利用人工智能模型推进飓风预报的路径和强度预测

IF 4.6 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Kumar Ankur, Sujit Roy, Christopher E. Phillips, Udaysankar Nair, Manil Maskey, Rahul Ramachandran
{"title":"利用人工智能模型推进飓风预报的路径和强度预测","authors":"Kumar Ankur,&nbsp;Sujit Roy,&nbsp;Christopher E. Phillips,&nbsp;Udaysankar Nair,&nbsp;Manil Maskey,&nbsp;Rahul Ramachandran","doi":"10.1029/2024MS004822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hurricane forecasting has traditionally relied on numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. However, advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) offer new opportunities to improve forecasting accuracy. This study presents a novel evaluation of the FourCastNet model, trained on MERRA-2 and ERA5 data sets. We perform a comprehensive comparison between the FourCastNet model forecasts and those simulated by the Weather Research and Forecating (WRF) model, a NWP model, assessing both the accuracy and radial distribution of hurricane structure. This comparison provides their representation of hurricane dynamics, including differences in track prediction and intensity forecasts. Additionally, the study addresses the challenge of bias in hurricane intensity forecasts. To overcome this, this study presents a comprehensive assessment of three hurricane intensity estimation models, HxUnet, HxCNN, and HxGNN. Our results demonstrate that HxUnet consistently outperforms the other models, achieving up to a 79% reduction in maximum sustained wind speed errors and a 59% reduction in Mean Sea Level Pressure errors. This significant improvement underscores the potential of AI models to enhance the precision of hurricane intensity forecasts. This research advances the application of AI in meteorology and establishes a foundation for future studies aimed at improving hurricane prediction and mitigation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":14881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024MS004822","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing Hurricane Forecasting With AI Models for Track and Intensity Prediction\",\"authors\":\"Kumar Ankur,&nbsp;Sujit Roy,&nbsp;Christopher E. Phillips,&nbsp;Udaysankar Nair,&nbsp;Manil Maskey,&nbsp;Rahul Ramachandran\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024MS004822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Hurricane forecasting has traditionally relied on numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. However, advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) offer new opportunities to improve forecasting accuracy. This study presents a novel evaluation of the FourCastNet model, trained on MERRA-2 and ERA5 data sets. We perform a comprehensive comparison between the FourCastNet model forecasts and those simulated by the Weather Research and Forecating (WRF) model, a NWP model, assessing both the accuracy and radial distribution of hurricane structure. This comparison provides their representation of hurricane dynamics, including differences in track prediction and intensity forecasts. Additionally, the study addresses the challenge of bias in hurricane intensity forecasts. To overcome this, this study presents a comprehensive assessment of three hurricane intensity estimation models, HxUnet, HxCNN, and HxGNN. Our results demonstrate that HxUnet consistently outperforms the other models, achieving up to a 79% reduction in maximum sustained wind speed errors and a 59% reduction in Mean Sea Level Pressure errors. This significant improvement underscores the potential of AI models to enhance the precision of hurricane intensity forecasts. This research advances the application of AI in meteorology and establishes a foundation for future studies aimed at improving hurricane prediction and mitigation efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems\",\"volume\":\"17 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024MS004822\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024MS004822\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024MS004822","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

飓风预报传统上依赖于数值天气预报(NWP)模式。然而,人工智能(AI)的进步为提高预测准确性提供了新的机会。本研究提出了一种基于MERRA-2和ERA5数据集的FourCastNet模型的新评估方法。我们对FourCastNet模式预报和天气研究与预报(WRF)模式(NWP模式)模拟的结果进行了全面比较,评估了飓风结构的准确性和径向分布。这种比较提供了它们对飓风动力学的表现,包括在路径预测和强度预测方面的差异。此外,该研究还解决了飓风强度预测存在偏差的问题。为了克服这一问题,本研究对HxUnet、HxCNN和HxGNN三种飓风强度估计模型进行了综合评估。我们的结果表明,HxUnet始终优于其他模型,最大持续风速误差减少了79%,平均海平面压力误差减少了59%。这一重大改进凸显了人工智能模型在提高飓风强度预测精度方面的潜力。这项研究推进了人工智能在气象学中的应用,并为旨在改进飓风预测和减灾工作的未来研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Advancing Hurricane Forecasting With AI Models for Track and Intensity Prediction

Advancing Hurricane Forecasting With AI Models for Track and Intensity Prediction

Advancing Hurricane Forecasting With AI Models for Track and Intensity Prediction

Advancing Hurricane Forecasting With AI Models for Track and Intensity Prediction

Hurricane forecasting has traditionally relied on numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. However, advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) offer new opportunities to improve forecasting accuracy. This study presents a novel evaluation of the FourCastNet model, trained on MERRA-2 and ERA5 data sets. We perform a comprehensive comparison between the FourCastNet model forecasts and those simulated by the Weather Research and Forecating (WRF) model, a NWP model, assessing both the accuracy and radial distribution of hurricane structure. This comparison provides their representation of hurricane dynamics, including differences in track prediction and intensity forecasts. Additionally, the study addresses the challenge of bias in hurricane intensity forecasts. To overcome this, this study presents a comprehensive assessment of three hurricane intensity estimation models, HxUnet, HxCNN, and HxGNN. Our results demonstrate that HxUnet consistently outperforms the other models, achieving up to a 79% reduction in maximum sustained wind speed errors and a 59% reduction in Mean Sea Level Pressure errors. This significant improvement underscores the potential of AI models to enhance the precision of hurricane intensity forecasts. This research advances the application of AI in meteorology and establishes a foundation for future studies aimed at improving hurricane prediction and mitigation efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
241
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES) is committed to advancing the science of Earth systems modeling by offering high-quality scientific research through online availability and open access licensing. JAMES invites authors and readers from the international Earth systems modeling community. Open access. Articles are available free of charge for everyone with Internet access to view and download. Formal peer review. Supplemental material, such as code samples, images, and visualizations, is published at no additional charge. No additional charge for color figures. Modest page charges to cover production costs. Articles published in high-quality full text PDF, HTML, and XML. Internal and external reference linking, DOI registration, and forward linking via CrossRef.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信