{"title":"应对COVID-19和传统传染病的卫生支出公共管理:韩国经验","authors":"Seungwon Yu, Yeonwoo Sim, Namkuk Lee, Suhee Kim","doi":"10.1002/app5.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the effectiveness, allocative efficiency, and crowding-out effects of health expenditures in response to traditional infectious diseases and the COVID-19 pandemic. Through theoretical analysis and empirical data from Korean local governments, employing a two-way fixed effects model, we derive several key findings. First, social insurance health expenditures were significantly effective in controlling both traditional infectious diseases and COVID-19, whereas general government health expenditures were not. Second, allocative efficiency, the principle of allocating more resources where needed, was not observed in the response to traditional infectious diseases but was significant in the COVID-19 response. Third, we identified a crowding-out effect where increased health expenditures for COVID-19 reduced funds for traditional infectious disease responses. These findings offer strategic insights for Asia-Pacific countries in optimising health resource allocation and budget management amidst evolving health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":45839,"journal":{"name":"Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/app5.70049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Management of Health Expenditures in Response to COVID-19 and Traditional Infectious Diseases: The Korean Experience\",\"authors\":\"Seungwon Yu, Yeonwoo Sim, Namkuk Lee, Suhee Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/app5.70049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigates the effectiveness, allocative efficiency, and crowding-out effects of health expenditures in response to traditional infectious diseases and the COVID-19 pandemic. Through theoretical analysis and empirical data from Korean local governments, employing a two-way fixed effects model, we derive several key findings. First, social insurance health expenditures were significantly effective in controlling both traditional infectious diseases and COVID-19, whereas general government health expenditures were not. Second, allocative efficiency, the principle of allocating more resources where needed, was not observed in the response to traditional infectious diseases but was significant in the COVID-19 response. Third, we identified a crowding-out effect where increased health expenditures for COVID-19 reduced funds for traditional infectious disease responses. These findings offer strategic insights for Asia-Pacific countries in optimising health resource allocation and budget management amidst evolving health crises.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/app5.70049\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app5.70049\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app5.70049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Public Management of Health Expenditures in Response to COVID-19 and Traditional Infectious Diseases: The Korean Experience
This study investigates the effectiveness, allocative efficiency, and crowding-out effects of health expenditures in response to traditional infectious diseases and the COVID-19 pandemic. Through theoretical analysis and empirical data from Korean local governments, employing a two-way fixed effects model, we derive several key findings. First, social insurance health expenditures were significantly effective in controlling both traditional infectious diseases and COVID-19, whereas general government health expenditures were not. Second, allocative efficiency, the principle of allocating more resources where needed, was not observed in the response to traditional infectious diseases but was significant in the COVID-19 response. Third, we identified a crowding-out effect where increased health expenditures for COVID-19 reduced funds for traditional infectious disease responses. These findings offer strategic insights for Asia-Pacific countries in optimising health resource allocation and budget management amidst evolving health crises.
期刊介绍:
Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies is the flagship journal of the Crawford School of Public Policy at The Australian National University. It is a peer-reviewed journal that targets research in policy studies in Australia, Asia and the Pacific, across a discipline focus that includes economics, political science, governance, development and the environment. Specific themes of recent interest include health and education, aid, migration, inequality, poverty reduction, energy, climate and the environment, food policy, public administration, the role of the private sector in public policy, trade, foreign policy, natural resource management and development policy. Papers on a range of topics that speak to various disciplines, the region and policy makers are encouraged. The goal of the journal is to break down barriers across disciplines, and generate policy impact. Submissions will be reviewed on the basis of content, policy relevance and readability.