeared to be of relatively low risk to British riverine invertebrates based on the available information. However, the concentrations of some pharmaceuticals and personal care products in British rivers exceeded the lowest ECs for some invertebrate species and require further investigation. Given the widespread concern regarding declines in freshwater invertebrates, studies on chemical impacts on invertebrate populations in British rivers are surprisingly limited and further targeted studies are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70075\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70075","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,河流吸收了各种各样的化学物质,包括金属、农药、持久性有机污染物、石化产品、人类和兽药以及个人护理产品。然而,这些不同的化学基团对河流无脊椎动物群落的影响程度还没有得到很好的界定。在这里,我们开始评估英国河流无脊椎动物群落与不同化学群体(以及这些化学群体的个体成员)之间联系的现有证据。我们的评估包括三个要素,(i)根据实验室测试评估这些化学品的环境浓度是否超过最低影响浓度(ECs), (ii)利用现有已发表的文献评估化学类群与英国河流无脊椎动物群落变化之间的关系。(iii)根据测量的暴露量(环境局监测数据)和基于实验室的致死浓度(LC50)的测量,计算出化学类群对无脊椎动物的潜在毒性风险。我们的结论表明,金属和农药污染物(包括兽药氟虫腈)是英国河流无脊椎动物群落最关注的问题。石化产品也可能引起关注,但风险计算表明,这种风险低于金属和农药。根据现有信息,所有其他被评估的化学物质对英国河流无脊椎动物的风险似乎相对较低。然而,英国河流中一些药品和个人护理产品的浓度超过了一些无脊椎动物的最低ECs,这需要进一步调查。考虑到人们对淡水无脊椎动物数量下降的广泛关注,英国河流中化学物质对无脊椎动物种群影响的研究却令人惊讶地有限,进一步的有针对性的研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the pollution pressures posed by groups of chemicals on British riverine invertebrate populations.

Globally, rivers receive a diverse range of chemicals, including metals, pesticides, persistent organic pollutants, petrochemicals, human and veterinary pharmaceuticals and personal care products. However, the extent to which these different chemical groups affect riverine invertebrate communities is not well defined. Here we set out to evaluate the available evidence for associations between British riverine invertebrate communities and different chemical groups (and individual members of these chemical groups). Our assessment comprised three elements, (i) an evaluation of whether environmental concentrations of these chemicals exceed the lowest effect concentrations (ECs) based on laboratory tests, (ii) an assessment of associations between chemical groups and changes in British riverine invertebrate communities using the existing published literature, and (iii) calculated potential risk of toxicity of the chemical groups to invertebrates based on measured exposures (Environmental Agency monitoring data) and laboratory-based measurements of the lethal concentration required to kill half of the tested population (LC50). Our conclusions indicate that metal and pesticide pollutants (including the veterinary medicine fipronil) are of greatest concern for British riverine invertebrate communities. Petrochemicals were also of potential concern, however, risk calculations indicate this risk is lower than that for metals and pesticides. All other chemical groups assessed appeared to be of relatively low risk to British riverine invertebrates based on the available information. However, the concentrations of some pharmaceuticals and personal care products in British rivers exceeded the lowest ECs for some invertebrate species and require further investigation. Given the widespread concern regarding declines in freshwater invertebrates, studies on chemical impacts on invertebrate populations in British rivers are surprisingly limited and further targeted studies are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信