环丙酚和异丙酚全静脉麻醉对宫腔镜手术患者术后恢复质量的影响:一项随机非劣效性试验。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Drug Design, Development and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-09-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S543281
Huan Yang, Yan Yang, Yihao Huang, Tao Liu, Yiheng Wang
{"title":"环丙酚和异丙酚全静脉麻醉对宫腔镜手术患者术后恢复质量的影响:一项随机非劣效性试验。","authors":"Huan Yang, Yan Yang, Yihao Huang, Tao Liu, Yiheng Wang","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S543281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The 2,6-disubstituted alkylphenol ciprofol is a novel propofol analog for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. We aimed to compare the effects of ciprofol-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on postoperative recovery quality following hysteroscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this randomized non-inferiority trial, women scheduled for hysteroscopic surgery at a tertiary hospital were randomly assigned to the ciprofol or propofol groups. The patients were administered intravenous injections of ciprofol (0.4 mg/kg) or propofol (2.0 mg/kg) for anesthesia induction before a maintenance infusion at initial rates of 0.8 or 5.0 mg/kg/h, respectively. The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-15 scale (QoR-15) score at 24 h post-surgery, and a non-inferiority margin of -8 was assumed. The secondary outcomes included hemodynamic changes, time to consciousness loss and recovery, incidences of injection pain, body movement, intraoperative respiratory adverse events, and postoperative adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial included 120 participants (60 per group). The total QoR-15 score 24 h after surgery in the ciprofol group was comparable to that in the propofol group (median [interquartile range]: 113.5 [111.0, 117.0] vs 112.5 [108.0, 117.0]; median difference [95% confidence interval]: -1.0 [-3.0, 2.0]). There were no significant differences in the five QoR-15 dimensions between the groups. The mean arterial pressure and heart rate during anesthesia induction and surgery were significantly higher in the ciprofol group than in the propofol group, whereas the incidence of injection pain was lower. In addition, there were no significant between-group differences in the time to loss of consciousness or awakening, incidences of intraoperative hypoxemia or laryngospasm, or incidences of postoperative nausea, vomiting, headache, dizziness, and drowsiness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ciprofol is not inferior to propofol in terms of QoR score. Ciprofol administration is suitable for general anesthesia in female patients during hysteroscopic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"19 ","pages":"8415-8426"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Ciprofol-Based and Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery Quality in Patients Undergoing Hysteroscopic Surgery: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Huan Yang, Yan Yang, Yihao Huang, Tao Liu, Yiheng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DDDT.S543281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The 2,6-disubstituted alkylphenol ciprofol is a novel propofol analog for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. We aimed to compare the effects of ciprofol-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on postoperative recovery quality following hysteroscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this randomized non-inferiority trial, women scheduled for hysteroscopic surgery at a tertiary hospital were randomly assigned to the ciprofol or propofol groups. The patients were administered intravenous injections of ciprofol (0.4 mg/kg) or propofol (2.0 mg/kg) for anesthesia induction before a maintenance infusion at initial rates of 0.8 or 5.0 mg/kg/h, respectively. The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-15 scale (QoR-15) score at 24 h post-surgery, and a non-inferiority margin of -8 was assumed. The secondary outcomes included hemodynamic changes, time to consciousness loss and recovery, incidences of injection pain, body movement, intraoperative respiratory adverse events, and postoperative adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial included 120 participants (60 per group). The total QoR-15 score 24 h after surgery in the ciprofol group was comparable to that in the propofol group (median [interquartile range]: 113.5 [111.0, 117.0] vs 112.5 [108.0, 117.0]; median difference [95% confidence interval]: -1.0 [-3.0, 2.0]). There were no significant differences in the five QoR-15 dimensions between the groups. The mean arterial pressure and heart rate during anesthesia induction and surgery were significantly higher in the ciprofol group than in the propofol group, whereas the incidence of injection pain was lower. In addition, there were no significant between-group differences in the time to loss of consciousness or awakening, incidences of intraoperative hypoxemia or laryngospasm, or incidences of postoperative nausea, vomiting, headache, dizziness, and drowsiness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ciprofol is not inferior to propofol in terms of QoR score. Ciprofol administration is suitable for general anesthesia in female patients during hysteroscopic surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"8415-8426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449879/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S543281\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S543281","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:2,6-二取代烷基酚环丙酚是一种用于诱导和维持麻醉的新型异丙酚类似物。我们的目的是比较环丙酚和异丙酚全静脉麻醉(TIVA)对宫腔镜术后恢复质量的影响。患者和方法:在这项随机非劣效性试验中,计划在三级医院进行宫腔镜手术的妇女被随机分配到环丙酚组或异丙酚组。患者在维持输注前分别静脉注射环丙酚(0.4 mg/kg)或异丙酚(2.0 mg/kg)用于麻醉诱导,初始输注速率分别为0.8或5.0 mg/kg/h。主要终点是术后24小时的恢复质量-15量表(QoR-15)评分,假设非劣效裕度为-8。次要结局包括血流动力学改变、意识丧失和恢复的时间、注射疼痛的发生率、身体运动、术中呼吸不良事件和术后不良事件。结果:试验纳入120例受试者(每组60例)。环丙酚组术后24 h总QoR-15评分与异丙酚组相当(中位数[四分位数范围]:113.5 [111.0,117.0]vs 112.5[108.0, 117.0];中位数差异[95%可信区间]:-1.0[-3.0,2.0])。两组间QoR-15的5个维度无显著差异。麻醉诱导和手术过程中,环丙酚组的平均动脉压和心率明显高于异丙酚组,而注射疼痛发生率明显低于异丙酚组。此外,在意识丧失或觉醒的时间、术中低氧血症或喉痉挛的发生率、术后恶心、呕吐、头痛、头晕和嗜睡的发生率方面,组间无显著差异。结论:环丙酚的QoR评分不低于异丙酚。环丙酚适用于宫腔镜手术中女性患者全身麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Ciprofol-Based and Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery Quality in Patients Undergoing Hysteroscopic Surgery: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.

Comparison of Ciprofol-Based and Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery Quality in Patients Undergoing Hysteroscopic Surgery: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.

Comparison of Ciprofol-Based and Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery Quality in Patients Undergoing Hysteroscopic Surgery: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.

Comparison of Ciprofol-Based and Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery Quality in Patients Undergoing Hysteroscopic Surgery: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.

Purpose: The 2,6-disubstituted alkylphenol ciprofol is a novel propofol analog for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. We aimed to compare the effects of ciprofol-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on postoperative recovery quality following hysteroscopic surgery.

Patients and methods: In this randomized non-inferiority trial, women scheduled for hysteroscopic surgery at a tertiary hospital were randomly assigned to the ciprofol or propofol groups. The patients were administered intravenous injections of ciprofol (0.4 mg/kg) or propofol (2.0 mg/kg) for anesthesia induction before a maintenance infusion at initial rates of 0.8 or 5.0 mg/kg/h, respectively. The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-15 scale (QoR-15) score at 24 h post-surgery, and a non-inferiority margin of -8 was assumed. The secondary outcomes included hemodynamic changes, time to consciousness loss and recovery, incidences of injection pain, body movement, intraoperative respiratory adverse events, and postoperative adverse events.

Results: The trial included 120 participants (60 per group). The total QoR-15 score 24 h after surgery in the ciprofol group was comparable to that in the propofol group (median [interquartile range]: 113.5 [111.0, 117.0] vs 112.5 [108.0, 117.0]; median difference [95% confidence interval]: -1.0 [-3.0, 2.0]). There were no significant differences in the five QoR-15 dimensions between the groups. The mean arterial pressure and heart rate during anesthesia induction and surgery were significantly higher in the ciprofol group than in the propofol group, whereas the incidence of injection pain was lower. In addition, there were no significant between-group differences in the time to loss of consciousness or awakening, incidences of intraoperative hypoxemia or laryngospasm, or incidences of postoperative nausea, vomiting, headache, dizziness, and drowsiness.

Conclusion: Ciprofol is not inferior to propofol in terms of QoR score. Ciprofol administration is suitable for general anesthesia in female patients during hysteroscopic surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Drug Design, Development and Therapy CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
382
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas. Specific topics covered by the journal include: Drug target identification and validation Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery* Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes) Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes Fragment-based drug discovery Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products** Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing) Preclinical development studies Translational animal models Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways Toxicology Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics Clinical drug evaluation Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信