日本三陆岛不同海岸地貌的海啸模拟和巨石移动

IF 3.1 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Storm Roberts , Daisuke Sugawara , Hidetoshi Masuda , Sarah J. Boulton
{"title":"日本三陆岛不同海岸地貌的海啸模拟和巨石移动","authors":"Storm Roberts ,&nbsp;Daisuke Sugawara ,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Masuda ,&nbsp;Sarah J. Boulton","doi":"10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.110026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tsunami boulders serve as crucial indicators for reconstructing past tsunami events, yet their full transport process remains poorly understood. This study investigates tsunami boulder transport at two geomorphically distinct field sites in Japan affected by the 2011 tsunami, integrating field data with a validated tsunami simulation to track wave parameters at every transport stage. The simulation was validated against eyewitness accounts, local reports, and offshore GPS buoy data. Near the shoreline at the Settai site simulated flow velocities reached a maximum of 7.55 m/s, compared to 6.51 m/s at Hoshiyama beach. Inland at Settai, a maximum 15.56 m/s flow velocity and 17.49 m flow depth were recorded just inland of the partially destroyed barrier. Boulder transport information was compiled from previous studies alongside new field data to assess how tsunamis interact with coastal boulder deposits in different geomorphological settings. Comparison of boulder lithologies, shapes, and distributions revealed similarities in wave influence but differences in deposition patterns due to variations in slope. Commonly used initiation of motion equations were then tested against simulated data. For example, Boulder #1 at Hoshiyama beach had an A-axis of 7.35 m and a minimum calculated velocity for initiation of motion of 6.46 m/s, whilst the tsunami simulation estimated a maximum flow velocity of 6.51 m/s. Although these values are similar, the boulder's position on top of other large clasts suggests that greater energy would have been required for transport and emplacement. Overall, the comparisons showed that while recent refinements have significantly improved the accuracy of the equations, they may still overestimate the minimum flow velocity required for boulder transport. By combining detailed field observations with numerical modelling, this study provides a rare case study capturing parameters at all boulder transport stages, offering a critical reference for future tsunami boulder research and model development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55115,"journal":{"name":"Geomorphology","volume":"490 ","pages":"Article 110026"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tsunami simulation and boulder transport across contrasting coastal geomorphologies in Sanriku, Japan\",\"authors\":\"Storm Roberts ,&nbsp;Daisuke Sugawara ,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Masuda ,&nbsp;Sarah J. Boulton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.110026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Tsunami boulders serve as crucial indicators for reconstructing past tsunami events, yet their full transport process remains poorly understood. This study investigates tsunami boulder transport at two geomorphically distinct field sites in Japan affected by the 2011 tsunami, integrating field data with a validated tsunami simulation to track wave parameters at every transport stage. The simulation was validated against eyewitness accounts, local reports, and offshore GPS buoy data. Near the shoreline at the Settai site simulated flow velocities reached a maximum of 7.55 m/s, compared to 6.51 m/s at Hoshiyama beach. Inland at Settai, a maximum 15.56 m/s flow velocity and 17.49 m flow depth were recorded just inland of the partially destroyed barrier. Boulder transport information was compiled from previous studies alongside new field data to assess how tsunamis interact with coastal boulder deposits in different geomorphological settings. Comparison of boulder lithologies, shapes, and distributions revealed similarities in wave influence but differences in deposition patterns due to variations in slope. Commonly used initiation of motion equations were then tested against simulated data. For example, Boulder #1 at Hoshiyama beach had an A-axis of 7.35 m and a minimum calculated velocity for initiation of motion of 6.46 m/s, whilst the tsunami simulation estimated a maximum flow velocity of 6.51 m/s. Although these values are similar, the boulder's position on top of other large clasts suggests that greater energy would have been required for transport and emplacement. Overall, the comparisons showed that while recent refinements have significantly improved the accuracy of the equations, they may still overestimate the minimum flow velocity required for boulder transport. By combining detailed field observations with numerical modelling, this study provides a rare case study capturing parameters at all boulder transport stages, offering a critical reference for future tsunami boulder research and model development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geomorphology\",\"volume\":\"490 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geomorphology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X25004362\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomorphology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X25004362","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海啸巨石是重建过去海啸事件的关键指标,但它们的完整运输过程仍然知之甚少。本研究调查了2011年日本受海啸影响的两个地貌不同的现场地点的海啸巨石运输,将现场数据与经过验证的海啸模拟相结合,跟踪了每个运输阶段的波浪参数。通过目击者描述、当地报告和海上GPS浮标数据验证了模拟结果。在Settai站点的海岸线附近,模拟流速最大达到7.55米/秒,而在Hoshiyama海滩则为6.51米/秒。在内陆的Settai,最大流速为15.56 m/s,流深为17.49 m。从以前的研究和新的实地数据中收集了巨石运输信息,以评估海啸如何与不同地貌环境下的海岸巨石沉积相互作用。对卵石的岩性、形状和分布进行比较,发现波浪的影响相似,但由于坡度的变化,沉积模式不同。然后根据模拟数据对常用的运动起爆方程进行了测试。例如,Hoshiyama海滩的Boulder #1的a轴为7.35 m,计算出的最小运动起始速度为6.46 m/s,而海啸模拟估计的最大流速为6.51 m/s。虽然这些数值相似,但巨石在其他大碎片上的位置表明,它需要更大的能量来运输和放置。总的来说,比较表明,虽然最近的改进大大提高了方程的准确性,但它们可能仍然高估了巨石运输所需的最小流速。通过将详细的现场观测与数值模拟相结合,本研究提供了一个罕见的案例研究,捕获了所有巨石移动阶段的参数,为未来海啸巨石研究和模型开发提供了重要参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tsunami simulation and boulder transport across contrasting coastal geomorphologies in Sanriku, Japan
Tsunami boulders serve as crucial indicators for reconstructing past tsunami events, yet their full transport process remains poorly understood. This study investigates tsunami boulder transport at two geomorphically distinct field sites in Japan affected by the 2011 tsunami, integrating field data with a validated tsunami simulation to track wave parameters at every transport stage. The simulation was validated against eyewitness accounts, local reports, and offshore GPS buoy data. Near the shoreline at the Settai site simulated flow velocities reached a maximum of 7.55 m/s, compared to 6.51 m/s at Hoshiyama beach. Inland at Settai, a maximum 15.56 m/s flow velocity and 17.49 m flow depth were recorded just inland of the partially destroyed barrier. Boulder transport information was compiled from previous studies alongside new field data to assess how tsunamis interact with coastal boulder deposits in different geomorphological settings. Comparison of boulder lithologies, shapes, and distributions revealed similarities in wave influence but differences in deposition patterns due to variations in slope. Commonly used initiation of motion equations were then tested against simulated data. For example, Boulder #1 at Hoshiyama beach had an A-axis of 7.35 m and a minimum calculated velocity for initiation of motion of 6.46 m/s, whilst the tsunami simulation estimated a maximum flow velocity of 6.51 m/s. Although these values are similar, the boulder's position on top of other large clasts suggests that greater energy would have been required for transport and emplacement. Overall, the comparisons showed that while recent refinements have significantly improved the accuracy of the equations, they may still overestimate the minimum flow velocity required for boulder transport. By combining detailed field observations with numerical modelling, this study provides a rare case study capturing parameters at all boulder transport stages, offering a critical reference for future tsunami boulder research and model development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geomorphology
Geomorphology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Our journal''s scope includes geomorphic themes of: tectonics and regional structure; glacial processes and landforms; fluvial sequences, Quaternary environmental change and dating; fluvial processes and landforms; mass movement, slopes and periglacial processes; hillslopes and soil erosion; weathering, karst and soils; aeolian processes and landforms, coastal dunes and arid environments; coastal and marine processes, estuaries and lakes; modelling, theoretical and quantitative geomorphology; DEM, GIS and remote sensing methods and applications; hazards, applied and planetary geomorphology; and volcanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信