由大树和地形异质性形成的林隙的尺度依赖性控制

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Jiale Chen, Tommaso Jucker, Xiaoran Wang, Fabian Jörg Fischer, Beibei Zhang, Zhaochen Zhang, Jianbo Hu, Qingsong Yang, Xihua Wang, Yu Liu, Minhua Zhang, Juyu Lian, Wanhui Ye, Buhang Li, Chengjin Chu, Xinlian Liang, Jian Zhang
{"title":"由大树和地形异质性形成的林隙的尺度依赖性控制","authors":"Jiale Chen,&nbsp;Tommaso Jucker,&nbsp;Xiaoran Wang,&nbsp;Fabian Jörg Fischer,&nbsp;Beibei Zhang,&nbsp;Zhaochen Zhang,&nbsp;Jianbo Hu,&nbsp;Qingsong Yang,&nbsp;Xihua Wang,&nbsp;Yu Liu,&nbsp;Minhua Zhang,&nbsp;Juyu Lian,&nbsp;Wanhui Ye,&nbsp;Buhang Li,&nbsp;Chengjin Chu,&nbsp;Xinlian Liang,&nbsp;Jian Zhang","doi":"10.1002/eap.70109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The size, number, and distribution of forest canopy gaps vary significantly across spatial scales, yet their relationships with underlying drivers, such as large trees, topography, and soil properties, remain insufficiently comprehended. We utilized an unmanned aerial vehicle to measure forest gap patterns (size, number, and aggregation) at seven spatial scales (20–400 m) in four subtropical forests and quantified the effect of large trees, topography, and soil in shaping gap patterns using ground inventory data. Gap size and aggregation showed significant variation across scales. Large trees and topographic complexity were major factors of gap patterns, with their effects depending on scale. Large trees in two forests had a significantly negative effect on gap size and density at the 20-m scale, but this effect was weaker and positive at the 100-m scale. Topography had the strongest effect on gap aggregation at a small scale (20 m) and on gap size and density at a larger scale (100 m). These results underscore the importance of spatial scale in understanding forest dynamics and highlight how community-level factors shape canopy structure. Identifying scale-dependent drivers of gap patterns can inform gap-based restoration and conservation strategies. Forest managers can reduce gap clustering by protecting large trees, especially in wind-prone areas, helping to maintain canopy structure, promote species diversity, and enhance ecosystem resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"35 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scale-dependent controls on forest gaps shaped by large trees and topographic heterogeneity\",\"authors\":\"Jiale Chen,&nbsp;Tommaso Jucker,&nbsp;Xiaoran Wang,&nbsp;Fabian Jörg Fischer,&nbsp;Beibei Zhang,&nbsp;Zhaochen Zhang,&nbsp;Jianbo Hu,&nbsp;Qingsong Yang,&nbsp;Xihua Wang,&nbsp;Yu Liu,&nbsp;Minhua Zhang,&nbsp;Juyu Lian,&nbsp;Wanhui Ye,&nbsp;Buhang Li,&nbsp;Chengjin Chu,&nbsp;Xinlian Liang,&nbsp;Jian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eap.70109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The size, number, and distribution of forest canopy gaps vary significantly across spatial scales, yet their relationships with underlying drivers, such as large trees, topography, and soil properties, remain insufficiently comprehended. We utilized an unmanned aerial vehicle to measure forest gap patterns (size, number, and aggregation) at seven spatial scales (20–400 m) in four subtropical forests and quantified the effect of large trees, topography, and soil in shaping gap patterns using ground inventory data. Gap size and aggregation showed significant variation across scales. Large trees and topographic complexity were major factors of gap patterns, with their effects depending on scale. Large trees in two forests had a significantly negative effect on gap size and density at the 20-m scale, but this effect was weaker and positive at the 100-m scale. Topography had the strongest effect on gap aggregation at a small scale (20 m) and on gap size and density at a larger scale (100 m). These results underscore the importance of spatial scale in understanding forest dynamics and highlight how community-level factors shape canopy structure. Identifying scale-dependent drivers of gap patterns can inform gap-based restoration and conservation strategies. Forest managers can reduce gap clustering by protecting large trees, especially in wind-prone areas, helping to maintain canopy structure, promote species diversity, and enhance ecosystem resilience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Applications\",\"volume\":\"35 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.70109\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.70109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

森林冠层间隙的大小、数量和分布在空间尺度上存在显著差异,但它们与潜在驱动因素(如大树、地形和土壤性质)的关系仍未得到充分了解。我们利用无人机在7个空间尺度(20-400 m)测量了4个亚热带森林的林隙格局(大小、数量和聚集),并利用地面清盘数据量化了大树、地形和土壤对林隙格局的影响。间隙大小和聚集度在不同尺度上存在显著差异。树木和地形复杂性是影响林隙格局的主要因素,其影响程度与尺度有关。两种林分大树对林隙大小和密度的影响在20 m尺度上呈显著负向影响,在100 m尺度上呈正向影响。地形对小尺度(20 m)林隙聚集的影响最大,对大尺度(100 m)林隙大小和密度的影响最大。这些结果强调了空间尺度对理解森林动态的重要性,并强调了群落水平因子如何影响冠层结构。确定间隙模式的尺度驱动因素可以为基于间隙的恢复和保护策略提供信息。森林管理者可以通过保护大树,特别是在风易发地区,帮助维持树冠结构,促进物种多样性,增强生态系统的恢复力,从而减少林隙聚集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Scale-dependent controls on forest gaps shaped by large trees and topographic heterogeneity

Scale-dependent controls on forest gaps shaped by large trees and topographic heterogeneity

Scale-dependent controls on forest gaps shaped by large trees and topographic heterogeneity

Scale-dependent controls on forest gaps shaped by large trees and topographic heterogeneity

The size, number, and distribution of forest canopy gaps vary significantly across spatial scales, yet their relationships with underlying drivers, such as large trees, topography, and soil properties, remain insufficiently comprehended. We utilized an unmanned aerial vehicle to measure forest gap patterns (size, number, and aggregation) at seven spatial scales (20–400 m) in four subtropical forests and quantified the effect of large trees, topography, and soil in shaping gap patterns using ground inventory data. Gap size and aggregation showed significant variation across scales. Large trees and topographic complexity were major factors of gap patterns, with their effects depending on scale. Large trees in two forests had a significantly negative effect on gap size and density at the 20-m scale, but this effect was weaker and positive at the 100-m scale. Topography had the strongest effect on gap aggregation at a small scale (20 m) and on gap size and density at a larger scale (100 m). These results underscore the importance of spatial scale in understanding forest dynamics and highlight how community-level factors shape canopy structure. Identifying scale-dependent drivers of gap patterns can inform gap-based restoration and conservation strategies. Forest managers can reduce gap clustering by protecting large trees, especially in wind-prone areas, helping to maintain canopy structure, promote species diversity, and enhance ecosystem resilience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信