盾构隧道接缝橡胶密封垫片多准则评价模型

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Chenjie Gong , Chaoran Xie , Hehua Zhu , Zhiguo Yan
{"title":"盾构隧道接缝橡胶密封垫片多准则评价模型","authors":"Chenjie Gong ,&nbsp;Chaoran Xie ,&nbsp;Hehua Zhu ,&nbsp;Zhiguo Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.107127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rubber sealing gasket materials play a critical role in the waterproof design of joints in shield tunnels. Traditional methods for selecting sealing materials and profiles often rely on empirical analogies, lacking a quantitative evaluation system. Inadequate design of sealing solutions has led to issues such as tunnel leakage and segment cracking. To address this issue, a multi-criteria decision-making model based on the TOPSIS method is proposed to balance the requirements of waterproof performance, assembly performance, and economic efficiency in sealing solutions. Firstly, the geometric dimensions of 60 sealing gasket profiles are collected in detail. A dataset of 540 sealing solutions is constructed through finite element simulations, considering variations in material hardness and groove filling ratio, which forms the data foundation for the evaluation model. Key design thresholds are then introduced, allowing the model to adapt to the design requirements of different tunnel engineering projects. Moreover, the diminishing marginal effect is applied to the data processing to refine the evaluation model, addressing the potential overemphasis on a single performance criterion in traditional approaches. A game theory-based combined weighting strategy is employed to determine the overall weights of five performance indicators, ensuring a scientifically balanced integration of multiple weighting methods. The results from the case study demonstrate significant performance differences between the alternatives that meet the design thresholds. The optimal solution achieved a 44.268 % increase in waterproof pressure, 45.83 % improvement in joint gap tolerance, 24.01 % increase in maximum deflection force, 5.53 % reduction in groove filling ratio, and 55.53 % reduction in cost compared with the least effective solution, leading to a synergistic enhancement of the waterproof, assembly, and economic performance of the sealing solution. Overall, the proposed methodology supports shield tunnel engineering in selecting the most suitable sealing solution and provides a foundation for the design and performance enhancement of gasket materials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 107127"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-criteria evaluation model of rubber sealing gasket for shield tunnel joint\",\"authors\":\"Chenjie Gong ,&nbsp;Chaoran Xie ,&nbsp;Hehua Zhu ,&nbsp;Zhiguo Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tust.2025.107127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Rubber sealing gasket materials play a critical role in the waterproof design of joints in shield tunnels. Traditional methods for selecting sealing materials and profiles often rely on empirical analogies, lacking a quantitative evaluation system. Inadequate design of sealing solutions has led to issues such as tunnel leakage and segment cracking. To address this issue, a multi-criteria decision-making model based on the TOPSIS method is proposed to balance the requirements of waterproof performance, assembly performance, and economic efficiency in sealing solutions. Firstly, the geometric dimensions of 60 sealing gasket profiles are collected in detail. A dataset of 540 sealing solutions is constructed through finite element simulations, considering variations in material hardness and groove filling ratio, which forms the data foundation for the evaluation model. Key design thresholds are then introduced, allowing the model to adapt to the design requirements of different tunnel engineering projects. Moreover, the diminishing marginal effect is applied to the data processing to refine the evaluation model, addressing the potential overemphasis on a single performance criterion in traditional approaches. A game theory-based combined weighting strategy is employed to determine the overall weights of five performance indicators, ensuring a scientifically balanced integration of multiple weighting methods. The results from the case study demonstrate significant performance differences between the alternatives that meet the design thresholds. The optimal solution achieved a 44.268 % increase in waterproof pressure, 45.83 % improvement in joint gap tolerance, 24.01 % increase in maximum deflection force, 5.53 % reduction in groove filling ratio, and 55.53 % reduction in cost compared with the least effective solution, leading to a synergistic enhancement of the waterproof, assembly, and economic performance of the sealing solution. Overall, the proposed methodology supports shield tunnel engineering in selecting the most suitable sealing solution and provides a foundation for the design and performance enhancement of gasket materials.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825007655\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825007655","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

橡胶密封垫片材料在盾构隧道接缝防水设计中起着至关重要的作用。传统的密封材料和型材的选择方法往往依赖于经验类比,缺乏定量的评价体系。密封解决方案设计不当导致了隧道泄漏和管片开裂等问题。为了解决这一问题,提出了一种基于TOPSIS方法的多准则决策模型,以平衡密封方案中防水性能、装配性能和经济效率的要求。首先,详细收集了60种密封垫片的几何尺寸;通过有限元模拟,构建了540种密封方案的数据集,考虑了材料硬度和沟槽填充率的变化,为评价模型提供了数据基础。然后引入关键设计阈值,使模型能够适应不同隧道工程的设计要求。此外,将边际递减效应应用于数据处理,以改进评估模型,解决传统方法中可能过度强调单一性能标准的问题。采用基于博弈论的组合加权策略确定五项绩效指标的总体权重,保证多种加权方法的科学均衡整合。案例研究的结果表明,满足设计阈值的备选方案之间存在显著的性能差异。与最不有效方案相比,最优方案的防水压力提高了44.268%,接缝间隙公差提高了45.83%,最大挠度力提高了24.01%,槽填充率降低了5.53%,成本降低了55.53%,从而协同提高了密封方案的防水性能、装配性能和经济性能。总的来说,所提出的方法为盾构隧道工程选择最合适的密封解决方案提供了支持,并为衬垫材料的设计和性能提高提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-criteria evaluation model of rubber sealing gasket for shield tunnel joint
Rubber sealing gasket materials play a critical role in the waterproof design of joints in shield tunnels. Traditional methods for selecting sealing materials and profiles often rely on empirical analogies, lacking a quantitative evaluation system. Inadequate design of sealing solutions has led to issues such as tunnel leakage and segment cracking. To address this issue, a multi-criteria decision-making model based on the TOPSIS method is proposed to balance the requirements of waterproof performance, assembly performance, and economic efficiency in sealing solutions. Firstly, the geometric dimensions of 60 sealing gasket profiles are collected in detail. A dataset of 540 sealing solutions is constructed through finite element simulations, considering variations in material hardness and groove filling ratio, which forms the data foundation for the evaluation model. Key design thresholds are then introduced, allowing the model to adapt to the design requirements of different tunnel engineering projects. Moreover, the diminishing marginal effect is applied to the data processing to refine the evaluation model, addressing the potential overemphasis on a single performance criterion in traditional approaches. A game theory-based combined weighting strategy is employed to determine the overall weights of five performance indicators, ensuring a scientifically balanced integration of multiple weighting methods. The results from the case study demonstrate significant performance differences between the alternatives that meet the design thresholds. The optimal solution achieved a 44.268 % increase in waterproof pressure, 45.83 % improvement in joint gap tolerance, 24.01 % increase in maximum deflection force, 5.53 % reduction in groove filling ratio, and 55.53 % reduction in cost compared with the least effective solution, leading to a synergistic enhancement of the waterproof, assembly, and economic performance of the sealing solution. Overall, the proposed methodology supports shield tunnel engineering in selecting the most suitable sealing solution and provides a foundation for the design and performance enhancement of gasket materials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信