探索潜在的写作特征及其与干预反应的关系

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Seohyeon Choi , Emily A. Reno , Jechun An , Emma Shanahan , Erica Lembke , Kristen L. McMaster
{"title":"探索潜在的写作特征及其与干预反应的关系","authors":"Seohyeon Choi ,&nbsp;Emily A. Reno ,&nbsp;Jechun An ,&nbsp;Emma Shanahan ,&nbsp;Erica Lembke ,&nbsp;Kristen L. McMaster","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigated whether elementary students identified as needing intensive early writing interventions exhibit distinct writing profiles based on key writing dimensions—accuracy, productivity, and quality/complexity. We also explored whether the effects of writing support within a Data-Based Individualization (DBI) framework differed by students' writing profile membership. Latent profile analysis conducted on a sample of students (<em>N</em> = 289) with intensive early writing needs—approximately half of whom received DBI support, while the rest received business-as-usual writing instruction—identified three distinct profiles. These profiles varied in the specificity and severity of needs across the writing dimensions. Mixed-effects modeling revealed that students' profile membership did not moderate the impact of DBI on post-intervention writing outcomes. We discuss these findings in relation to theoretical and methodological implications for better understanding and examining young students struggling with beginning writing, as well as practical implications for instructional and assessment practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 102790"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring latent writing profiles and their connection to intervention responsiveness\",\"authors\":\"Seohyeon Choi ,&nbsp;Emily A. Reno ,&nbsp;Jechun An ,&nbsp;Emma Shanahan ,&nbsp;Erica Lembke ,&nbsp;Kristen L. McMaster\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We investigated whether elementary students identified as needing intensive early writing interventions exhibit distinct writing profiles based on key writing dimensions—accuracy, productivity, and quality/complexity. We also explored whether the effects of writing support within a Data-Based Individualization (DBI) framework differed by students' writing profile membership. Latent profile analysis conducted on a sample of students (<em>N</em> = 289) with intensive early writing needs—approximately half of whom received DBI support, while the rest received business-as-usual writing instruction—identified three distinct profiles. These profiles varied in the specificity and severity of needs across the writing dimensions. Mixed-effects modeling revealed that students' profile membership did not moderate the impact of DBI on post-intervention writing outcomes. We discuss these findings in relation to theoretical and methodological implications for better understanding and examining young students struggling with beginning writing, as well as practical implications for instructional and assessment practices.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"124 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025001669\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025001669","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们调查了被确定需要密集的早期写作干预的小学生是否表现出基于关键写作维度(准确性、生产力和质量/复杂性)的不同写作特征。我们还探讨了在基于数据的个性化(DBI)框架中,写作支持的效果是否因学生的写作档案成员而异。对具有密集早期写作需求的学生样本(N = 289)进行了潜在特征分析,其中大约一半接受了DBI支持,而其余的则接受了日常写作指导,确定了三种不同的特征。这些特征在写作需求的特异性和严重性上各不相同。混合效应模型显示,学生的档案成员没有调节DBI对干预后写作结果的影响。我们将讨论这些发现对更好地理解和检查在开始写作方面挣扎的年轻学生的理论和方法意义,以及对教学和评估实践的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring latent writing profiles and their connection to intervention responsiveness
We investigated whether elementary students identified as needing intensive early writing interventions exhibit distinct writing profiles based on key writing dimensions—accuracy, productivity, and quality/complexity. We also explored whether the effects of writing support within a Data-Based Individualization (DBI) framework differed by students' writing profile membership. Latent profile analysis conducted on a sample of students (N = 289) with intensive early writing needs—approximately half of whom received DBI support, while the rest received business-as-usual writing instruction—identified three distinct profiles. These profiles varied in the specificity and severity of needs across the writing dimensions. Mixed-effects modeling revealed that students' profile membership did not moderate the impact of DBI on post-intervention writing outcomes. We discuss these findings in relation to theoretical and methodological implications for better understanding and examining young students struggling with beginning writing, as well as practical implications for instructional and assessment practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信