Chandrabose Selvaraj, William C Cho, Kulanthaivel Langeswaran, Abdulaziz S Alothaim, Rajendran Vijayakumar, Mani Jayaprakashvel, Deepali Desai
{"title":"癌症护理中的人工智能:在新出现的挑战和未来的机遇中革命性的诊断、治疗和精准医疗。","authors":"Chandrabose Selvaraj, William C Cho, Kulanthaivel Langeswaran, Abdulaziz S Alothaim, Rajendran Vijayakumar, Mani Jayaprakashvel, Deepali Desai","doi":"10.1007/s13205-025-04518-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in oncology to assist early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment planning, and drug discovery. A systematic review is required to integrate evidence across various AI applications in cancer treatment. Systematically assess the use of AI applications in oncology, integrate study findings, highlight methodological issues, and set directions for future research. According to PRISMA guidelines, we searched systematically PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore between January 2013 and December 2024. Search terms integrated AI-related terms with oncology-related terms. Peer-reviewed original research studies with the use of AI on cancer care in human or human-derived datasets were the eligible studies. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias with suitable tools. 120 out of 4852 records were included according to inclusion criteria. Applications fell into five clusters: imaging/radiomics, genomics/biomarker discovery, drug discovery/repurposing, clinical decision support, and patient monitoring. Convolutional neural networks were predominant in imaging tasks, whereas ML classifiers were prevalent in genomics. Most of the studies showed improved performance with respect to conventional methods although most of the studies failed to conduct multi-center validation. Heterogeneity of data, interpretability limitations, and integration problems were common issues. AI holds great potential along the cancer care continuum but is at risk of being threatened by issues with data quality, validation, interpretability, and translation to practice. Addressing these issues will require collaboration among disciplines, reporting to standardized guidelines, and large-scale validation studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7067,"journal":{"name":"3 Biotech","volume":"15 10","pages":"355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence in cancer care: revolutionizing diagnosis, treatment, and precision medicine amid emerging challenges and future opportunities.\",\"authors\":\"Chandrabose Selvaraj, William C Cho, Kulanthaivel Langeswaran, Abdulaziz S Alothaim, Rajendran Vijayakumar, Mani Jayaprakashvel, Deepali Desai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13205-025-04518-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in oncology to assist early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment planning, and drug discovery. A systematic review is required to integrate evidence across various AI applications in cancer treatment. Systematically assess the use of AI applications in oncology, integrate study findings, highlight methodological issues, and set directions for future research. According to PRISMA guidelines, we searched systematically PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore between January 2013 and December 2024. Search terms integrated AI-related terms with oncology-related terms. Peer-reviewed original research studies with the use of AI on cancer care in human or human-derived datasets were the eligible studies. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias with suitable tools. 120 out of 4852 records were included according to inclusion criteria. Applications fell into five clusters: imaging/radiomics, genomics/biomarker discovery, drug discovery/repurposing, clinical decision support, and patient monitoring. Convolutional neural networks were predominant in imaging tasks, whereas ML classifiers were prevalent in genomics. Most of the studies showed improved performance with respect to conventional methods although most of the studies failed to conduct multi-center validation. Heterogeneity of data, interpretability limitations, and integration problems were common issues. AI holds great potential along the cancer care continuum but is at risk of being threatened by issues with data quality, validation, interpretability, and translation to practice. Addressing these issues will require collaboration among disciplines, reporting to standardized guidelines, and large-scale validation studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"3 Biotech\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443665/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"3 Biotech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-025-04518-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3 Biotech","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-025-04518-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
人工智能(AI)越来越多地用于肿瘤学,以协助早期检测、诊断、预后、治疗计划和药物发现。需要进行系统审查,以整合各种人工智能在癌症治疗中的应用证据。系统评估人工智能在肿瘤学中的应用,整合研究结果,突出方法学问题,并为未来的研究设定方向。根据PRISMA指南,我们在2013年1月至2024年12月期间系统地检索了PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science和IEEE explore。搜索整合了人工智能相关术语和肿瘤学相关术语的术语。在人类或人类衍生数据集中使用人工智能进行癌症治疗的同行评审的原始研究是合格的研究。两名审稿人独立筛选研究,提取数据,并使用合适的工具评估偏倚风险。根据纳入标准,4852条记录中有120条被纳入。应用分为五类:成像/放射组学、基因组学/生物标志物发现、药物发现/再利用、临床决策支持和患者监测。卷积神经网络在成像任务中占主导地位,而ML分类器在基因组学中普遍存在。尽管大多数研究未能进行多中心验证,但大多数研究的性能优于传统方法。数据的异质性、可解释性限制和集成问题是常见的问题。人工智能在癌症治疗连续体中具有巨大潜力,但面临数据质量、验证、可解释性和实践翻译等问题的威胁。解决这些问题将需要各学科之间的合作,报告标准化的指导方针,以及大规模的验证研究。
Artificial intelligence in cancer care: revolutionizing diagnosis, treatment, and precision medicine amid emerging challenges and future opportunities.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in oncology to assist early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment planning, and drug discovery. A systematic review is required to integrate evidence across various AI applications in cancer treatment. Systematically assess the use of AI applications in oncology, integrate study findings, highlight methodological issues, and set directions for future research. According to PRISMA guidelines, we searched systematically PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore between January 2013 and December 2024. Search terms integrated AI-related terms with oncology-related terms. Peer-reviewed original research studies with the use of AI on cancer care in human or human-derived datasets were the eligible studies. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias with suitable tools. 120 out of 4852 records were included according to inclusion criteria. Applications fell into five clusters: imaging/radiomics, genomics/biomarker discovery, drug discovery/repurposing, clinical decision support, and patient monitoring. Convolutional neural networks were predominant in imaging tasks, whereas ML classifiers were prevalent in genomics. Most of the studies showed improved performance with respect to conventional methods although most of the studies failed to conduct multi-center validation. Heterogeneity of data, interpretability limitations, and integration problems were common issues. AI holds great potential along the cancer care continuum but is at risk of being threatened by issues with data quality, validation, interpretability, and translation to practice. Addressing these issues will require collaboration among disciplines, reporting to standardized guidelines, and large-scale validation studies.
3 BiotechAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
314
期刊介绍:
3 Biotech publishes the results of the latest research related to the study and application of biotechnology to:
- Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Agriculture
- The Environment
The focus on these three technology sectors recognizes that complete Biotechnology applications often require a combination of techniques. 3 Biotech not only presents the latest developments in biotechnology but also addresses the problems and benefits of integrating a variety of techniques for a particular application. 3 Biotech will appeal to scientists and engineers in both academia and industry focused on the safe and efficient application of Biotechnology to Medicine, Agriculture and the Environment.