人类世概念的演变:对Zalasiewicz等人的回答。

IF 8.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Earths Future Pub Date : 2025-09-22 DOI:10.1029/2025EF006882
Matthew Edgeworth, Andrew M. Bauer, Erle C. Ellis, Stanley C. Finney, Philip L. Gibbard, Mark Maslin, Dorothy J. Merritts, Michael J. C. Walker
{"title":"人类世概念的演变:对Zalasiewicz等人的回答。","authors":"Matthew Edgeworth,&nbsp;Andrew M. Bauer,&nbsp;Erle C. Ellis,&nbsp;Stanley C. Finney,&nbsp;Philip L. Gibbard,&nbsp;Mark Maslin,&nbsp;Dorothy J. Merritts,&nbsp;Michael J. C. Walker","doi":"10.1029/2025EF006882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The claim that the Anthropocene is de facto a new epoch is disputed, along with the suggestion that Earth system transformation from one state to another can be pinned down to a single year. The epoch proposal was formally rejected in 2024 but, crucially, that was not a rejection of the Anthropocene itself. As the material event of human-induced planetary transformation continues to unfold at increasing rates all about us, research into the Anthropocene is as vital and relevant as ever. It is important to realize, however, that the concept of the Anthropocene is evolving. The long-standing assumption that it must be a time interval, and must therefore be accorded a precisely-defined date of start, is being called into question. The interdisciplinary field of Anthropocene research is straining to break free from the confines of rigid definitions and the imposition of an isochronous timeline to mark the supposed start, which cuts out vast amounts of relevant pre-1952 evidence from consideration. A broader, more flexible and less exclusive definition of the Anthropocene is in order. In this reply we respond to criticisms by epoch proponents and further outline the Anthropocene as an unfolding event of major significance in Earth history.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025EF006882","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolving Concept of the Anthropocene: A Reply to Zalasiewicz et al.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Edgeworth,&nbsp;Andrew M. Bauer,&nbsp;Erle C. Ellis,&nbsp;Stanley C. Finney,&nbsp;Philip L. Gibbard,&nbsp;Mark Maslin,&nbsp;Dorothy J. Merritts,&nbsp;Michael J. C. Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2025EF006882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The claim that the Anthropocene is de facto a new epoch is disputed, along with the suggestion that Earth system transformation from one state to another can be pinned down to a single year. The epoch proposal was formally rejected in 2024 but, crucially, that was not a rejection of the Anthropocene itself. As the material event of human-induced planetary transformation continues to unfold at increasing rates all about us, research into the Anthropocene is as vital and relevant as ever. It is important to realize, however, that the concept of the Anthropocene is evolving. The long-standing assumption that it must be a time interval, and must therefore be accorded a precisely-defined date of start, is being called into question. The interdisciplinary field of Anthropocene research is straining to break free from the confines of rigid definitions and the imposition of an isochronous timeline to mark the supposed start, which cuts out vast amounts of relevant pre-1952 evidence from consideration. A broader, more flexible and less exclusive definition of the Anthropocene is in order. In this reply we respond to criticisms by epoch proponents and further outline the Anthropocene as an unfolding event of major significance in Earth history.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earths Future\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025EF006882\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earths Future\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025EF006882\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025EF006882","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类世实际上是一个新纪元的说法,以及地球系统从一种状态到另一种状态的转变可以用一年时间来确定的说法,都存在争议。这个时代的提议在2024年被正式否决,但关键的是,这并不是对人类世本身的否决。随着人类引起的行星转变的物质事件继续以越来越快的速度在我们周围展开,对人类世的研究一如既往地至关重要和相关。然而,重要的是要认识到,人类世的概念是不断发展的。长期以来的假设,即它必须是一个时间间隔,因此必须给予一个精确界定的开始日期,现在正受到质疑。人类世研究的跨学科领域正在努力摆脱严格定义的限制,以及用等时时间线来标记所谓的开始,这将大量1952年之前的相关证据从考虑中剔除。一个更广泛、更灵活、不那么排他性的人类世定义是需要的。在这篇回复中,我们回应了时代支持者的批评,并进一步概述了人类世是地球历史上具有重大意义的一个正在展开的事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Evolving Concept of the Anthropocene: A Reply to Zalasiewicz et al.

The Evolving Concept of the Anthropocene: A Reply to Zalasiewicz et al.

The Evolving Concept of the Anthropocene: A Reply to Zalasiewicz et al.

The Evolving Concept of the Anthropocene: A Reply to Zalasiewicz et al.

The claim that the Anthropocene is de facto a new epoch is disputed, along with the suggestion that Earth system transformation from one state to another can be pinned down to a single year. The epoch proposal was formally rejected in 2024 but, crucially, that was not a rejection of the Anthropocene itself. As the material event of human-induced planetary transformation continues to unfold at increasing rates all about us, research into the Anthropocene is as vital and relevant as ever. It is important to realize, however, that the concept of the Anthropocene is evolving. The long-standing assumption that it must be a time interval, and must therefore be accorded a precisely-defined date of start, is being called into question. The interdisciplinary field of Anthropocene research is straining to break free from the confines of rigid definitions and the imposition of an isochronous timeline to mark the supposed start, which cuts out vast amounts of relevant pre-1952 evidence from consideration. A broader, more flexible and less exclusive definition of the Anthropocene is in order. In this reply we respond to criticisms by epoch proponents and further outline the Anthropocene as an unfolding event of major significance in Earth history.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earths Future
Earths Future ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
260
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信