视觉刺激复杂性和语义内容对视听联想等价学习的共同影响

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Kálmán Tót, Noémi Harcsa-Pintér, Adél Papp, Balázs Bodosi, Attila Nagy, Gabriella Eördegh
{"title":"视觉刺激复杂性和语义内容对视听联想等价学习的共同影响","authors":"Kálmán Tót,&nbsp;Noémi Harcsa-Pintér,&nbsp;Adél Papp,&nbsp;Balázs Bodosi,&nbsp;Attila Nagy,&nbsp;Gabriella Eördegh","doi":"10.1002/brb3.70902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The Rutgers Acquired Equivalence Test (RAET) is an associative learning task that requires participants to learn pairs of visual stimuli and then recall and generalize these associations. To further explore this cognitive task, we developed three audiovisual learning tests with the same structure as the original RAET.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Each audiovisual test applied the same four distinct auditory antecedents but differed in visual consequents in complexity and semantic content, that is, cartoon faces (SoundFace), colored fish (SoundFish), and geometric shapes (SoundPolygon), respectively. The present study investigated the effect of these different visual stimuli on performance in audiovisual associative equivalence learning. Learning performance was assessed across three phases: acquisition, retrieval, and generalization. A total of 52 participants (25 females, 27 males, mean age = 25.88 ± 10.28 years) completed the tasks. Statistical analyses, including Friedman's ANOVA and Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests with Bonferroni correction, were applied to evaluate differences in performance across the tests.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants consistently performed significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) better and responded faster in learning, retrieval, and generalization phases of the SoundFace test compared to the SoundFish and SoundPolygon tests, which did not significantly differ from each other. Additionally, a semantic association task confirmed that face and fish stimuli were significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) richer in semantic content than polygons, yet only face stimuli significantly facilitated audiovisual learning outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These results suggest that the semantic content of visual stimuli—which could influence their verbalizability—is not sufficient on its own to enhance performance in audiovisual associative learning. Additionally, the number and variety of different features in visual stimulus sets (such as faces, fish, or polygons) may also significantly influence performance in audiovisual equivalence learning.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9081,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Behavior","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70902","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Combined Effect of Visual Stimulus Complexity and Semantic Content on Audiovisual Associative Equivalence Learning\",\"authors\":\"Kálmán Tót,&nbsp;Noémi Harcsa-Pintér,&nbsp;Adél Papp,&nbsp;Balázs Bodosi,&nbsp;Attila Nagy,&nbsp;Gabriella Eördegh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/brb3.70902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Rutgers Acquired Equivalence Test (RAET) is an associative learning task that requires participants to learn pairs of visual stimuli and then recall and generalize these associations. To further explore this cognitive task, we developed three audiovisual learning tests with the same structure as the original RAET.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Each audiovisual test applied the same four distinct auditory antecedents but differed in visual consequents in complexity and semantic content, that is, cartoon faces (SoundFace), colored fish (SoundFish), and geometric shapes (SoundPolygon), respectively. The present study investigated the effect of these different visual stimuli on performance in audiovisual associative equivalence learning. Learning performance was assessed across three phases: acquisition, retrieval, and generalization. A total of 52 participants (25 females, 27 males, mean age = 25.88 ± 10.28 years) completed the tasks. Statistical analyses, including Friedman's ANOVA and Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests with Bonferroni correction, were applied to evaluate differences in performance across the tests.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants consistently performed significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) better and responded faster in learning, retrieval, and generalization phases of the SoundFace test compared to the SoundFish and SoundPolygon tests, which did not significantly differ from each other. Additionally, a semantic association task confirmed that face and fish stimuli were significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) richer in semantic content than polygons, yet only face stimuli significantly facilitated audiovisual learning outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>These results suggest that the semantic content of visual stimuli—which could influence their verbalizability—is not sufficient on its own to enhance performance in audiovisual associative learning. Additionally, the number and variety of different features in visual stimulus sets (such as faces, fish, or polygons) may also significantly influence performance in audiovisual equivalence learning.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70902\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70902\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70902","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

罗格斯获得性等效性测试(RAET)是一项联想学习任务,要求参与者学习成对的视觉刺激,然后回忆和概括这些联系。为了进一步探索这一认知任务,我们开发了三种与原始RAET结构相同的视听学习测试。方法每项视听测试均采用相同的四种不同的听觉前词,分别是卡通面孔(SoundFace)、彩色鱼(SoundFish)和几何形状(SoundPolygon),但视觉结果在复杂性和语义内容上存在差异。本研究探讨了这些不同的视觉刺激对视听联想等效学习成绩的影响。学习表现分为三个阶段:习得、检索和概括。共有52名参与者完成了任务,其中女性25人,男性27人,平均年龄为25.88±10.28岁。统计分析,包括Friedman's ANOVA和Wilcoxon配对对检验与Bonferroni校正,应用于评估测试之间的性能差异。结果与SoundFish和SoundPolygon测试相比,参与者在SoundFace测试的学习、检索和泛化阶段的表现一致(p < 0.01)更好,反应更快,两者之间没有显著差异。此外,语义关联任务证实,面部和鱼类刺激显著(p < 0.01)比多边形更丰富的语义内容,但只有面部刺激显著促进视听学习结果。结论视觉刺激的语义内容可能影响学生的语言表达能力,但其本身并不足以提高学生的视听联想学习成绩。此外,视觉刺激集(如脸、鱼或多边形)中不同特征的数量和种类也可能显著影响视听等效学习的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Combined Effect of Visual Stimulus Complexity and Semantic Content on Audiovisual Associative Equivalence Learning

The Combined Effect of Visual Stimulus Complexity and Semantic Content on Audiovisual Associative Equivalence Learning

Background

The Rutgers Acquired Equivalence Test (RAET) is an associative learning task that requires participants to learn pairs of visual stimuli and then recall and generalize these associations. To further explore this cognitive task, we developed three audiovisual learning tests with the same structure as the original RAET.

Methods

Each audiovisual test applied the same four distinct auditory antecedents but differed in visual consequents in complexity and semantic content, that is, cartoon faces (SoundFace), colored fish (SoundFish), and geometric shapes (SoundPolygon), respectively. The present study investigated the effect of these different visual stimuli on performance in audiovisual associative equivalence learning. Learning performance was assessed across three phases: acquisition, retrieval, and generalization. A total of 52 participants (25 females, 27 males, mean age = 25.88 ± 10.28 years) completed the tasks. Statistical analyses, including Friedman's ANOVA and Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests with Bonferroni correction, were applied to evaluate differences in performance across the tests.

Results

Participants consistently performed significantly (p < 0.01) better and responded faster in learning, retrieval, and generalization phases of the SoundFace test compared to the SoundFish and SoundPolygon tests, which did not significantly differ from each other. Additionally, a semantic association task confirmed that face and fish stimuli were significantly (p < 0.01) richer in semantic content than polygons, yet only face stimuli significantly facilitated audiovisual learning outcomes.

Conclusion

These results suggest that the semantic content of visual stimuli—which could influence their verbalizability—is not sufficient on its own to enhance performance in audiovisual associative learning. Additionally, the number and variety of different features in visual stimulus sets (such as faces, fish, or polygons) may also significantly influence performance in audiovisual equivalence learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain and Behavior
Brain and Behavior BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
352
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain and Behavior is supported by other journals published by Wiley, including a number of society-owned journals. The journals listed below support Brain and Behavior and participate in the Manuscript Transfer Program by referring articles of suitable quality and offering authors the option to have their paper, with any peer review reports, automatically transferred to Brain and Behavior. * [Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica](https://publons.com/journal/1366/acta-psychiatrica-scandinavica) * [Addiction Biology](https://publons.com/journal/1523/addiction-biology) * [Aggressive Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/3611/aggressive-behavior) * [Brain Pathology](https://publons.com/journal/1787/brain-pathology) * [Child: Care, Health and Development](https://publons.com/journal/6111/child-care-health-and-development) * [Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health](https://publons.com/journal/3839/criminal-behaviour-and-mental-health) * [Depression and Anxiety](https://publons.com/journal/1528/depression-and-anxiety) * Developmental Neurobiology * [Developmental Science](https://publons.com/journal/1069/developmental-science) * [European Journal of Neuroscience](https://publons.com/journal/1441/european-journal-of-neuroscience) * [Genes, Brain and Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1635/genes-brain-and-behavior) * [GLIA](https://publons.com/journal/1287/glia) * [Hippocampus](https://publons.com/journal/1056/hippocampus) * [Human Brain Mapping](https://publons.com/journal/500/human-brain-mapping) * [Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour](https://publons.com/journal/7330/journal-for-the-theory-of-social-behaviour) * [Journal of Comparative Neurology](https://publons.com/journal/1306/journal-of-comparative-neurology) * [Journal of Neuroimaging](https://publons.com/journal/6379/journal-of-neuroimaging) * [Journal of Neuroscience Research](https://publons.com/journal/2778/journal-of-neuroscience-research) * [Journal of Organizational Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1123/journal-of-organizational-behavior) * [Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System](https://publons.com/journal/3929/journal-of-the-peripheral-nervous-system) * [Muscle & Nerve](https://publons.com/journal/4448/muscle-and-nerve) * [Neural Pathology and Applied Neurobiology](https://publons.com/journal/2401/neuropathology-and-applied-neurobiology)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信