休闲屏幕时间与六种神经发育障碍的风险:一项两样本孟德尔随机研究

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Chen Cai, Qimei Ran, Ming Lu, Chao Song, Zhongquan Jiang
{"title":"休闲屏幕时间与六种神经发育障碍的风险:一项两样本孟德尔随机研究","authors":"Chen Cai,&nbsp;Qimei Ran,&nbsp;Ming Lu,&nbsp;Chao Song,&nbsp;Zhongquan Jiang","doi":"10.1002/brb3.70884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs)—including autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), intellectual disability, learning disability, speech disorder, and Tourette disorder—impact brain development and impair social, learning, and occupational functioning. We performed a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using summary data from global genome-wide association studies to investigate the potential causal relationship between leisure screen time (LST) and NDDs risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Our dataset comprised 703,901 participants of European ancestry from 51 studies, with 256,725 individuals in the LST-valid sample. We investigated causal associations with six types of NDDs using five MR methods: inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode. IVW was the primary method due to its efficiency and precision. Heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were assessed using IVW and MR Egger, while the other methods served as sensitivity analyses to confirm robustness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The IVW method revealed that each standard deviation increase in LST was associated with a reduced risk of ADHD (OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.52–0.89) and an elevated risk of intellectual disability (OR = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.26–2.18). These associations were consistent with the weighted median analysis (ADHD: OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47–0.98; intellectual disability: OR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.06–2.14).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest that genetic predisposition to increased LST is causally associated with a lower risk of ADHD but a higher risk of intellectual disability, with no evidence for a causal relatawdionship with the other four NDDs. Larger or longitudinal studies are needed for further validation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9081,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Behavior","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70884","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leisure Screen Time and the Risk of Six Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study\",\"authors\":\"Chen Cai,&nbsp;Qimei Ran,&nbsp;Ming Lu,&nbsp;Chao Song,&nbsp;Zhongquan Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/brb3.70884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs)—including autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), intellectual disability, learning disability, speech disorder, and Tourette disorder—impact brain development and impair social, learning, and occupational functioning. We performed a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using summary data from global genome-wide association studies to investigate the potential causal relationship between leisure screen time (LST) and NDDs risk.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our dataset comprised 703,901 participants of European ancestry from 51 studies, with 256,725 individuals in the LST-valid sample. We investigated causal associations with six types of NDDs using five MR methods: inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode. IVW was the primary method due to its efficiency and precision. Heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were assessed using IVW and MR Egger, while the other methods served as sensitivity analyses to confirm robustness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The IVW method revealed that each standard deviation increase in LST was associated with a reduced risk of ADHD (OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.52–0.89) and an elevated risk of intellectual disability (OR = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.26–2.18). These associations were consistent with the weighted median analysis (ADHD: OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47–0.98; intellectual disability: OR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.06–2.14).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings suggest that genetic predisposition to increased LST is causally associated with a lower risk of ADHD but a higher risk of intellectual disability, with no evidence for a causal relatawdionship with the other four NDDs. Larger or longitudinal studies are needed for further validation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70884\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70884\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70884","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经发育障碍(ndd)——包括自闭症谱系障碍、注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)、智力障碍、学习障碍、语言障碍和图雷特障碍——影响大脑发育并损害社交、学习和职业功能。我们使用来自全球全基因组关联研究的汇总数据进行了孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,以调查休闲屏幕时间(LST)与ndd风险之间的潜在因果关系。我们的数据集包括来自51项研究的703,901名欧洲血统的参与者,其中lst有效样本为256,725人。我们使用五种MR方法调查了六种ndd类型的因果关系:逆方差加权(IVW)、MR Egger、加权中位数、简单模式和加权模式。IVW因其效率高、精度好而成为首选方法。使用IVW和MR Egger评估异质性和水平多效性,而其他方法作为敏感性分析以确认稳健性。结果IVW方法显示,LST每增加一个标准差与ADHD风险降低(OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.52-0.89)和智力残疾风险升高(OR = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.26-2.18)相关。这些关联与加权中位数分析一致(ADHD: OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47-0.98;智力残疾:OR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.06-2.14)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,LST升高的遗传易感性与ADHD的低风险有因果关系,但与智力残疾的高风险有因果关系,而与其他四种ndd没有因果关系。需要更大规模或纵向的研究来进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Leisure Screen Time and the Risk of Six Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

Leisure Screen Time and the Risk of Six Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

Background

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs)—including autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), intellectual disability, learning disability, speech disorder, and Tourette disorder—impact brain development and impair social, learning, and occupational functioning. We performed a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using summary data from global genome-wide association studies to investigate the potential causal relationship between leisure screen time (LST) and NDDs risk.

Methods

Our dataset comprised 703,901 participants of European ancestry from 51 studies, with 256,725 individuals in the LST-valid sample. We investigated causal associations with six types of NDDs using five MR methods: inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode. IVW was the primary method due to its efficiency and precision. Heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were assessed using IVW and MR Egger, while the other methods served as sensitivity analyses to confirm robustness.

Results

The IVW method revealed that each standard deviation increase in LST was associated with a reduced risk of ADHD (OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.52–0.89) and an elevated risk of intellectual disability (OR = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.26–2.18). These associations were consistent with the weighted median analysis (ADHD: OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47–0.98; intellectual disability: OR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.06–2.14).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that genetic predisposition to increased LST is causally associated with a lower risk of ADHD but a higher risk of intellectual disability, with no evidence for a causal relatawdionship with the other four NDDs. Larger or longitudinal studies are needed for further validation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain and Behavior
Brain and Behavior BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
352
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain and Behavior is supported by other journals published by Wiley, including a number of society-owned journals. The journals listed below support Brain and Behavior and participate in the Manuscript Transfer Program by referring articles of suitable quality and offering authors the option to have their paper, with any peer review reports, automatically transferred to Brain and Behavior. * [Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica](https://publons.com/journal/1366/acta-psychiatrica-scandinavica) * [Addiction Biology](https://publons.com/journal/1523/addiction-biology) * [Aggressive Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/3611/aggressive-behavior) * [Brain Pathology](https://publons.com/journal/1787/brain-pathology) * [Child: Care, Health and Development](https://publons.com/journal/6111/child-care-health-and-development) * [Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health](https://publons.com/journal/3839/criminal-behaviour-and-mental-health) * [Depression and Anxiety](https://publons.com/journal/1528/depression-and-anxiety) * Developmental Neurobiology * [Developmental Science](https://publons.com/journal/1069/developmental-science) * [European Journal of Neuroscience](https://publons.com/journal/1441/european-journal-of-neuroscience) * [Genes, Brain and Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1635/genes-brain-and-behavior) * [GLIA](https://publons.com/journal/1287/glia) * [Hippocampus](https://publons.com/journal/1056/hippocampus) * [Human Brain Mapping](https://publons.com/journal/500/human-brain-mapping) * [Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour](https://publons.com/journal/7330/journal-for-the-theory-of-social-behaviour) * [Journal of Comparative Neurology](https://publons.com/journal/1306/journal-of-comparative-neurology) * [Journal of Neuroimaging](https://publons.com/journal/6379/journal-of-neuroimaging) * [Journal of Neuroscience Research](https://publons.com/journal/2778/journal-of-neuroscience-research) * [Journal of Organizational Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1123/journal-of-organizational-behavior) * [Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System](https://publons.com/journal/3929/journal-of-the-peripheral-nervous-system) * [Muscle & Nerve](https://publons.com/journal/4448/muscle-and-nerve) * [Neural Pathology and Applied Neurobiology](https://publons.com/journal/2401/neuropathology-and-applied-neurobiology)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信