更环保更安全?地缘政治风险上升背景下绿色金融在能源安全中的作用

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Duc Hong Vo , Chi Minh Ho , Ngoc Duc Lang
{"title":"更环保更安全?地缘政治风险上升背景下绿色金融在能源安全中的作用","authors":"Duc Hong Vo ,&nbsp;Chi Minh Ho ,&nbsp;Ngoc Duc Lang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy security is an undeniably crucial factor in economies' stable functioning and societies' well-being. However, global energy security has been continuously threatened by adverse geopolitical events. This study is conducted to examine if green finance can be an effective tool to improve energy security and, if so, whether green finance can act as a shield against geopolitical risk using a sample of 37 countries from 2013 to 2018. Our analysis is also extended to use another proxy of energy security for 36 countries in an extended and updated period from 2013 to 2022. Our results show that green finance can significantly reduce energy security risks worldwide. Furthermore, our heterogeneity analysis shows that the impact of green finance on energy security risks is also more substantial in the OECD (IEA) countries than in non-OECD (non-IEA) countries. Results from the panel quantile regression also show that the impact of green finance is heterogeneous and significant across different quantiles of energy security. This finding suggests a V-shaped pattern from the effect of green finance, indicating that countries with either very high or very low levels of energy security risk benefit the most from green finance. Interestingly, when green finance is considered a moderator in the effect of geopolitical risk on energy security, we find that green finance acts as a shield against the adverse impacts of increasing geopolitical risk. Our results are robust against endogeneity and largely unchanged across different estimations. Important policy implications have emerged from our findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 108902"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Greener for greater security? The role of green finance in energy security amid rising geopolitical risks\",\"authors\":\"Duc Hong Vo ,&nbsp;Chi Minh Ho ,&nbsp;Ngoc Duc Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Energy security is an undeniably crucial factor in economies' stable functioning and societies' well-being. However, global energy security has been continuously threatened by adverse geopolitical events. This study is conducted to examine if green finance can be an effective tool to improve energy security and, if so, whether green finance can act as a shield against geopolitical risk using a sample of 37 countries from 2013 to 2018. Our analysis is also extended to use another proxy of energy security for 36 countries in an extended and updated period from 2013 to 2022. Our results show that green finance can significantly reduce energy security risks worldwide. Furthermore, our heterogeneity analysis shows that the impact of green finance on energy security risks is also more substantial in the OECD (IEA) countries than in non-OECD (non-IEA) countries. Results from the panel quantile regression also show that the impact of green finance is heterogeneous and significant across different quantiles of energy security. This finding suggests a V-shaped pattern from the effect of green finance, indicating that countries with either very high or very low levels of energy security risk benefit the most from green finance. Interestingly, when green finance is considered a moderator in the effect of geopolitical risk on energy security, we find that green finance acts as a shield against the adverse impacts of increasing geopolitical risk. Our results are robust against endogeneity and largely unchanged across different estimations. Important policy implications have emerged from our findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"151 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108902\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007297\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不可否认,能源安全是经济稳定运行和社会福祉的关键因素。然而,全球能源安全不断受到不利地缘政治事件的威胁。本研究以2013年至2018年的37个国家为样本,探讨绿色金融是否可以成为改善能源安全的有效工具,如果可以,绿色金融是否可以作为抵御地缘政治风险的屏障。我们的分析还扩展到了36个国家在2013年至2022年延长和更新期间的能源安全的另一个代理。研究结果表明,绿色金融能够显著降低全球能源安全风险。此外,我们的异质性分析表明,绿色金融对能源安全风险的影响在经合组织(IEA)国家也比在非经合组织(非IEA)国家更为显著。面板分位数回归的结果也表明,绿色金融对能源安全的影响在不同的分位数上具有异质性和显著性。这一发现表明绿色金融的效应呈v形,表明能源安全风险水平非常高或非常低的国家从绿色金融中受益最多。有趣的是,当绿色金融被认为是地缘政治风险对能源安全影响的调节因子时,我们发现绿色金融在抵御地缘政治风险增加的不利影响方面发挥了屏蔽作用。我们的结果对内生性是稳健的,并且在不同的估计中基本不变。我们的研究结果产生了重要的政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Greener for greater security? The role of green finance in energy security amid rising geopolitical risks
Energy security is an undeniably crucial factor in economies' stable functioning and societies' well-being. However, global energy security has been continuously threatened by adverse geopolitical events. This study is conducted to examine if green finance can be an effective tool to improve energy security and, if so, whether green finance can act as a shield against geopolitical risk using a sample of 37 countries from 2013 to 2018. Our analysis is also extended to use another proxy of energy security for 36 countries in an extended and updated period from 2013 to 2022. Our results show that green finance can significantly reduce energy security risks worldwide. Furthermore, our heterogeneity analysis shows that the impact of green finance on energy security risks is also more substantial in the OECD (IEA) countries than in non-OECD (non-IEA) countries. Results from the panel quantile regression also show that the impact of green finance is heterogeneous and significant across different quantiles of energy security. This finding suggests a V-shaped pattern from the effect of green finance, indicating that countries with either very high or very low levels of energy security risk benefit the most from green finance. Interestingly, when green finance is considered a moderator in the effect of geopolitical risk on energy security, we find that green finance acts as a shield against the adverse impacts of increasing geopolitical risk. Our results are robust against endogeneity and largely unchanged across different estimations. Important policy implications have emerged from our findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信