对超过最低刑事责任年龄的儿童的法医评估中的发育因素:2013-2024年挪威法医报告研究

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q1 LAW
Kari Eriksen Øverland , Kevin S. Douglas , Elisabeth Norman , A. Linda Gröning
{"title":"对超过最低刑事责任年龄的儿童的法医评估中的发育因素:2013-2024年挪威法医报告研究","authors":"Kari Eriksen Øverland ,&nbsp;Kevin S. Douglas ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Norman ,&nbsp;A. Linda Gröning","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2025.102154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the international recognition of children's evolving capacities and the importance of incorporating these factors into forensic assessments, there is limited research on forensic practices specific to children above the minimum age of criminal responsibility (MACR). The current study is part of a larger project examining legal and forensic assessments related to children's criminal unaccountability (criminal insanity) in Norway. The aim of the current study was to examine how forensic assessments of children above the MACR are conducted in Norway, and to what extent developmental factors are considered in these assessments. Drawing on existing literature, we first propose a set of principles for developmentally informed forensic assessments of children. The principles address direct expert-child interaction; structured assessment procedures; collateral/contextual information; cultural responsiveness; and the qualifications of forensic experts. We then evaluated 122 forensic assessments of children aged 15 to 18 years according to the proposed principles. Our findings revealed significant gaps, including minimal direct engagement with the child, low usage of structured assessment tools, limited collateral information from caregivers and schools, lack of cultural considerations and a concerning lack of child-specific expertise among forensic experts. These shortcomings underscore the need for more rigorous and developmentally sensitive practices. Recommendations include enhanced training, incorporating developmental principles into curricula, and establishing standardized protocols integrating structured assessment tools and comprehensive contextual information. While conducted in a Norwegian context, our study calls for further research in other jurisdictions to develop international guidelines that accommodate the unique developmental needs of children in forensic settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 102154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developmental factors in forensic assessments of children over the minimum age of criminal responsibility: A study of forensic reports in Norway 2013–2024\",\"authors\":\"Kari Eriksen Øverland ,&nbsp;Kevin S. Douglas ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Norman ,&nbsp;A. Linda Gröning\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijlp.2025.102154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite the international recognition of children's evolving capacities and the importance of incorporating these factors into forensic assessments, there is limited research on forensic practices specific to children above the minimum age of criminal responsibility (MACR). The current study is part of a larger project examining legal and forensic assessments related to children's criminal unaccountability (criminal insanity) in Norway. The aim of the current study was to examine how forensic assessments of children above the MACR are conducted in Norway, and to what extent developmental factors are considered in these assessments. Drawing on existing literature, we first propose a set of principles for developmentally informed forensic assessments of children. The principles address direct expert-child interaction; structured assessment procedures; collateral/contextual information; cultural responsiveness; and the qualifications of forensic experts. We then evaluated 122 forensic assessments of children aged 15 to 18 years according to the proposed principles. Our findings revealed significant gaps, including minimal direct engagement with the child, low usage of structured assessment tools, limited collateral information from caregivers and schools, lack of cultural considerations and a concerning lack of child-specific expertise among forensic experts. These shortcomings underscore the need for more rigorous and developmentally sensitive practices. Recommendations include enhanced training, incorporating developmental principles into curricula, and establishing standardized protocols integrating structured assessment tools and comprehensive contextual information. While conducted in a Norwegian context, our study calls for further research in other jurisdictions to develop international guidelines that accommodate the unique developmental needs of children in forensic settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"104 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252725000871\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252725000871","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管国际上认识到儿童不断发展的能力以及将这些因素纳入法医评估的重要性,但针对最低刑事责任年龄以上儿童的法医实践的研究有限。目前的研究是一个更大项目的一部分,该项目审查与挪威儿童犯罪不负责任(犯罪精神错乱)有关的法律和法医评估。本研究的目的是研究在挪威如何对高于MACR的儿童进行法医评估,以及这些评估在多大程度上考虑了发育因素。借鉴现有文献,我们首先提出了一套发展知情儿童法医评估的原则。这些原则涉及专家与儿童的直接互动;结构化评估程序;抵押/上下文信息;文化反应;以及法医专家的资格。然后,我们根据建议的原则评估了122名15至18岁儿童的法医评估。我们的研究结果揭示了显著的差距,包括与儿童的直接接触很少,结构化评估工具的使用率低,来自照顾者和学校的附带信息有限,缺乏文化考虑以及法医专家缺乏针对儿童的专业知识。这些缺点强调需要更严格和对发展敏感的做法。建议包括加强培训,将发展原则纳入课程,建立整合结构化评估工具和全面背景信息的标准化协议。虽然是在挪威的背景下进行的,但我们的研究呼吁在其他司法管辖区进行进一步的研究,以制定适应法医环境中儿童独特发展需求的国际准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developmental factors in forensic assessments of children over the minimum age of criminal responsibility: A study of forensic reports in Norway 2013–2024
Despite the international recognition of children's evolving capacities and the importance of incorporating these factors into forensic assessments, there is limited research on forensic practices specific to children above the minimum age of criminal responsibility (MACR). The current study is part of a larger project examining legal and forensic assessments related to children's criminal unaccountability (criminal insanity) in Norway. The aim of the current study was to examine how forensic assessments of children above the MACR are conducted in Norway, and to what extent developmental factors are considered in these assessments. Drawing on existing literature, we first propose a set of principles for developmentally informed forensic assessments of children. The principles address direct expert-child interaction; structured assessment procedures; collateral/contextual information; cultural responsiveness; and the qualifications of forensic experts. We then evaluated 122 forensic assessments of children aged 15 to 18 years according to the proposed principles. Our findings revealed significant gaps, including minimal direct engagement with the child, low usage of structured assessment tools, limited collateral information from caregivers and schools, lack of cultural considerations and a concerning lack of child-specific expertise among forensic experts. These shortcomings underscore the need for more rigorous and developmentally sensitive practices. Recommendations include enhanced training, incorporating developmental principles into curricula, and establishing standardized protocols integrating structured assessment tools and comprehensive contextual information. While conducted in a Norwegian context, our study calls for further research in other jurisdictions to develop international guidelines that accommodate the unique developmental needs of children in forensic settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信