Seohyeon Choi , Emily A. Reno , Jechun An , Emma Shanahan , Erica Lembke , Kristen L. McMaster
{"title":"探索潜在的写作特征及其与干预反应的关系","authors":"Seohyeon Choi , Emily A. Reno , Jechun An , Emma Shanahan , Erica Lembke , Kristen L. McMaster","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigated whether elementary students identified as needing intensive early writing interventions exhibit distinct writing profiles based on key writing dimensions—accuracy, productivity, and quality/complexity. We also explored whether the effects of writing support within a Data-Based Individualization (DBI) framework differed by students' writing profile membership. Latent profile analysis conducted on a sample of students (<em>N</em> = 289) with intensive early writing needs—approximately half of whom received DBI support, while the rest received business-as-usual writing instruction—identified three distinct profiles. These profiles varied in the specificity and severity of needs across the writing dimensions. Mixed-effects modeling revealed that students' profile membership did not moderate the impact of DBI on post-intervention writing outcomes. We discuss these findings in relation to theoretical and methodological implications for better understanding and examining young students struggling with beginning writing, as well as practical implications for instructional and assessment practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 102790"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring latent writing profiles and their connection to intervention responsiveness\",\"authors\":\"Seohyeon Choi , Emily A. Reno , Jechun An , Emma Shanahan , Erica Lembke , Kristen L. McMaster\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We investigated whether elementary students identified as needing intensive early writing interventions exhibit distinct writing profiles based on key writing dimensions—accuracy, productivity, and quality/complexity. We also explored whether the effects of writing support within a Data-Based Individualization (DBI) framework differed by students' writing profile membership. Latent profile analysis conducted on a sample of students (<em>N</em> = 289) with intensive early writing needs—approximately half of whom received DBI support, while the rest received business-as-usual writing instruction—identified three distinct profiles. These profiles varied in the specificity and severity of needs across the writing dimensions. Mixed-effects modeling revealed that students' profile membership did not moderate the impact of DBI on post-intervention writing outcomes. We discuss these findings in relation to theoretical and methodological implications for better understanding and examining young students struggling with beginning writing, as well as practical implications for instructional and assessment practices.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"124 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025001669\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025001669","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring latent writing profiles and their connection to intervention responsiveness
We investigated whether elementary students identified as needing intensive early writing interventions exhibit distinct writing profiles based on key writing dimensions—accuracy, productivity, and quality/complexity. We also explored whether the effects of writing support within a Data-Based Individualization (DBI) framework differed by students' writing profile membership. Latent profile analysis conducted on a sample of students (N = 289) with intensive early writing needs—approximately half of whom received DBI support, while the rest received business-as-usual writing instruction—identified three distinct profiles. These profiles varied in the specificity and severity of needs across the writing dimensions. Mixed-effects modeling revealed that students' profile membership did not moderate the impact of DBI on post-intervention writing outcomes. We discuss these findings in relation to theoretical and methodological implications for better understanding and examining young students struggling with beginning writing, as well as practical implications for instructional and assessment practices.
期刊介绍:
Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).