赫伯特螺钉与掌侧支撑钢板治疗成人舟骨不愈合骨折愈合率的比较

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Mohammed Hassan Hashem , Khaled Karam Abed El-Aleem Mohammed , Mohammed Osama Hegazi , Ahmed Naeem Atiyya
{"title":"赫伯特螺钉与掌侧支撑钢板治疗成人舟骨不愈合骨折愈合率的比较","authors":"Mohammed Hassan Hashem ,&nbsp;Khaled Karam Abed El-Aleem Mohammed ,&nbsp;Mohammed Osama Hegazi ,&nbsp;Ahmed Naeem Atiyya","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The disability and pain after a neglected scaphoid non-union fracture are well recorded in the literature. We aimed to compare and detect the short-term results of non-united scaphoid waist fracture treated by internal fixation and bone graft with the volar buttress plate utilization versus the Herbert screw.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a therapeutic study. This randomized, prospective comparative an intervention study was carried out on 30 cases with non-union scaphoid waist fractures. They were randomly categorized into two equal groups, group (A) treated by volar buttress plate fixation with bone graft, and group (B) managed by Herbert screw fixation along with bone graft. Bone graft in both groups was taken from the distal radius. All cases underwent clinical examination and radiological evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With an average of 18 months, thirty cases were followed up. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The union rate and time were insignificant difference between both groups. Insignificant differences were determined across either intervention groups in terms of grip strength, the visual analogue pain scale (VAS), the Mayo wrist score, and the quick disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand score (quick DASH score) during the early interval of follow-up postoperatively (at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months). Group (A) demonstrated shorter operative time and lower numbers of image intensifier intraoperatively in contrast to group (B). Hardware removal after union was needed in 3 patients of group (A) in variance to group (B), in which no cases need implant removal. The Radio-scaphoid (RS) impingement and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tenosynovitis exhibited a significant elevation in group (A) in contrast to group (B). Among the patients with scaphoid fracture non-union who underwent surgery, some cases did not achieve union after the initial procedure. We had to employ an alternative fixation method for these cases, and we followed them until union was achieved, and their function was restored. Specifically, three patients from group (A) (20%) [one case was fixed with a miniplate 2 mm, and two cases were fixed with a microplate 1.5 mm] and two patients from group (B) (13.3 %) required this approach.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The functional and radiological outcomes are comparable between volar buttress plate and Herbert screw in the treatment of non-united waist scaphoid fracture. The rate of removal of the implant is higher in the volar buttress plate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 11","pages":"Article 112759"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of union rate of scaphoid non-union fracture in adults by Herbert screw versus volar buttress plate\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Hassan Hashem ,&nbsp;Khaled Karam Abed El-Aleem Mohammed ,&nbsp;Mohammed Osama Hegazi ,&nbsp;Ahmed Naeem Atiyya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The disability and pain after a neglected scaphoid non-union fracture are well recorded in the literature. We aimed to compare and detect the short-term results of non-united scaphoid waist fracture treated by internal fixation and bone graft with the volar buttress plate utilization versus the Herbert screw.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a therapeutic study. This randomized, prospective comparative an intervention study was carried out on 30 cases with non-union scaphoid waist fractures. They were randomly categorized into two equal groups, group (A) treated by volar buttress plate fixation with bone graft, and group (B) managed by Herbert screw fixation along with bone graft. Bone graft in both groups was taken from the distal radius. All cases underwent clinical examination and radiological evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With an average of 18 months, thirty cases were followed up. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The union rate and time were insignificant difference between both groups. Insignificant differences were determined across either intervention groups in terms of grip strength, the visual analogue pain scale (VAS), the Mayo wrist score, and the quick disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand score (quick DASH score) during the early interval of follow-up postoperatively (at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months). Group (A) demonstrated shorter operative time and lower numbers of image intensifier intraoperatively in contrast to group (B). Hardware removal after union was needed in 3 patients of group (A) in variance to group (B), in which no cases need implant removal. The Radio-scaphoid (RS) impingement and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tenosynovitis exhibited a significant elevation in group (A) in contrast to group (B). Among the patients with scaphoid fracture non-union who underwent surgery, some cases did not achieve union after the initial procedure. We had to employ an alternative fixation method for these cases, and we followed them until union was achieved, and their function was restored. Specifically, three patients from group (A) (20%) [one case was fixed with a miniplate 2 mm, and two cases were fixed with a microplate 1.5 mm] and two patients from group (B) (13.3 %) required this approach.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The functional and radiological outcomes are comparable between volar buttress plate and Herbert screw in the treatment of non-united waist scaphoid fracture. The rate of removal of the implant is higher in the volar buttress plate.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":\"56 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 112759\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325006175\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325006175","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的文献对舟状骨不愈合骨折后的失能和疼痛有较好的记录。我们的目的是比较和检测利用掌侧支撑板和赫伯特螺钉进行内固定和植骨治疗舟状骨腰部非愈合骨折的短期效果。方法:这是一项治疗性研究。本研究对30例舟状骨腰部骨折不愈合患者进行了随机、前瞻性比较干预研究。随机分为两组,A组采用掌侧支板固定联合植骨,B组采用Herbert螺钉固定联合植骨。两组植骨均取自桡骨远端。所有病例均行临床检查和放射学评价。结果随访30例,平均随访18个月。两组的基线特征相似。两组患者愈合率及愈合时间差异无统计学意义。在术后随访早期(3,6,9和12个月),两组患者的握力、视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)、Mayo手腕评分和手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾评分(快速DASH评分)差异均不显著。与B组相比,A组手术时间短,术中图像增强器数量少。与B组相比,A组有3例患者在愈合后需要取出内固定物,B组无患者需要取出内固定物。与B组相比,a组桡骨舟状骨(RS)撞击和桡侧腕屈肌(FCR)腱鞘炎明显升高。在舟状骨骨折不愈合的患者中,一些患者在初次手术后未愈合。对于这些病例,我们不得不采用另一种固定方法,并随访至愈合,功能恢复。具体来说,A组的3例患者(20%)[1例用2mm微孔板固定,2例用1.5 mm微孔板固定]和B组的2例患者(13.3%)需要采用该方法。结论掌侧支撑钢板与赫伯特螺钉治疗腰舟骨不愈合骨折的功能和放射学效果相当。掌侧支撑板内植入物的取出率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of union rate of scaphoid non-union fracture in adults by Herbert screw versus volar buttress plate

Purpose

The disability and pain after a neglected scaphoid non-union fracture are well recorded in the literature. We aimed to compare and detect the short-term results of non-united scaphoid waist fracture treated by internal fixation and bone graft with the volar buttress plate utilization versus the Herbert screw.

Methods

This is a therapeutic study. This randomized, prospective comparative an intervention study was carried out on 30 cases with non-union scaphoid waist fractures. They were randomly categorized into two equal groups, group (A) treated by volar buttress plate fixation with bone graft, and group (B) managed by Herbert screw fixation along with bone graft. Bone graft in both groups was taken from the distal radius. All cases underwent clinical examination and radiological evaluation.

Results

With an average of 18 months, thirty cases were followed up. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The union rate and time were insignificant difference between both groups. Insignificant differences were determined across either intervention groups in terms of grip strength, the visual analogue pain scale (VAS), the Mayo wrist score, and the quick disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand score (quick DASH score) during the early interval of follow-up postoperatively (at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months). Group (A) demonstrated shorter operative time and lower numbers of image intensifier intraoperatively in contrast to group (B). Hardware removal after union was needed in 3 patients of group (A) in variance to group (B), in which no cases need implant removal. The Radio-scaphoid (RS) impingement and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tenosynovitis exhibited a significant elevation in group (A) in contrast to group (B). Among the patients with scaphoid fracture non-union who underwent surgery, some cases did not achieve union after the initial procedure. We had to employ an alternative fixation method for these cases, and we followed them until union was achieved, and their function was restored. Specifically, three patients from group (A) (20%) [one case was fixed with a miniplate 2 mm, and two cases were fixed with a microplate 1.5 mm] and two patients from group (B) (13.3 %) required this approach.

Conclusions

The functional and radiological outcomes are comparable between volar buttress plate and Herbert screw in the treatment of non-united waist scaphoid fracture. The rate of removal of the implant is higher in the volar buttress plate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信