从外国贸易限制的角度对美国关键矿产供应链的评估

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Ji Won Moon, Sean Y. Xun, Jaewon Chung, Steven D. Textoris
{"title":"从外国贸易限制的角度对美国关键矿产供应链的评估","authors":"Ji Won Moon,&nbsp;Sean Y. Xun,&nbsp;Jaewon Chung,&nbsp;Steven D. Textoris","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, major global producers of the 50 critical minerals designated by the United States government in 2022 were investigated to analyze the supply chain vulnerability to the United States by screening a single foreign country’s role at extraction, processing, and trade. The “freedom in the world” indicator was integrated into these stages to calculate the score of potential risk (<em>Spr</em>), which this study introduced to assess the likelihood of supply chain disruptions. The commodities with high scores of <em>Spr</em> (Tier 1) matched the ones with existing export-controlled critical minerals imposed by China until 2023, which include gallium, germanium, graphite, rare earths, and tungsten. In order of <em>Spr</em>, the remaining minerals were classified into tiers of potential supply risk: Tier 1 (<em>Spr</em> ≥ 50%) indicates high risk (bismuth, magnesium, antimony, and tellurium); Tier 2 (50% &gt; <em>Spr</em> ≥ 32%), moderate risk (indium, vanadium, arsenic, tantalum, and zirconium); and Tier 3 (<em>Spr</em> &lt; 32% with high potential risk if geopolitical conditions change), low to sensitive risk (niobium and platinum). The effectiveness of the approach was further demonstrated by the 2024 export controls implemented by China on antimony, bismuth, and magnesium, which were all classified as Tier 1 prior to the restriction. A short list of critical minerals in this study may be monitored although the current risk is low. The <em>Spr</em> of critical minerals provided an indicator in determining the levels and sources of potential supply risk as well as informing mitigation strategies in the years ahead.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 105726"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of critical minerals supply chain for the United States in perspective of trade restriction by foreign countries\",\"authors\":\"Ji Won Moon,&nbsp;Sean Y. Xun,&nbsp;Jaewon Chung,&nbsp;Steven D. Textoris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this study, major global producers of the 50 critical minerals designated by the United States government in 2022 were investigated to analyze the supply chain vulnerability to the United States by screening a single foreign country’s role at extraction, processing, and trade. The “freedom in the world” indicator was integrated into these stages to calculate the score of potential risk (<em>Spr</em>), which this study introduced to assess the likelihood of supply chain disruptions. The commodities with high scores of <em>Spr</em> (Tier 1) matched the ones with existing export-controlled critical minerals imposed by China until 2023, which include gallium, germanium, graphite, rare earths, and tungsten. In order of <em>Spr</em>, the remaining minerals were classified into tiers of potential supply risk: Tier 1 (<em>Spr</em> ≥ 50%) indicates high risk (bismuth, magnesium, antimony, and tellurium); Tier 2 (50% &gt; <em>Spr</em> ≥ 32%), moderate risk (indium, vanadium, arsenic, tantalum, and zirconium); and Tier 3 (<em>Spr</em> &lt; 32% with high potential risk if geopolitical conditions change), low to sensitive risk (niobium and platinum). The effectiveness of the approach was further demonstrated by the 2024 export controls implemented by China on antimony, bismuth, and magnesium, which were all classified as Tier 1 prior to the restriction. A short list of critical minerals in this study may be monitored although the current risk is low. The <em>Spr</em> of critical minerals provided an indicator in determining the levels and sources of potential supply risk as well as informing mitigation strategies in the years ahead.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":\"110 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105726\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725002685\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725002685","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,调查了美国政府在2022年指定的50种关键矿物的全球主要生产商,通过筛选单个外国在开采、加工和贸易方面的作用,分析了供应链对美国的脆弱性。“世界自由”指标被整合到这些阶段来计算潜在风险(Spr)的分数,本研究引入Spr来评估供应链中断的可能性。具有高Spr(一级)分数的商品与中国在2023年之前实施的现有出口控制关键矿物相匹配,包括镓、锗、石墨、稀土和钨。根据Spr大小,将剩余矿种划分为潜在供应风险等级:一级(Spr≥50%)为高风险(铋、镁、锑、碲);2级(50% > Spr≥32%),中度风险(铟、钒、砷、钽和锆);第三级(Spr < 32%,如果地缘政治条件发生变化,潜在风险很高),低至敏感风险(铌和铂)。中国在2024年对锑、铋和镁实施的出口管制进一步证明了这种方法的有效性,这些产品在限制之前都被列为一级。虽然目前的风险很低,但这项研究中的一小部分关键矿物质可能会受到监测。关键矿物的战略资源为确定潜在供应风险的水平和来源以及为今后几年的缓解战略提供信息提供了一个指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of critical minerals supply chain for the United States in perspective of trade restriction by foreign countries
In this study, major global producers of the 50 critical minerals designated by the United States government in 2022 were investigated to analyze the supply chain vulnerability to the United States by screening a single foreign country’s role at extraction, processing, and trade. The “freedom in the world” indicator was integrated into these stages to calculate the score of potential risk (Spr), which this study introduced to assess the likelihood of supply chain disruptions. The commodities with high scores of Spr (Tier 1) matched the ones with existing export-controlled critical minerals imposed by China until 2023, which include gallium, germanium, graphite, rare earths, and tungsten. In order of Spr, the remaining minerals were classified into tiers of potential supply risk: Tier 1 (Spr ≥ 50%) indicates high risk (bismuth, magnesium, antimony, and tellurium); Tier 2 (50% > Spr ≥ 32%), moderate risk (indium, vanadium, arsenic, tantalum, and zirconium); and Tier 3 (Spr < 32% with high potential risk if geopolitical conditions change), low to sensitive risk (niobium and platinum). The effectiveness of the approach was further demonstrated by the 2024 export controls implemented by China on antimony, bismuth, and magnesium, which were all classified as Tier 1 prior to the restriction. A short list of critical minerals in this study may be monitored although the current risk is low. The Spr of critical minerals provided an indicator in determining the levels and sources of potential supply risk as well as informing mitigation strategies in the years ahead.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信