电针与激光针刺治疗马胸腰背痛的比较

Kaitlin Sebring, Allison K. Dockery, Leslie M. Phelps, Sharon K. Vaughn, Katherine L. Ellis
{"title":"电针与激光针刺治疗马胸腰背痛的比较","authors":"Kaitlin Sebring,&nbsp;Allison K. Dockery,&nbsp;Leslie M. Phelps,&nbsp;Sharon K. Vaughn,&nbsp;Katherine L. Ellis","doi":"10.1016/j.eqre.2025.100041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Back pain is commonly identified in equine athletes. Acupuncture provides analgesia and is used to treat horses with thoracolumbar back pain with significant improvements seen after a few sessions. However, electroacupuncture is not always tolerated by the horse, thus laser acupuncture is often used as an alternative treatment method. No studies have been performed comparing electroacupuncture versus laser acupuncture in reducing thoracolumbar back pain in the horse.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Twenty-one horses with confirmed thoracolumbar pain were randomly assigned to 3 different treatment groups: control (no treatment), electroacupuncture, or laser acupuncture. Each horse underwent 3 rounds of treatment on Day 1, 4, and 7, and mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNTs) were measured at baseline (Day 0), after each treatment (Day 1,4,7), and 1-week post-treatments (Day 14). A linear mixed model was used to test for effects of treatment group on MNT, with fixed factors used for treatment group, time, and site and all two- and one three-way interaction effect and random intercepts for each horse and side within each horse.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Electroacupuncture significantly increased MNTs at all but one site on day 7 and all sites on day 14. Laser acupuncture significantly increased MNTs at three of the five sites on day 7 and 14. Electroacupuncture resulted in greater pain relief compared to the control group at L3 at day 7 and 14. No other significant differences between treatment groups were found.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Electroacupuncture and laser acupuncture are viable tools for addressing and relieving thoracolumbar pain after three sessions. Analgesic effects last for one week after 3 treatment sessions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100041"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of electroacupuncture versus laser acupuncture in horses with thoracolumbar back pain\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlin Sebring,&nbsp;Allison K. Dockery,&nbsp;Leslie M. Phelps,&nbsp;Sharon K. Vaughn,&nbsp;Katherine L. Ellis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eqre.2025.100041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Back pain is commonly identified in equine athletes. Acupuncture provides analgesia and is used to treat horses with thoracolumbar back pain with significant improvements seen after a few sessions. However, electroacupuncture is not always tolerated by the horse, thus laser acupuncture is often used as an alternative treatment method. No studies have been performed comparing electroacupuncture versus laser acupuncture in reducing thoracolumbar back pain in the horse.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Twenty-one horses with confirmed thoracolumbar pain were randomly assigned to 3 different treatment groups: control (no treatment), electroacupuncture, or laser acupuncture. Each horse underwent 3 rounds of treatment on Day 1, 4, and 7, and mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNTs) were measured at baseline (Day 0), after each treatment (Day 1,4,7), and 1-week post-treatments (Day 14). A linear mixed model was used to test for effects of treatment group on MNT, with fixed factors used for treatment group, time, and site and all two- and one three-way interaction effect and random intercepts for each horse and side within each horse.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Electroacupuncture significantly increased MNTs at all but one site on day 7 and all sites on day 14. Laser acupuncture significantly increased MNTs at three of the five sites on day 7 and 14. Electroacupuncture resulted in greater pain relief compared to the control group at L3 at day 7 and 14. No other significant differences between treatment groups were found.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Electroacupuncture and laser acupuncture are viable tools for addressing and relieving thoracolumbar pain after three sessions. Analgesic effects last for one week after 3 treatment sessions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949905425000234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949905425000234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背部疼痛在马类运动员中很常见。针灸具有镇痛作用,并用于治疗马的胸腰背痛,经过几次治疗后效果显著。然而,电针并不总是被马耐受,因此激光针灸经常被用作替代治疗方法。目前还没有研究比较电针和激光针刺在减轻马胸腰背痛方面的疗效。材料与方法将21匹确诊胸腰椎疼痛的马随机分为3个不同的治疗组:对照组(不治疗)、电针组和激光针组。每匹马在第1、4和7天接受3轮治疗,并在基线(第0天)、每次治疗后(第1、4、7天)和治疗后1周(第14天)测量机械伤害感受阈值(mnt)。采用线性混合模型检验治疗组对MNT的影响,治疗组、时间和地点采用固定因素,所有两种和一种三向相互作用效应,每匹马和每匹马的一侧随机截取。结果选择电针在第7天显著增加了除1个部位外的所有部位的MNTs,在第14天显著增加了所有部位的MNTs。激光针刺在第7天和第14天显著增加了5个部位中3个的mnt。在第7天和第14天,与对照组相比,电针在L3时产生了更大的疼痛缓解。治疗组间未发现其他显著差异。电针和激光针刺是治疗和缓解胸腰椎疼痛的可行工具。3次治疗后,镇痛效果持续1周。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of electroacupuncture versus laser acupuncture in horses with thoracolumbar back pain

Introduction

Back pain is commonly identified in equine athletes. Acupuncture provides analgesia and is used to treat horses with thoracolumbar back pain with significant improvements seen after a few sessions. However, electroacupuncture is not always tolerated by the horse, thus laser acupuncture is often used as an alternative treatment method. No studies have been performed comparing electroacupuncture versus laser acupuncture in reducing thoracolumbar back pain in the horse.

Materials and methods

Twenty-one horses with confirmed thoracolumbar pain were randomly assigned to 3 different treatment groups: control (no treatment), electroacupuncture, or laser acupuncture. Each horse underwent 3 rounds of treatment on Day 1, 4, and 7, and mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNTs) were measured at baseline (Day 0), after each treatment (Day 1,4,7), and 1-week post-treatments (Day 14). A linear mixed model was used to test for effects of treatment group on MNT, with fixed factors used for treatment group, time, and site and all two- and one three-way interaction effect and random intercepts for each horse and side within each horse.

Results

Electroacupuncture significantly increased MNTs at all but one site on day 7 and all sites on day 14. Laser acupuncture significantly increased MNTs at three of the five sites on day 7 and 14. Electroacupuncture resulted in greater pain relief compared to the control group at L3 at day 7 and 14. No other significant differences between treatment groups were found.

Discussion

Electroacupuncture and laser acupuncture are viable tools for addressing and relieving thoracolumbar pain after three sessions. Analgesic effects last for one week after 3 treatment sessions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信