基于随机中心效应的协变量自适应随机化推理

IF 1.8 3区 生物学 Q4 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Anjali Pandey, Harsha Shree BS, Andrea Callegaro
{"title":"基于随机中心效应的协变量自适应随机化推理","authors":"Anjali Pandey,&nbsp;Harsha Shree BS,&nbsp;Andrea Callegaro","doi":"10.1002/bimj.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The minimization method is a popular choice for covariate-adaptive randomization in multicenter trials. Existing literature suggests that the type-I error is controlled if minimization variables are included in the statistical analysis. However, in practice, minimization variables with many categories, such as the recruitment center, are often not included in the model. In this paper, we propose including the minimization variable “center” as a random effect and assess its performance using simulations for Gaussian, binary, and Poisson endpoint variables. Our simulation study suggests that the random-effect model controls type-I error and preserves maximum power for all three endpoints under varied clinical trial settings. This approach offers an alternative to the re-randomization test, which regulatory authorities often suggest for sensitivity analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55360,"journal":{"name":"Biometrical Journal","volume":"67 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inference Under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization Using Random Center-Effect\",\"authors\":\"Anjali Pandey,&nbsp;Harsha Shree BS,&nbsp;Andrea Callegaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bimj.70076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The minimization method is a popular choice for covariate-adaptive randomization in multicenter trials. Existing literature suggests that the type-I error is controlled if minimization variables are included in the statistical analysis. However, in practice, minimization variables with many categories, such as the recruitment center, are often not included in the model. In this paper, we propose including the minimization variable “center” as a random effect and assess its performance using simulations for Gaussian, binary, and Poisson endpoint variables. Our simulation study suggests that the random-effect model controls type-I error and preserves maximum power for all three endpoints under varied clinical trial settings. This approach offers an alternative to the re-randomization test, which regulatory authorities often suggest for sensitivity analysis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biometrical Journal\",\"volume\":\"67 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biometrical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.70076\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.70076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最小化方法是多中心试验中协变量自适应随机化的常用方法。现有文献表明,如果在统计分析中加入最小化变量,则可以控制i型误差。然而,在实践中,具有许多类别的最小化变量,例如招聘中心,通常不包括在模型中。在本文中,我们建议将最小化变量“中心”作为随机效应,并通过模拟高斯、二进制和泊松端点变量来评估其性能。我们的模拟研究表明,随机效应模型控制了i型误差,并在不同的临床试验设置下保留了所有三个终点的最大功率。这种方法提供了一种替代的再随机化试验,这是监管机构经常建议敏感性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inference Under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization Using Random Center-Effect

The minimization method is a popular choice for covariate-adaptive randomization in multicenter trials. Existing literature suggests that the type-I error is controlled if minimization variables are included in the statistical analysis. However, in practice, minimization variables with many categories, such as the recruitment center, are often not included in the model. In this paper, we propose including the minimization variable “center” as a random effect and assess its performance using simulations for Gaussian, binary, and Poisson endpoint variables. Our simulation study suggests that the random-effect model controls type-I error and preserves maximum power for all three endpoints under varied clinical trial settings. This approach offers an alternative to the re-randomization test, which regulatory authorities often suggest for sensitivity analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biometrical Journal
Biometrical Journal 生物-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biometrical Journal publishes papers on statistical methods and their applications in life sciences including medicine, environmental sciences and agriculture. Methodological developments should be motivated by an interesting and relevant problem from these areas. Ideally the manuscript should include a description of the problem and a section detailing the application of the new methodology to the problem. Case studies, review articles and letters to the editors are also welcome. Papers containing only extensive mathematical theory are not suitable for publication in Biometrical Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信