倾斜管道积液临界气速计算:一种基于物理信息神经网络的方法

IF 4.9 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Xinru Zhang , Lei Hou , Xin Wang , Jiaquan Liu , Zuoliang Zhu
{"title":"倾斜管道积液临界气速计算:一种基于物理信息神经网络的方法","authors":"Xinru Zhang ,&nbsp;Lei Hou ,&nbsp;Xin Wang ,&nbsp;Jiaquan Liu ,&nbsp;Zuoliang Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.jpse.2025.100257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Liquid accumulation in gas pipelines will reduce transportation efficiency, increase corrosion rates, and induce severe slug flow. Calculation for critical gas velocity <em>v</em><sub>cg</sub> of liquid accumulation in inclined pipelines is important for the prevention of liquid accumulation. Due to the complexity of multiphase flow, the mechanism of liquid accumulation is still controversial. Many models have been proposed based on different liquid accumulation theories, but most of these models are complex and inaccurate. It is difficult to compare the calculation results of different theories in a unified standard. To simplify the calculation and improve the accuracy, a new physics-informed neural network (PINN) for calculating <em>v</em><sub>cg</sub> is proposed. PINN is trained only by the physical constraints of gas-liquid two-phase flow (GLF) and does not require any training data. In the same computational framework, PINN can calculate the <em>v</em><sub>cg</sub> corresponding to minimum pressure gradient (MPG), minimum gas-liquid interface shear stress (MIS), and zero liquid-wall shear stress (ZLS), respectively. In addition, the same two empirical equations are introduced for each calculation procedure, which ensures objectivity in the evaluation of different liquid accumulation theories. With 89 collected public experimental data, PINN is compared with 3 models based on different theories, and the changing law of <em>v</em><sub>cg</sub> are analyzed. The results show that PINN is applicable to a range of operating conditions with liquid superficial velocity from 0.001 to 0.100 m/s, pipe inclination from 2° to 20°, and pipe diameters from 50 to 200 mm. PINN are better than other models, and different theories have different sensitivities to each factor. This study provides a new computational method for the research of GLF and provides guidance for the prevention of liquid accumulation in gas pipelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100257"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calculation for critical gas velocity of liquid accumulation in inclined pipelines: A method based on physics-informed neural network\",\"authors\":\"Xinru Zhang ,&nbsp;Lei Hou ,&nbsp;Xin Wang ,&nbsp;Jiaquan Liu ,&nbsp;Zuoliang Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpse.2025.100257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Liquid accumulation in gas pipelines will reduce transportation efficiency, increase corrosion rates, and induce severe slug flow. Calculation for critical gas velocity <em>v</em><sub>cg</sub> of liquid accumulation in inclined pipelines is important for the prevention of liquid accumulation. Due to the complexity of multiphase flow, the mechanism of liquid accumulation is still controversial. Many models have been proposed based on different liquid accumulation theories, but most of these models are complex and inaccurate. It is difficult to compare the calculation results of different theories in a unified standard. To simplify the calculation and improve the accuracy, a new physics-informed neural network (PINN) for calculating <em>v</em><sub>cg</sub> is proposed. PINN is trained only by the physical constraints of gas-liquid two-phase flow (GLF) and does not require any training data. In the same computational framework, PINN can calculate the <em>v</em><sub>cg</sub> corresponding to minimum pressure gradient (MPG), minimum gas-liquid interface shear stress (MIS), and zero liquid-wall shear stress (ZLS), respectively. In addition, the same two empirical equations are introduced for each calculation procedure, which ensures objectivity in the evaluation of different liquid accumulation theories. With 89 collected public experimental data, PINN is compared with 3 models based on different theories, and the changing law of <em>v</em><sub>cg</sub> are analyzed. The results show that PINN is applicable to a range of operating conditions with liquid superficial velocity from 0.001 to 0.100 m/s, pipe inclination from 2° to 20°, and pipe diameters from 50 to 200 mm. PINN are better than other models, and different theories have different sensitivities to each factor. This study provides a new computational method for the research of GLF and provides guidance for the prevention of liquid accumulation in gas pipelines.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143325000046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143325000046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

天然气管道中的液体积聚会降低输送效率,增加腐蚀速率,并诱发严重的段塞流。倾斜管道积液临界气速vcg的计算对于防止积液具有重要意义。由于多相流的复杂性,液体积聚的机理仍存在争议。基于不同的液体积累理论,人们提出了许多模型,但这些模型大多复杂且不准确。用一个统一的标准比较不同理论的计算结果是困难的。为了简化计算,提高计算精度,提出了一种新的物理信息神经网络(PINN)来计算vcg。PINN仅受气液两相流(GLF)的物理约束进行训练,不需要任何训练数据。在相同的计算框架下,PINN可以分别计算最小压力梯度(MPG)、最小气液界面剪应力(MIS)和零液壁剪应力(ZLS)对应的vcg。此外,每个计算过程都引入了相同的两个经验方程,保证了不同液体积累理论评价的客观性。利用收集到的89个公开实验数据,将PINN与基于不同理论的3种模型进行了比较,分析了vcg的变化规律。结果表明,该方法适用于液体表面流速为0.001 ~ 0.100 m/s、管道倾角为2°~ 20°、管径为50 ~ 200mm的工况范围。PINN比其他模型更好,不同的理论对每个因素的敏感性不同。该研究为GLF的研究提供了一种新的计算方法,为防止天然气管道积液提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Calculation for critical gas velocity of liquid accumulation in inclined pipelines: A method based on physics-informed neural network
Liquid accumulation in gas pipelines will reduce transportation efficiency, increase corrosion rates, and induce severe slug flow. Calculation for critical gas velocity vcg of liquid accumulation in inclined pipelines is important for the prevention of liquid accumulation. Due to the complexity of multiphase flow, the mechanism of liquid accumulation is still controversial. Many models have been proposed based on different liquid accumulation theories, but most of these models are complex and inaccurate. It is difficult to compare the calculation results of different theories in a unified standard. To simplify the calculation and improve the accuracy, a new physics-informed neural network (PINN) for calculating vcg is proposed. PINN is trained only by the physical constraints of gas-liquid two-phase flow (GLF) and does not require any training data. In the same computational framework, PINN can calculate the vcg corresponding to minimum pressure gradient (MPG), minimum gas-liquid interface shear stress (MIS), and zero liquid-wall shear stress (ZLS), respectively. In addition, the same two empirical equations are introduced for each calculation procedure, which ensures objectivity in the evaluation of different liquid accumulation theories. With 89 collected public experimental data, PINN is compared with 3 models based on different theories, and the changing law of vcg are analyzed. The results show that PINN is applicable to a range of operating conditions with liquid superficial velocity from 0.001 to 0.100 m/s, pipe inclination from 2° to 20°, and pipe diameters from 50 to 200 mm. PINN are better than other models, and different theories have different sensitivities to each factor. This study provides a new computational method for the research of GLF and provides guidance for the prevention of liquid accumulation in gas pipelines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信